Skip to main content

  | मौसम…

411 समाचार
Public archive edition · Attributed source reporting with original dates · AI drafts are excluded

411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks

Numerical Methods Qualification Exam Problems and Solutions (University of Maryland)/August 2005

Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.

Problem 1 Derive the one-, two-, and three-point Gaussian quadrature formulas such that Give Bounds on the error of these formulas. Solution 1 Find Orthogonal Polynomials w.r.t. Weighting Function For this problem, we need the first three orthogonal polynomials with respect to a weighted inner product where in our case. This can be done using Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization on the basis Zero Order Polynomial Let First Order Polynomial Second Order Polynomial Third Order Polynomial Find Roots of Polynomials The roots of these polynomials will be the interpolation nodes used in Gauss Quadrature. Formula to Compute Coefficients In Gaussian quadrature we have , where 1 point formula where is the root of . 2 point formula where are the roots of . 3 point formula where are the roots of . Derive Error Bound We know that this quadrature is exact for all polynomials of degree at most . We choose a polynomial of degree at most that Hermite interpolates i.e. The error for this interpolation is Compute the error of the quadrature as follows: where the last line follows from the mean value theorem of integrals. Notice that is simply the polynomials orthogonal with respect to weight function since are the roots of the polynomials. Hence, the error for 1 point gaussian quadrature is The error for 2 point quadrature: The error for 3 point quadrature: Problem 2 We wish to solve iteratively where Show that for this the Jacobi method and the Gauss-Seidel method both converge. Explain why for this one of these methods is better than the other. Solution 2 Jacobi Method Decompose into its diagonal, lower, and upper parts i.e. Derive Jacobi iteration by solving for x as follows: Gauss-Seidel Method Decompose into its diagonal, lower, and upper parts i.e. Derive Gauss-Sediel iteration by solving for x as follows: Jacobi Convergence Convergence occurs for the Jacobi iteration if the spectral radius of is less than 1 i.e. The eigenvalues of the matrix are i.e. the eigenvalue has order 3. Therefore, the spectral radius is . Gauss-Seidel Convergence Convergence occurs for the Gauss-Seidel iteration if the spectral radius of is less than 1 i.e. The eigenvalues of the matrix are Therefore, the spectral radius is . Comparison of Methods In general, the Gauss-Seidel iteration converges faster than the Jacobi iteration since Gauss-Seidel uses the new components of as they become available, but in this case , so the Jacobi iteration is faster. Problem 3 Consider the three-term polynomial recurrence initialized by , where each is real and each is nonzero. Problem 3a Prove that each is a monic polynomial of degree , and for every , one has Solution 3a We prove the claim by by induction. Base Case is monic with degree zero, and . is monic with degree one, and . is monic with degree 2, and . Induction Step Assume is monic with degree , and . Also, assume is monic with degree , and . Then from the hypothesis, is monic with degree . Also, since is just plus a linear combination of lower order terms already in . Problem 3b Show that for every the polynomial has simple real roots that interlace with the roots of . Solution 3b We prove the claim by induction. Base Case Let's consider the case . We know that The quadratic formula shows that has two simple real roots. Let and be the zeros of . Then, we have (because of sign changes) that and there exists such that . and there exists such that . In conclusion, . Induction Step Let and be the simple real roots of and , respectively, such that the roots of are interlaced with the roots of , i.e., Then, we have that From the induction hypothesis and have different signs since . Then, there exists such that . Proceeding in the same manner for all the intervals , we obtain that there exists such that for We now consider the smallest and largest roots of i.e. Since for , is a monic polynomial, Hence for any (any larger than the largest root of ) Therefore and implies there exists such that . If is even, then by similar reasoning and there exists such that . If is odd, and there exists such that . Problem 3c Show that for every the roots of are the eigenvalues of the symmetric tridiagonal matrix Solution 3c Let Then is a monic polynomial in of degree . Expanding this determinant along the last row, we have where and are monic polynomials of degree and , respectively. Notice that and if we let , then (1) is equivalent to the three-term recurrence stated in the problem. Thus, shows that the roots of are the eigenvalues of .