411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks
History of Historical Writing/Archaic Historians
Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
< Table of Contents
Archaic Historians
Introduction
In this chapter we will concern ourselves with historical documents
where the personality of the writer is not a contributing factor to
the document, and is often not mentioned. This situation is typical
for the early great civilizations such as Mesopotamia and
Ancient Egypt, where
professional scribes acted as executors of the intentions of their
patrons, and not as contributors, partners or even as the leads in
the determination of the historical interest of the documents they
produced.
Role of the Historian
Much of the historical writing we will consider in this section
is either biographical or serves the purpose of propaganda in some
form of another. The patrons of these texts intended for their actions,
their life, their deeds to be glorified and remembered by future
generations.
A very large number of the texts that we know about from this area
are monumental inscriptions. Here, the historian only had the
task of drafting the text, which was then transferred to the representational
material by the stone workers or painters. (Often, the inscriptions
did not survive, we only have the copies of the inscriptions into more portable
formats.) It is unfortunately unclear what an impact this writing process had
on the textual content.
While it may seem weird for people to strive to produce massive
inscriptions that 99% of the population could not read, the
form of the message was still understood by all: The sponsor of
the writing was wealthy and powerful enough to afford the
expenditure of the monument. Of course, not all stone inscriptions
were massive; see for example the Palermo Stone
or the Narmer Palette.
The other main category of text types are those that employ writing
formats optimized for day to day usage such as the
cuneiform tablets of the Mesopotamian
civilizations. In Ancient Egypt,
Papyrus was also in use to record historical
texts and communication.
Social Status of the Historian
The (anonymous) writers of the texts we will consider in this section
belonged to the middle levels of the social strata. Their work
required extensive and expensive training and tied them closely into
the bureaucratic machinery of either the palace or the temple, the
only social entities who could afford to pay for their upkeep.
Since vassal states often did not have the economic infrastructure
to maintain the necessary scribal schools, the imperial courts would
loan scribes to their allies. These not only facilitated the bureaucratic
correspondence, but also were convenient ambassadors, spies and
"supervisors" of the vassals, acting as constant reminders of the
superiority of the imperial culture.
Categories of Texts
The main alternative textual form is the chronicle or the list,
simply enumerating office holders, events or similar items of interest
for the stately or priestly bureaucracies. Such enumerations are
usually composed without much of an attempt to form an overarching
narrative.
Both of these categories of genre share the characteristic that they
recount very recent history. As a result, the professional scribes
who lent their skill to these productions did not have to perform any
historical research, that is, employ any historical techniques for
discovering the ways in which the past was different from their present.
In this sense we can consider their historiographical work as being
in its infancy. Of course, the availability of such historical records
like chronicles and lists is an important prerequisite for developing
such a skill.
Chapters
Archaic Historians of Egypt
Archaic Historians of Mesopotamia
Archaic Historians of Palaestine
Hittite Archaic Historians
Where there Indian Archaic Historians?
Where there Chinese Archaic Historians?
Bibliography
James Henry Breasted, Ancient Records of Egypt, 5 vols, University of Illinois Press (Urbana — Chicago), 2001 (reprint from 1906).
James B. Pritchard (ed), Ancient Near Eastern Texts relating to the Old Testament, 3rd edition, Princeton University Press (Princeton) 1969.