411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks
Radiation Oncology/Heel Spurs
Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
See also: Level I Evidence
Plantar fasciitis / Heel Spurs
Heel spur first described in 1900 as exostatic plantar bone formation at the insertion of the plantar fascia
Plantar heel spur - into calf
Dorsal heel spur - into Achilles tendon
Overall prevalence estimated 8-10%
Symptoms: extensive pain under heel, may radiate into lower leg. Usually gait and mobility impairment
Etiology: Pain is driven by active inflammation and degenerative process at the insertion of plantar fascia onto the medial calcaneal tuberosity. Heel spur may or may not form, and may be completely asymptomatic. Presence of absence of heel spurs has no bearing of clinical efficacy of LDRT, which treats the soft tissue inflammation
Treatment: as for osteoarthritis; decreasing weight-bearing, NSAIDS, corticoid crystal suspensions, local anesthesia, iontophoresis, microwave/ultrasound
RT role:
RT does not dissolve heel spur, if present.
RT dose 3 Gy total in 0.5 Gy/fx twice weekly effective
Wiesbaden, 2007 (Germany) (1990-2002) 17453376 -- "Demographic, clinical and treatment related predictors for event-free probability following low-dose radiotherapy for painful heel spurs - a retrospective multicenter study of 502 patients." (Muecke R, Acta Oncol. 2007;46(2):239-46.)
Retrospective. 502 patients with painful heel spurs. Low-dose RT. Median F/U 2.1 years
RT: 6 or 10 MV beam: 5 Gy in 10 fxs twice weekly, or 5 Gy in 5 fxs twice weekly; 175 kVP beam: 6 Gy in 6 fxs three times weekly
8-year EFS: 61%; prognostic factors: only one RT course, age >58, megavoltage photons
Conclusion: low-dose RT very effective for painful heel spurs
Offenbach, 2007 (Germany) 17225939 -- "Radiation Therapy for Painful Heel Spurs : Results of a Prospective Randomized Study." (Heyd R, Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Jan;183(1):3-9.)
Randomized. 130 patients with painful heel spurs. RT low-dose 3 Gy in 0.5 Gy/fx twice weekly vs. high-dose 6 Gy in 1.0 Gy/fx twice weekly
Outcome: 6-month excellent/good LD 66% vs. 68% (NS)
Conclusion: RT effective, shouldn't give more than 3 Gy