1936 United States presidential election in Texas

none June 2025 September 2023 1936 United States presidential election 1936 United States presidential election in Texas Texas presidential no 1932 United States presidential election in Texas 1932 1940 United States presidential election in Texas 1940 All 23 Texas votes to the Electoral College November 3, 1936https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1936 United States Presidential election of 1936 — Encyclopædia Britannica December 23, 2018 x200px Franklin D. Roosevelt 1936 june (3x4 cropped) (B&W).jpg Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic Party (United States) New York John Nance Garner 23 739,952 87.08% LandonPortr (cropped).jpg Alf Landon Republican Party (United States) Kansas Frank Knox 0 104,661 12.32% 350px 350px County results Roosevelt #4389e3 60–70% #1666cb 70–80% #0645b4 80–90% #002b84 90–100% Landon #e27f90 50–60% #cc2f4a 60–70% President Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic Party (United States) Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic Party (United States) The 1936 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 3, 1936, as part of the 1936 United States presidential election. Texas voters chose 23https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/votes/1929_1941.html#1936 1936 Election for the Thirty-eighth Term (1937-41) December 23, 2018 representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president. Texas was won by incumbent President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D–New York), with 87.08% of the popular vote, over Governor Alf Landon (R–Kansas), with 12.32% of the popular vote, a landslide victory margin of 74.76%.http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?f=0&fips=48&year=1936 1936 Presidential General Election Results – Texas December 23, 2018http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/showelection.php?year=1936 The American Presidency Project — Election of 1936 December 23, 2018 Despite the overwhelming Democratic victory here, however, Landon performed better than fellow Republican Herbert Hoover had in 1932, with the state swinging approximately two points towards the GOP, and he managed to flip both Gillespie County and Kendall County back into the Republican column, the latter remaining with the party ever since. By percentage of the popular vote won, Texas was Roosevelt's fifth-best state, behind South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Georgia. Results 1936 United States presidential election in Texas Franklin D. Roosevelt (inc.) Democratic Party (United States) 739,952"differs" This figure differs from either of those in America at the Polls and Géoelections. 