Scriptapedia/Validity of models

Literature suggests that there are ways to evaluate the model(s) constructed from the group modelling session(s). There many ways to evaluate validity in qualitative inquiry, based on the lens chosen: the researcher's, the participants' or external parties' and the paradigm adopted: positivist, constructivist or critical (Creswell & Miller, 2000). Validity Procedures Within Qualitative Lens and Paradigm Assumptions   LensPostpositivist or Systematic Paradigm  Constructivist Paradigm Critical Paradigm Lens of the Researcher  Triangulation  Disconfirming evidence  Researcher reflexivity  Lens of Study Participants  Member checking  Prolonged engagement in the field  Collaboration Lens of People External to the Study (Reviewers, Readers)  The audit trail  Thick, rich description  Peer debriefing Another useful way to consider effectiveness is to evaluate reaction; insight; commitment and behavior; communication; fostering common language; building consensus or mental model alignment; system changes, results, and further use of modeling. Andersen, Richardson & Vennix (1997) also highlighted that models can be evaluated according to how replicable, cumulative, refutable and how much it met its intended outcomes. Though not necessarily evaluating validity, these factors can provide insight to modelers. The "structural" approach is an emerging method to evaluating the potential usefulness of models (Wright & Wallis, 2019) based on multiple streams of research showing that individuals and groups with more structured knowledge are better able to understand their situations and take effective action to reach their goals. References: Andersen, D. F., Richardson, G. P., & Vennix, J. A. (1997). Group model building: adding more science to the craft. System dynamics review, 13(2), 187-201. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. Rouwette, E. A., Vennix, J. A., & Mullekom, T. V. (2002). Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies. System Dynamics Review, 18(1), 5-45. Wright, B., Wallis, S. (2019). Practical Mapping for Applied Research and Program Evaluation. Sage Publications. .