411 REFERENCE · Wikibooks
Radiation Oncology/NHL/Burkitt lymphoma
Reference material by Wikibooks contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
Burkitt's Lymphoma
Overview
Burkitt's lymphoma and Burkitt cell leukemia (BL) are classified as different manifestations of the same disease by WHO
It is a highly aggressive B-cell neoplasm, typically with extranodal presentation
Epidemiology
In children: 30-50% of lymphomas
In adults: ~1 of lymphomas
Male predominance 3-4:1
Burkitt's lymphoma has several subtypes:
Endemic (young children, Africa, associated with EBV and translocation of the MYC gene)
Sporadic (older kids, not associated with EBV but has MYC translocation)
Immunocompromised hosts
Burkitt's-like lymphoma (older age, not associated with MYC gene)
Clinical Presentation
Endemic
Prevalence 100/1,000,000 children
Typically presents with jaw or facial bone tumor
Common extranodal spread to bone marrow, meninges, mesentery, ovary/testis, kidney, breast
Sporadic
Prevalence 1/1,000,000 children
Typically with abdominal presentation, often with massive bulk and ascites
Extranodal spread as above, including CNS spread
Immunocompromised
Typically involves lymph nodes, and may present as acute leukemia
Frequently in patients with high CD4 count and no opportunistic infections
Burkitt-like lymphoma
Typically involves lymph nodes, nasopharynx, or GI tract
High propensity for bone marrow and CNS as above
B-symptoms in ~30% patients
All types tend to have very high serum LDH, and serum electrolyte imbalances
Pathology
On microscopy has "starry sky" pattern (generated by phagocytic histiocytes engulfing apoptotic nuclear debris)
Medium-sized cells, very high mitotic fraction, frequent apoptosis
Translocation is chromosome 8 myc locus with 3 possible partners (accounting for 90% of translocations):
The Ig heavy chain region on chromosome 14 : t(8;14)
The kappa light chain locus on chromosome 2: t(2;8)
The lambda light chain locus on chromosome 22: t(8;22).
However, 5-10% of DLBCL also have t(8;14) translocation. Because DLBCL is 20x more prevalent in adults, having t(8;14) creates a diagnostic challenge between Burkitt's and DLBCLC
Originates from germinal center B-cells (like Germinal B-cell DLBCL, but has different molecular signature)
Distinction between Burkitt's lymphoma and DLBCL is imprecise. Gene profiles appear to differentiate the diseases better
Only 53% concordance among expert hematopathologists
Molecular signatures: 17% and 34% of Burkitt's cases (see below) were classified by pathologists as DLBCL
WHO committees suggest the following
If morphologic features are intermediate, diagnosis of Burkitt's should only be made if the Ki-67 fraction of viable cells is at least 99 percent.
If morphologic features suggest DLBCL, but have with a high proliferation fraction or t(8;14), they should be classified as DLBCL.
Charite, 2006 (Germany) 16760442 -- "A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling." (Hummel M, N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 8;354(23):2419-30.)
Gene analysis. 220 mature aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Molecular Burkitt's lymphoma (mBL) signature developed: 58 gene set. Some patients with this signature had morphologic appearance of DLBCL
5-year OS: mBL 75%, GCB-DLBCL 51%, ABC-DLBC 12%
Myc locus survival: breakpoint 15% vs. no breakpoint 44%
Conclusion: molecular definition of Burkitt's lymphoma
Molecular Profiling Project, 2006 16760443 -- "Molecular diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma." (Dave SS, N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 8;354(23):2431-42.)
Gene analysis. 303 patients with aggressive lymphomas, 25 pathological Burkitt's. Gene profile developed. Some samples submitted as DLBCL had molecular profile of Burkitt's
Survival (28 patients): better with intensive chemo vs CHOP (SS)
Conclusion: Gene-expression profiling is accurate to differentiate BL and DLBCL
Treatment
Intense chemotherapy such as CODOX/IVAC-M necessary; CHOP insufficient
Prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy or chemotherapy that crosses BBB essential
Adults benefit from intense pediatric protocols, but often do not tolerate side effects
Risk of developing tumor lysis syndrome is high
Complete remission rates very high, but ultimate cure rate less than DLBCL
Long-term survival may be as high as 50-70% in selected patients
Bone marrow or CNS involvement results in poor prognosis, with long-term survival 0-30%
RT was initially used for patients with initial CNS involvement, but use now is minimal