87.08% Alf Landon Republican Party (United States) 104,661 12.32% William Lemke Union Party (United States) 3,281"differs" 0.39% Norman Thomas Socialist Party of America 1,075 0.13% D. Leigh Colvin Prohibition Party 514"excluded" This Prohibition Party vote was not included in the county tables for America at the Polls.Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920-1964; p. 456 0405077114 0.06% Earl Browder Communist Party USA 253 0.03% 849,736 100% Results by county +1936 United States presidential election in Texas by countyScammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls; pp. 436–440County Franklin D. RooseveltDemocratic Alf LandonRepublicanWilliam LemkeGéoelections http://geoelections.free.fr/USA/elec_comtes/1936.htm 1936 Presidential Election Popular Vote (.xlsx file for €15 on request)Union Various candidatesOther parties Margin Total votes cast # % # % # % # % # % Anderson 3,749 92.80% 289 7.15%00.00% 2 0.05% 3,460 85.64% 4,040 Andrews 287 93.79% 18 5.88%00.00% 1 0.33% 269 87.91% 306 Angelina 3,943 91.91% 342 7.97%10.02% 4 0.09% 3,601 83.94% 4,290 Aransas 206 74.37% 60 21.66%82.89% 3 1.08% 146 52.71% 277 Archer 1,672 91.77% 146 8.01%40.22% 0 0.00% 1,526 83.75% 1,822 Armstrong 897 96.14% 33 3.54%30.32% 0 0.00% 864 92.60% 933 Atascosa 2,041 86.85% 285 12.13%170.72% 7 0.30% 1,756 74.72% 2,350 Austin 1,635 84.76% 290 15.03%20.10% 2 0.10% 1,345 69.73% 1,929 Bailey 788 79.36% 191 19.23%101.01% 4 0.40% 597 60.12% 993 Bandera 720 61.49% 431 36.81%181.54% 2 0.17% 289 24.68% 1,171 Bastrop 2,395 92.04% 198 7.61%70.27% 2 0.08% 2,197 84.44% 2,602 Baylor 1,541 93.85% 100 6.09%00.00% 1 0.06% 1,441 87.76% 1,642 Bee 1,462 70.22% 603 28.96%110.53% 6 0.29% 859 41.26% 2,082 Bell 6,119 92.42% 475 7.17%210.32% 6 0.09% 5,644 85.24% 6,621 Bexar 35,781 72.74% 12,951 26.33%2050.42% 250 0.51% 22,830 46.41% 49,187 Blanco 1,056 76.97% 313 22.81%00.00% 3 0.22% 743 54.15% 1,372 Borden 220 88.71% 26 10.48%10.40% 1 0.40% 194 78.23% 248 Bosque 2,283 86.54% 350 13.27%20.08% 3 0.11% 1,933 73.28% 2,638 Bowie 5,030 91.11% 472 8.55%120.22% 7 0.13% 4,558 82.56% 5,521 Brazoria 2,284 82.01% 462 16.59%291.04% 10 0.36% 1,822 65.42% 2,785 Brazos 2,610 98.16% 45 1.69%00.00% 4 0.15% 2,565 96.46% 2,659 Brewster 828 84.40% 151 15.39%20.20% 0 0.00% 677 69.01% 981 Briscoe 849 92.99% 64 7.01%00.00% 0 0.00% 785 85.98% 913 Brooks 365 75.57% 117 24.22%00.00% 1 0.21% 248 51.35% 483 Brown 3,971 89.08% 448 10.05%340.76% 5 0.11% 3,523 79.03% 4,458 Burleson 1,466 91.57% 135 8.43%00.00% 0 0.00% 1,331 83.14% 1,601 Burnet 1,581 93.33% 111 6.55%10.06% 1 0.06% 1,470 86.78% 1,694 Caldwell 3,019 91.76% 247 7.51%240.73% 0 0.00% 2,772 84.26% 3,290 Calhoun 685 87.71% 92 11.78%10.13% 3 0.38% 593 75.93% 781 Callahan 1,739 87.34% 245 12.31%20.10% 5 0.25% 1,494 75.04% 1,991 Cameron 5,887 71.74% 2,160 26.32%1501.83% 9 0.11% 3,727 45.42% 8,206 Camp 939 92.33% 78 7.67%00.00% 0 0.00% 861 84.66% 1,017 Carson 1,568 90.74% 147 8.51%130.75% 0 0.00% 1,421 82.23% 1,728 Cass 2,461 93.57% 169 6.43%00.00% 0 0.00% 2,292 87.15% 2,630 Castro 950 92.68% 