Chess Opening Theory/1. d4/1...Nf6/2. c4/2...e5/3. dxe5/3...Ne4

Fajarowicz variation rd nd bd qd kd bd rd pd pd pd pd pd pd pd pl pl nd pl pl pl pl pl pl rl nl bl ql kl bl nl rl 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ne4 A51 Budapest Gambit Fajarowicz variation The Fajarowicz variation or Fajarowicz gambit is said to have its origins in the chess circles from Leipzig, with the first important game being H.Steiner – Fajarowicz at the 1928 Wiesbaden tournament.Borik 1986, p.60Tseitlin 1992, p.89 Black makes no immediate effort to regain the gambit pawn, preferring to concentrate on active piece play. As the game develops, White has to avoid several tactical pitfalls, in particular a Bb4+ at an annoying moment; a Qf6 doing a double attack on b2 and f2; (after 1...d6 2.exd6 Bxd6) the pseudo-sacrifice 3...Nxf2 4.Kxf2 Bg3+ and 5...Qxd1, winning White's queen for two minor pieces; and, once White has played e3, a concerted attack on the d3 square with the setup Nc5/Bf5/Nb4. According to Borik, the best moves for both players are 4.Nf3 Bb4+ 5.Nd2 Nc6 6.a3 Nxd2 7.Nxd2 Bf8 when it is difficult for Black to justify their pawn sacrifice.Borik 1986, p.92 The variation 4.a3 also gives Black some headache, disallowing the check on b4 and preparing to attack the knight with Qc2. The response 4...Qh4?!, introduced in O'Kelly – Bisguier (1969) is dubious after 5.g3 Qh5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Qc2! Minor variations 4.Qd3 and 4.Qd4 Both 4.Qd3 and 4.Qd4 seem to gain a tempo by attacking the Ne4, but after 4...Nc5 followed by 5...Nc6 Black gets their tempo back and the queen remains misplaced. Black can develop with d6 its Bb8 with the pawn exchange d7–d6, and then setup an attack on the light squares c2 and d3 with moves like Bf5 and Nb4. It is important that Black gets the move d7–d6 soon enough, as they must be able to answer a possible Bc1–g5 with Qd8–d7. In that way they avoid an exchange of pieces and the queen can still play on the light squares via the f5-square. If White gets their queen on g3, Black can protect their g7-pawn with Nc5–e6 when the white queen will soon reveal to be misplaced.Borik 1986, p.63–65 4.Qd5 The move 4.Qd5 seems better than 4.Qd3 or 4.Qd4 as the queen cannot readily be attacked by the black knights. Borik recommends 4...Bb4+ (considered as "playable" by Lalic) so that White has the annoying choice between giving their bishop pair with 5.Bd2, wrecking their pawn structure with 5.Nc3, or blocking their own bishop with 5.Nd2. In that latter case, an important tactical finess is that after the possible 5...Nc5 6.a3 Bxd2+ 7.Bxd2 b6! White cannot take the black rook because of 8.Qxa8? Bb7 9.Qxa7 Nc6 that wins the white queen.Borik 1986, p66; Borik says it has been suggested by J.Staker. Thus Black can freely develop its queenside, harass the white queen and later regain the e5-pawn. 4.Nd2 The cautious 4.Nd2 allows the retreat 4...Nc5, letting the Nd2 misplaced and obstructing the Bc1. Then the hasty 5.b4 runs into 5...Ne6 6.a3 a5! and the attack on the b4-pawn forces White to give away the c5-square with 7.b5. Black has a good game as they can install a knight on the strongpost c5 and then concentrate on regaining the e5-pawn.Borik 1986, p.85 White does better with 5.Ngf3 Nc6 and a transposition in the 4.Nf3 variation. Theory table 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ne4 4 5 6 7 8 Qd3Nc5 = Qd4Nc5 = Qd5Bb4+ = Nd2Nc5 Ngf3Nc6 Qc2Bb4+ Nc3d5 exd6Bf5 Bd2Nxd6 e4Bxc3 += Nf3Bb4+ Nbd2d5 exd6Qxd6 e3Nc6 Be2Bf5 += a3Nc6 Nf3d6 Qc2d5 e3Bg4 cxd5Qxd5 += Budapest Gambit Footnotes References