411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks
Radiation Oncology/CNS/Protons
Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
Proton Therapy in CNS
By Site
Acoustic neuroma
Pituitary adenoma
Craniopharyngioma
Medulloblastoma
Germinoma
Pediatric low grade glioma
Anaplastic glioma
Glioblastoma
Treatment Planning
Harvard
2010 20472369 -- "In vivo proton beam range verification using spine MRI changes." (Gensheimer MF, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Sep 1;78(1):268-75. Epub 2010 May 17.)
Retrospective. 10 patients. Quantitative spine T1 MRI changes used to determine distal dose edge
Outcome: Distal fall-off sometimes further than planned, mean overshoot 1.9 mm (0.8-3.1 mm)
Conclusion: In vivo proton range verficiation, systematic overshoot but within treatment planning uncertainity
1995 8746720 -- "Comparison of proton and x-ray conformal dose distributions for radiosurgery applications." (Serago CF, Med Phys. 1995 Dec;22(12):2111-6.)
Treatment planning. Proton therapy (small number of fields), multiple-arc photons, conformal photons. Several SRS case
Outcome: Proton dose distributions superior to photons, difference negligible for smallest target volumes and largest for large target volumes
PSI
IMRT vs IMPT; 2004 15519805 -- "Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions." (Baumert BG, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 15;60(4):1314-24.)
Treatment planning. 6 patients, brain lesions (multifocal, ovoid, irregular). Photon IMRT using micromultileaf collimators (mMLC) vs spot-scanning PT vs IMPT
PTV Outcome: PTV dose conformation equally good. 90% and 80% isodose volume comparable. 50% isodose IMRT better 3/6 and IMPT better 3/6. 30% isodose IMPT better
OAR Outcome: Concavities equally spared with IMRT and IMPT
Conclusion: PTV and OAR coverage equivalent; advantage of protons in lower integral dose
2nd cancers; 2002 12377335 -- "Potential reduction of the incidence of radiation-induced second cancers by using proton beams in the treatment of pediatric tumors." (Miralbell R, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Nov 1;54(3):824-9.)
Treatment planning. 2 children, parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma. Conventional photon vs. IMRT vs PT vs IMPT. Secondary cancer incidence estimated
Outcome: RMS: protons reduced expected incidence by > 2x over photons; MB protons reduced expected incidence by 8-15x over photons
Conclusion: Potential for significant reduction in secondary cancers with proton therapy
3D-CRT vs PT; 2001 11286852 -- "A comparison of dose distributions of proton and photon beams in stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain lesions." (Baumert BG, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Apr 1;49(5):1439-49.)
Treatment planning. 7 patients, brain lesions (concave, ellipsoid, superficial close to OAR, irregular complex), stereotactic frame. Photon 3D-RT micromultileaf collimators (mMLC) vs spot-scanning energy-modulated proton beam
Outcome: High degree of conformation with both mMLC and PT; comparable conformity for 5/7 plans, PT better for complex or concave lesions or near OAR
Conclusion: For complex shapes or proximity to OAR, PT potentially better
Paraorbital; 2000 10863085 -- "Optimizing radiotherapy of orbital and paraorbital tumors: intensity-modulated X-ray beams vs. intensity-modulated proton beams." (Miralbell R, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1111-9.)
Treatment planning. 4 orbital/paraorbital tumors. IMRT vs IMPT.
Outcome: PTV coverage comparable. DVHs for OAR better with IMPT, though predicted severe NTCP equally low
Conclusion: Both IMRT and IMPT optimally treated PTV and reduced severe late toxicity; IMPT better at low/mid dose regions
IMRT vs PT; 1999 10435821 -- "A treatment planning inter-comparison of proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy." (Lomax AJ, Radiother Oncol. 1999 Jun;51(3):257-71.)
Treatment planning. 9 cases (brain, H&N, abdomen, pelvis). 3D-CRT vs IMRT vs PT
Outcome: PT reduced integral dose 3x, and mean OAR and mean irradiated volume compared to both photon plans. However, comparable dose distribution >70% of prescribed dose. IMRT plan better in 3 cases for OAR avoidance
Conclusion: Protons reduce medium and low dose volumes, but high dose conformation comparable
Supratentorial; 1997 9231669 -- "Potential role of proton therapy in the treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumors: reduction of the supratentorial target volume." (Miralbell R, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Jun 1;38(3):477-84.)
Treatment planning. 3 year old child with medulloblastoma. Photon whole brain (conventional 2 field) vs. hand-optimized photon brain (6 fields) vs. IMRT (9 fields) vs. proton (3 fields). Whole brain 30 Gy + posterior fossa/ventricle boost 10 Gy.
Outcome: both optimized photon plans only slightly worse than proton plan
Conclusion: Decrease in morbidity can be expected from protons and optimized photon plans compared to whole brain irradiation
Craniospinal; 1997 9240650 -- "Potential role of proton therapy in the treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma/primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors: spinal theca irradiation." (Miralbell R, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Jul 1;38(4):805-11.)
Treatment planning. 2 year old child with neuroblastoma, undergoing CSI. Single posterior 6 MV photon field vs. single posterior 100 MeV proton field, 30 Gy
Outcome: Target (spinal dural sac) coverage comparable. Vertebral body V50% photons 100% vs. protons 20%. Heart dose V60% photons 60% vs. protons 0%
Conclusion: Potential role for proton therapy in decreasing OAR dose during CSI irradiation
Southern Switzerland; 2003 12885446 -- "Radiotherapy of small intracranial tumours with different advanced techniques using photon and proton beams: a treatment planning study." (Bolsi A, Radiother Oncol. 2003 Jul;68(1):1-14.)
Treatment planning. 12 patients (acoustic neuroma, meningioma, pituitary adenoma). 3D-CRT vs IMRT vs spot scanned PT (SSp) vs passive scatter PT (PSp)
Outcome: Proton techniques superior to photon approaches for target uniformity/conformity and OAR sparing.
Conclusion: Considering long life expectancy, long term toxicity and secondary tumors favor proton irradiation over photons