65 6.34%100.98% 0 0.00% 885 86.34% 1,025 Chambers 984 87.78% 134 11.95%20.18% 1 0.09% 850 75.83% 1,121 Cherokee 3,908 92.65% 302 7.16%30.07% 5 0.12% 3,606 85.49% 4,218 Childress 2,076 89.99% 209 9.06%130.56% 9 0.39% 1,867 80.93% 2,307 Clay 2,168 91.09% 196 8.24%110.46% 5 0.21% 1,972 82.86% 2,380 Cochran 683 91.19% 58 7.74%10.13% 7 0.93% 625 83.44% 749 Coke 888 91.93% 68 7.04%30.31% 7 0.72% 820 84.89% 966 Coleman 2,900 91.28% 269 8.47%40.13% 4 0.13% 2,631 82.81% 3,177 Collin 5,669 91.29% 531 8.55%20.03% 8 0.13% 5,138 82.74% 6,210 Collingsworth 2,012 92.63% 158 7.27%00.00% 2 0.09% 1,854 85.36% 2,172 Colorado 1,435 79.06% 372 20.50%30.17% 5 0.28% 1,063 58.57% 1,815 Comal 1,611 74.21% 554 25.52%40.18% 2 0.09% 1,057 48.69% 2,171 Comanche 2,587 86.09% 355 11.81%602.00% 3 0.10% 2,232 74.28% 3,005 Concho 1,089 93.48% 76 6.52%00.00% 0 0.00% 1,013 86.95% 1,165 Cooke 3,686 83.93% 686 15.62%120.27% 8 0.18% 3,000 68.31% 4,392 Coryell 2,064 92.85% 150 6.75%50.22% 4 0.18% 1,914 86.10% 2,223 Cottle 1,265 93.08% 86 6.33%50.37% 3 0.22% 1,179 86.75% 1,359 Crane 622 96.14% 25 3.86%00.00% 0 0.00% 597 92.27% 647 Crockett 231 75.00% 75 24.35%20.65% 0 0.00% 156 50.65% 308 Crosby 1,711 91.64% 153 8.19%30.16% 0 0.00% 1,558 83.45% 1,867 Culberson 239 91.22% 23 8.78%00.00% 0 0.00% 216 82.44% 262 Dallam 1,436 83.15% 220 12.74%683.94% 3 0.17% 1,216 70.41% 1,727 Dallas 42,153 84.89% 7,204 14.51%1750.35% 125 0.25% 34,949 70.38% 49,657 Dawson 1,829 91.82% 156 7.83%60.30% 1 0.05% 1,673 83.99% 1,992 Deaf Smith 1,236 89.11% 142 10.24%90.65% 0 0.00% 1,094 78.88% 1,387 Delta 1,466 94.64% 82 5.29%10.06% 0 0.00% 1,384 89.35% 1,549 Denton 5,021 90.91% 476 8.62%150.27% 11 0.20% 4,545 82.29% 5,523 DeWitt 1,977 75.98% 616 23.67%10.04% 8 0.31% 1,361 52.31% 2,602 Dickens 1,445 92.57% 115 7.37%00.00% 1 0.06% 1,330 85.20% 1,561 Dimmit 704 68.95% 296 28.99%212.06% 0 0.00% 408 39.96% 1,021 Donley 1,513 90.93% 133 7.99%171.02% 1 0.06% 1,380 82.93% 1,664 Duval 2,901 94.56% 163 5.31%40.13% 0 0.00% 2,738 89.24% 3,068 Eastland 4,659 85.99% 724 13.36%170.31% 18 0.33% 3,935 72.63% 5,418 Ector 816 89.87% 81 8.92%101.10% 1 0.11% 735 80.95% 908 Edwards 354 68.87% 157 30.54%30.58% 0 0.00% 197 38.33% 514 Ellis 5,644 94.46% 319 5.34%40.07% 8 0.13% 5,325 89.12% 5,975 El Paso 11,920 86.32% 1,773 12.84%960.70% 20 0.14% 10,147 73.48% 13,809 Erath 2,694 89.95% 290 9.68%40.13% 7 0.23% 2,404 80.27% 2,995 Falls 3,411 95.92% 140 3.94%00.00% 5 0.14% 3,271 91.99% 3,556 Fannin 5,242 93.32% 368 6.55%10.02% 6 0.11% 4,874 86.77% 5,617 Fayette 2,820 82.46% 595 17.40%40.12% 1 0.03% 2,225 65.06% 3,420 Fisher 2,068 92.78% 155 6.95%20.09% 4 0.18% 1,913 85.82% 2,229 Floyd 1,863 88.93% 217 10.36%140.67% 1 0.05% 1,646 78.57% 2,095 Foard 928 92.34% 74 7.36%20.20% 1 0.10% 854 84.98% 1,005 Fort Bend 2,588 93.26% 176 6.34%90.32% 2 0.07% 2,412 86.92% 2,775 Franklin 925 90.95% 90 8.85%10.10% 1 0.10% 835 82.10% 1,017 Freestone 1,929 