411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks
Canadian Criminal Law/Offences/Arson
Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
Arson
Legislation
Arson — disregard for human life
433. Every person who intentionally or recklessly causes damage by fire or explosion to property, whether or not that person owns the property, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life where
(a) the person knows that or is reckless with respect to whether the property is inhabited or occupied; or
(b) the fire or explosion causes bodily harm to another person. CCC
Arson — damage to property
434. Every person who intentionally or recklessly causes damage by fire or explosion to property that is not wholly owned by that person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. CCC
Arson by negligence
436. (1) Every person who owns, in whole or in part, or controls property is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years where, as a result of a marked departure from the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would use to prevent or control the spread of fires or to prevent explosions, that person is a cause of a fire or explosion in that property that causes bodily harm to another person or damage to property.
Non-compliance with prevention laws
(2) Where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (1), the fact that the person has failed to comply with any law respecting the prevention or control of fires or explosions in the property is a fact from which a marked departure from the standard of care referred to in that subsection may be inferred by the court. CCC
Proof of Offence
In addition to the essential elements of time, location and identity, the Crown should prove the following for each offence:
Arson — disregard for human life
the accused caused damage to property by fire or explosion
the accused had intention or was reckless in causing damage
the accused either:
knew or was reckless with respect to whether the property was inhabited or occupied; or
the fire or explosion causes bodily harm to another person.
Arson — damage to property
the accused caused damage to property by fire or explosion
the accused had intention or was reckless in causing damage
the property was not wholly owned by the accused
Arson by negligence
Application
The mens rea requirements does not include the need to prove a subjective foresight of the consequences of the act of starting the fire.R. v. Peters, 1991 CanLII 257 (BC C.A.) However, the crown does need to prove the "probable consequences" of starting the fire was known to the accused.R. v. S. D. D., 2002 NFCA 18 (CanLII)
'c.f.' R. v. Buttar, 1986 CanLII 1163 (BC C.A.) The minimal mens rea standard is one of recklessness.R. v. Brain, 2003 BCCA 70
R. v. Venn, 1991 CanLII 914 (BC S.C.)
It is often expected that Crown expert evidence will be required to establish the cause of the fire as being from the accused.e.g. R. v. Eng, 1996 CanLII 1598 (BC SC)
2
Expert Evidence
When weighing the evidence of an arson expert, the Court should consider:R. v. Vieira, 2005 CanLII 41367 (ON CA)
E.g. See R v Jonkman, 2012 SKQB 511 (CanLII)
whether the expert visited the scene of the fire
whether he was present in court for relevant eyewitness evidence
whether the defence expert had a flawed understanding of the Crown expert evidence
the plausibility of the alternative explanations of the fire
2
Possession of Incendiary Materials
Possession of incendiary material
436.1 Every person who possesses any incendiary material, incendiary device or explosive substance for the purpose of committing an offence under any of sections 433 to 436 is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years. CCC
See Also
Arson