Past LSAT Explained/PrepTest 45/Method of Argument

attempt to undermine the analysts' argument by questioning the truth of its premises attempts to undermine the analysts' argument by suggesting that the analysts present it for self-serving reasons attempts to undermine the analysts' argument by drawing an alternative conclusion from the analysts' premises argues that the analysts' conclusion is basically right, but suggests that it is somewhat too optimistic argues in favor of the analysts' conclusion, but does so on the basis of a different body of evidence proposing an alternative course of action for achieving the objectives of the proposal being argued against raising considerations in order to show that the proposal being argued against, if strictly implemented, would lead to absurd consequences using specific examples in order to show that an alternative to the proposal being argued against would better achieve the ends to which the original proposal was directed introducing a case analogous to the one under consideration to show that a general implementation of the proposal being argued against would be impossible questioning the motivation of those who made the proposal being argued against 45/Method of Argument