93.23% 134 6.48%00.00% 6 0.29% 1,795 86.76% 2,069 Frio 1,019 83.59% 193 15.83%70.57% 0 0.00% 826 67.76% 1,219 Gaines 680 93.66% 42 5.79%00.00% 4 0.55% 638 87.88% 726 Galveston 9,370 84.37% 1,666 15.00%440.40% 26 0.23% 7,704 69.37% 11,106 Garza 807 85.67% 132 14.01%20.21% 1 0.11% 675 71.66% 942 Gillespie 1,016 40.41% 1,421 56.52%692.74% 8 0.32% -405 -16.11% 2,514 Glasscock 252 89.05% 29 10.25%00.00% 2 0.71% 223 78.80% 283 Goliad 1,184 78.36% 323 21.38%20.13% 2 0.13% 861 56.98% 1,511 Gonzales 2,674 88.16% 352 11.61%30.10% 4 0.13% 2,322 76.56% 3,033 Gray 4,347 89.83% 464 9.59%210.43% 7 0.14% 3,883 80.24% 4,839 Grayson 10,627 91.64% 947 8.17%120.10% 11 0.09% 9,680 83.47% 11,597 Gregg 6,489 91.12% 621 8.72%60.08% 5 0.07% 5,868 82.40% 7,121 Grimes 1,851 93.06% 136 6.84%00.00% 2 0.10% 1,715 86.22% 1,989 Guadalupe 2,962 69.91% 1,266 29.88%30.07% 6 0.14% 1,696 40.03% 4,237 Hale 3,109 86.80% 451 12.59%120.34% 10 0.28% 2,658 74.20% 3,582 Hall 2,195 93.56% 126 5.37%200.85% 5 0.21% 2,069 88.19% 2,346 Hamilton 1,929 90.48% 202 9.47%00.00% 1 0.05% 1,727 81.00% 2,132 Hansford 826 89.69% 74 8.03%161.74% 5 0.54% 752 81.65% 921 Hardeman 1,991 90.17% 207 9.38%70.32% 3 0.14% 1,784 80.80% 2,208 Hardin 2,351 95.18% 119 4.82%00.00% 0 0.00% 2,232 90.36% 2,470 Harris 59,205 87.67% 8,083 11.97%1090.16% 136 0.20% 51,122 75.70% 67,533 Harrison 3,400 91.69% 302 8.14%00.00% 6 0.16% 3,098 83.55% 3,708 Hartley 560 93.33% 40 6.67%00.00% 0 0.00% 520 86.67% 600 Haskell 2,713 94.46% 156 5.43%20.07% 1 0.03% 2,557 89.03% 2,872 Hays 1,964 86.94% 286 12.66%90.40% 0 0.00% 1,678 74.28% 2,259 Hemphill 1,008 88.89% 121 10.67%50.44% 0 0.00% 887 78.22% 1,134 Henderson 3,259 92.45% 260 7.38%00.00% 6 0.17% 2,999 85.08% 3,525 Hidalgo 6,782 67.46% 2,962 29.46%2852.83% 24 0.24% 3,820 38.00% 10,053 Hill 4,710 94.58% 265 5.32%40.08% 1 0.02% 4,445 89.26% 4,980 Hockley 1,731 94.44% 90 4.91%20.11% 10 0.55% 1,641 89.53% 1,833 Hood 988 90.31% 102 9.32%30.27% 1 0.09% 886 80.99% 1,094 Hopkins 2,753 91.22% 261 8.65%00.00% 4 0.13% 2,492 82.57% 3,018 Houston 2,458 96.05% 99 3.87%10.04% 1 0.04% 2,359 92.18% 2,559 Howard 3,094 92.75% 230 6.89%40.12% 8 0.24% 2,864 85.85% 3,336 Hudspeth 363 93.56% 24 6.19%00.00% 1 0.26% 339 87.37% 388 Hunt 5,801 94.37% 335 5.45%70.11% 4 0.07% 5,466 88.92% 6,147 Hutchinson 2,478 86.25% 390 13.57%10.03% 4 0.14% 2,088 72.68% 2,873 Irion 476 89.81% 49 9.25%00.00% 5 0.94% 427 80.57% 530 Jack 1,113 85.22% 183 14.01%70.54% 3 0.23% 930 71.21% 1,306 Jackson 952 84.40% 171 15.16%40.35% 1 0.09% 781 69.24% 1,128 Jasper 1,500 93.05% 109 6.76%30.19% 0 0.00% 1,391 86.29% 1,612 Jeff Davis 291 89.54% 33 10.15%10.31% 0 0.00% 258 79.38% 325 Jefferson 18,187 87.40% 2,544 12.23%320.15% 45 0.22% 15,643 75.18% 20,808 Jim Hogg 712 93.68% 48 6.32%00.00% 0 0.00% 664 87.37% 760 Jim Wells 1,691 82.97% 338 16.58%70.34% 2 0.10% 1,353 66.39% 2,038 Johnson 4,281 92.12% 337 7.25%240.52% 5 0.11% 3,944 84.87% 