411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks
Radiation Oncology/Supportive care/Gynecomastia
Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
Gynecomastia
Overview
Frequent side effect of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, particularly with androgen receptor blockers such as Casodex. In the EPC Programme, 68% of patients developed gynecomastia and 74% developed breast pain
Increases in testosterone levels are also accompanied by increases in 17-beta estradiol due to aromatization of androgens in extragonadal tissues
Estrogens induce benign proliferation of male breast glandular tissue
Proliferation phase can last up to ~1 year, and is often associated with breast tenderness and pain. Long-term, irreversible fibrosis develops
Prophylactic RT can be effective
Typically single electron beam, sharp dose-gradient (6-12 MeV depending on patient size)
Multiple fractionation regimens (15/1, 12/1, 10/1, 12/2, 12/3) have been used
Prophylactic hormonal therapies have also shown efficacy
Tamoxifen shows dose-dependent response, with 20 mg QD showing best outcome
Anastrozole was not shown to be efficacious
An Italian randomized trial showed better efficacy of tamoxifen compared directly with RT. Side effects were minimal in both arms
Surgery (subcutaneous mastectomy) is typically reserved for advanced cases that don't respond to initial management
RT vs. Hormonal agents
Italy (2002-2004) -- observation vs. tamoxifen vs RT
Randomized, 3 arms. 5 centers. 151 patients with prostate cancer, any TN, M0, no gynecomastia/breast pain. Arm 1) bicalutamide 150 mg alone vs. Arm 2) bicalutamide 150 mg + tamoxifen 10 mg x24 weeks vs. Arm 3) bicalutamide 150 mg + RT 12/1. RT given as electrons to 5cm diameter of tissue around each nipple, 6-12 MeV to deliver 90% between skin and chest wall. In observation patients who developed gynecomastia (35/50), subsequently randomized to TAM or RT
2005 PMID 15863377 -- "Efficacy of tamoxifen and radiotherapy for prevention and treatment of gynaecomastia and breast pain caused by bicalutamide in prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial." (Perdona S, Lancet Oncol. 2005 May;6(5):295-300.)
Outcome: Gynecomastia observation 69% vs. TAM 8% (SS) vs. RT 34% (SS). Breast pain observation 57% vs. TAM 6% (SS) vs. RT 30% (SS). In observation patients randomized secondarily, gynecomastia TAM 12% vs. RT 56% (SS)
Toxicity: both TAM and RT well tolerated
Conclusion: Antiestrogen treatment with TAM appears superior to RT
Italy (2002-2004) -- observation vs. tamoxifen vs RT
Randomized. 102 patients, treated with RP for localized or locally advanced PCA. Treated with adjuvant bicalutamide and Arm 1) observation vs. Arm 2) tamoxifen 10 mg vs. Arm 3) RT. Arm 1 failures subsequently randomized to TAM vs. RT
2005 PMID 16280763 -- "Gynecomastia and breast pain induced by adjuvant therapy with bicalutamide after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer: the role of tamoxifen and radiotherapy." (DiLorenzo G, J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2197-203.)
Outcome: Gynecomastia observation 67% vs. TAM 8% (SS) vs. RT 34% (SS). Breast pain 58% vs. 7% vs. 30%
Toxicity: No difference in QoL between TAM and RT
Conclusion: Gynecomastia and breast pain induced by bicalutamide after RP can be prevented. Tamoxifen more effective than RT
RT
European (1999-2001) -- RT 10/1 vs. sham
Randomized. 106 patients, prostate cancer (T1b-T4NxM0), Casodex 150 mg/d x1 year. Arm 1) RT 10/1 electrons vs. Arm 2) sham RT.
2004 PMID 15380582 -- "Prophylactic breast irradiation with a single dose of electron beam radiotherapy (10 Gy) significantly reduces the incidence of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia." (Tyrrell CJ, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Oct 1;60(2):476-83.)
Outcome: Gynecomastia RT 52% vs. sham 85% (SS), fewer were >5 cm (11% vs. 50%) and fewer were moderate/severe (21% vs 48%). Breast pain 83% vs. 91% (NS)
Conclusion: Prophylactic breast RT is effective and well tolerated for prevention of gynecomastia
Hormonal therapies
Canada/EU -- Tamoxifen (dose escalation) vs observation
Randomized. 282 patients, prostate cancer, treated with biclutamide 150 mg x2 years. Arm 1) Tamoxifen (1 mg, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg) vs. Arm 2) placebo x12 months
2007 PMID 17270340 -- "Tamoxifen as prophylaxis for prevention of gynaecomastia and breast pain associated with bicalutamide 150 mg monotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-response study." (Fradet Y, Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):106-14. Epub 2007 Jan 16.)
Outcome: 1-year breast events TAM 86% - 60% - 55% - 23% - 9% vs. observation 97%; TAM response was dose-dependent. At 2-year (after 1 year of casodex monotherapy), all groups comparable breast events
Toxicity: Hot flashes if TAM >= 5 mg. No impact on PSA control
Conclusion: Prophylactic TAM 20 mg/d is an effective dose
Italy (2000-2002) -- observation vs. tamoxifen vs. anastrozole
Randomized. 114 patients with localized, locally advanced, or recurrent prostate cancer. Treated with bicalutamide 150 mg. Arm 1) placebo vs. Arm 2) tamoxifen 20 mg/d vs. Arm 3) anastrozole 1 mg/d x 48 weeks
2005 PMID 15681525 -- "Evaluation of tamoxifen and anastrozole in the prevention of gynecomastia and breast pain induced by bicalutamide monotherapy of prostate cancer." (Boccardo F, J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 1;23(4):808-15.)
Outcome: Gynecomastia observation 73% vs TAM 10% vs. anastrozole 51% (SS). Breast pain 39% vs. 6% vs. 27% (SS).
Toxicity: No difference in PSA response. Adverse events 37% vs. 35% vs. 69% (SS). No difference in sexual function
Conclusion: Tamoxifen was effective, no significant benefit for anastrozole
US Multi-institutional -- placebo vs. tamoxifen vs. anastrozole
Randomized, 3 arms. 107 patients with prostate cancer, T1-4 any NM0 (T2-3 in 92%), on bicalutamide 150 mg/d. Arm 1) observation vs. Arm 2) tamoxifen 20 mg/d vs. Arm 3) anastrozole 1 mg/d x3 months. Excluded if gynecomastia >2cm or breast discomfort
2005 PMID 15685254 -- "Prevention and management of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain: randomized endocrinologic and clinical studies with tamoxifen and anastrozole." (Saltzstein D, Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8(1):75-83.)
Outcome: 3-month gynecomastia TAM 12% (SS) vs. anastrozole 64% (NS) vs. placebo 69%
Toxicity: PSA decreased in all groups
Conclusion: Incidence of gynecomastia reduced by tamoxifen; anastrozole 1mg/d not a viable option