4,647 Jones 3,396 91.71% 305 8.24%00.00% 2 0.05% 3,091 83.47% 3,703 Karnes 2,067 84.47% 371 15.16%80.33% 1 0.04% 1,696 69.31% 2,447 Kaufman 3,943 94.44% 229 5.49%10.02% 2 0.05% 3,714 88.96% 4,175 Kendall 405 36.68% 693 62.77%40.36% 2 0.18% -288 -26.09% 1,104 Kenedy 96 76.19% 30 23.81%00.00% 0 0.00% 66 52.38% 126 Kent 533 94.50% 31 5.50%00.00% 0 0.00% 502 89.01% 564 Kerr 1,586 61.26% 994 38.39%80.31% 1 0.04% 592 22.87% 2,589 Kimble 681 81.75% 151 18.13%00.00% 1 0.12% 530 63.63% 833 King 211 94.20% 13 5.80%00.00% 0 0.00% 198 88.39% 224 Kinney 357 67.11% 175 32.89%00.00% 0 0.00% 182 34.21% 532 Kleberg 1,488 87.12% 156 9.13%613.57% 3 0.18% 1,332 77.99% 1,708 Knox 1,823 91.15% 171 8.55%10.05% 5 0.25% 1,652 82.60% 2,000 Lamar 5,621 94.65% 308 5.19%100.17% 0 0.00% 5,313 89.46% 5,939 Lamb 2,320 88.21% 300 11.41%40.15% 6 0.23% 2,020 76.81% 2,630 Lampasas 1,462 91.43% 134 8.38%30.19% 0 0.00% 1,328 83.05% 1,599 La Salle 704 90.49% 74 9.51%00.00% 0 0.00% 630 80.98% 778 Lavaca 2,204 84.12% 403 15.38%100.38% 3 0.11% 1,801 68.74% 2,620 Lee 1,155 80.94% 271 18.99%00.00% 1 0.07% 884 61.95% 1,427 Leon 1,748 94.69% 97 5.25%00.00% 1 0.05% 1,651 89.44% 1,846 Liberty 2,813 91.69% 244 7.95%60.20% 5 0.16% 2,569 83.74% 3,068 Limestone 3,857 95.05% 196 4.83%40.10% 1 0.02% 3,661 90.22% 4,058 Lipscomb 973 77.65% 273 21.79%40.32% 3 0.24% 700 55.87% 1,253 Live Oak 874 76.33% 231 20.17%322.79% 8 0.70% 643 56.16% 1,145 Llano 1,302 92.41% 107 7.59%00.00% 0 0.00% 1,195 84.81% 1,409 Loving 118 72.39% 21 12.88%1911.66% 5 3.07% 97 59.51% 163 Lubbock 6,425 90.97% 622 8.81%110.16% 5 0.07% 5,803 82.16% 7,063 Lynn 1,983 91.89% 169 7.83%00.00% 6 0.28% 1,814 84.06% 2,158 McCulloch 1,722 83.55% 323 15.67%70.34% 9 0.44% 1,399 67.88% 2,061 McLennan 12,489 90.77% 1,116 8.11%1150.84% 39 0.28% 11,373 82.66% 13,759 McMullen 265 87.75% 37 12.25%00.00% 0 0.00% 228 75.50% 302 Madison 1,127 96.16% 45 3.84%00.00% 0 0.00% 1,082 92.32% 1,172 Marion 919 87.69% 129 12.31%00.00% 0 0.00% 790 75.38% 1,048 Martin 775 90.75% 70 8.20%80.94% 1 0.12% 705 82.55% 854 Mason 787 68.61% 359 31.30%10.09% 0 0.00% 428 37.31% 1,147 Matagorda 1,700 78.56% 459 21.21%30.14% 2 0.09% 1,241 57.35% 2,164 Maverick 890 81.20% 166 15.15%373.38% 3 0.27% 724 66.06% 1,096 Medina 2,050 67.63% 969 31.97%100.33% 2 0.07% 1,081 35.66% 3,031 Menard 734 86.05% 115 13.48%10.12% 3 0.35% 619 72.57% 853 Midland 1,229 86.06% 190 13.31%80.56% 1 0.07% 1,039 72.76% 1,428 Milam 4,077 93.02% 288 6.57%0"assumed" This zero vote total for Lemke is assumed given that no additional votes beyond the Géoelections total are required to give his figures as shown in America at the Polls.0.00% 18 0.41% 3,789 86.45% 4,383 Mills 1,005 85.90% 165 14.10%00.00% 0 0.00% 840 71.79% 1,170 Mitchell 2,035 91.21% 192 8.61%10.04% 3 0.13% 1,843 82.61% 2,231 Montague 2,789 89.16% 324 10.36%0"assumed"0.00% 15 0.48% 2,465 78.80% 3,128 Montgomery 2,443 92.61% 186 7.05%20.08% 7 0.27% 2,257 85.56% 2,638 Moore 583 92.39% 47 7.45%00.00% 1 0.16% 536 84.94% 631 Morris 1,220 95.91% 52 4.09%00.00% 0 0.00% 1,168 91.82% 1,272 Motley 867 92.93% 64 6.86%10.11% 1 0.11% 803 86.07% 933 Nacogdoches 4,075 95.01% 209 4.87%20.05% 3 0.07% 3,866 90.14% 4,289 Navarro 5,815 95.02% 293 4.79%90.15% 3 0.05% 5,522 90.23% 6,120 Newton 1,111 92.12% 93 7.71%10.08% 1 0.08% 1,018 84.41% 1,206 Nolan 2,913 91.15% 268 8.39%110.34% 4 0.13% 2,645 82.76% 3,196 Nueces 6,597 83.09% 1,234 15.54%1041.31% 5 0.06% 5,363 67.54% 7,940 Ochiltree 1,111 88.03% 109 8.64%413.25% 1 0.08% 1,002 79.40% 1,262 Oldham 437 94.59% 20 4.33%51.08% 0 0.00% 417 90.26% 462 Orange 2,281 92.01% 190 7.66%30.12% 5 0.20% 2,091 84.35% 2,479 Palo Pinto 2,738 87.67% 371 11.88%90.29% 5 0.16% 2,367 75.79% 3,123 Panola 2,425 95.36% 95 3.74%10.04% 22 0.87% 2,330 91.62% 2,543 Parker 2,493 86.08% 375 12.95%130.45% 15 0.52% 2,118 73.14% 2,896 Parmer 936 86.83% 135 12.52%40.37% 3 0.28% 801 74.30% 1,078 Pecos 1,330 88.79% 167 11.15%00.00% 1 0.07% 1,163 77.64% 1,498 Polk 1,618 91.93% 141 8.01%00.00% 1 0.06% 1,477 83.92% 1,760 Potter 6,496 84.99% 1,018 13.32%1171.53% 12 0.16% 5,478 71.67% 7,643 Presidio 938 89.42% 106 10.10%20.19% 3 0.29% 832 79.31% 1,049 Rains 676 91.23% 63 8.50%10.13% 1 0.13% 613 82.73% 741 Randall 1,656 91.80% 142 7.87%30.17% 3 0.17% 1,514 83.92% 1,804 Reagan 477 87.85% 66 12.15%00.00% 0 0.00% 411 75.69% 543 Real 210 79.25% 55 20.75%00.00% 0 0.00% 155 58.49% 265 Red River 2,685 93.00% 199 6.89%00.00% 3 0.10% 2,486 86.11% 2,887 Reeves 1,127 91.70% 100 8.14%10.08% 1 0.08% 1,027 83.56% 1,229 Refugio 1,058 81.07% 242 18.54%50.38% 0 0.00% 816 62.53% 1,305 Roberts 426 94.04% 27 5.96%00.00% 0 0.00% 399 88.08% 453 Robertson 2,633 96.77% 86 3.16%20.07% 0 0.00% 2,547 93.61% 2,721 Rockwall 1,168 97.74% 26 2.18%10.08% 0 0.00% 1,142 95.56% 1,195 Runnels 2,985 89.99% 313 9.44%100.30% 9 0.27% 2,672 80.55% 3,317 Rusk 6,107 93.27% 433 6.61%40.06% 4 0.06% 5,674 86.65% 6,548 Sabine 1,216 91.70% 108 8.14%00.00% 2 0.15% 1,108 83.56% 1,326 San Augustine 1,054 94.28% 64 5.72%00.00% 0 0.00% 990 88.55% 1,118 San Jacinto 564 89.38% 67 10.62%00.00% 0 0.00% 497 78.76% 631 San Patricio 2,213 81.21% 482 17.69%240.88% 6 0.22% 1,731 63.52% 2,725 San Saba 1,505 90.99% 147 8.89%10.06% 1 0.06% 1,358 82.10% 1,654 Schleicher 469 85.58% 78 14.23%00.00% 1 0.18% 391 71.35% 548 Scurry 1,746 91.32% 162 8.47%30.16% 1 0.05% 1,584 82.85% 1,912 Shackelford 1,153 88.35% 152 11.65%00.00% 0 0.00% 1,001 76.70% 1,305 Shelby 3,167 95.62% 136 4.11%00.00% 9 0.27% 3,031 91.52% 3,312 Sherman 568 94.35% 34 5.65%00.00% 0 0.00% 534 88.70% 602 Smith 7,116 91.37% 660 8.47%60.08% 6 0.08% 6,456 82.90% 7,788 Somervell 317 83.86% 57 15.08%30.79% 1 0.26% 260 68.78% 378 Starr 2,289 87.43% 320 12.22%30.11% 6 0.23% 1,969 75.21% 2,618 Stephens 2,380 77.27% 681 22.11%130.42% 6 0.19% 1,699 55.16% 3,080 Sterling 384 96.48% 14 3.52%00.00% 0 0.00% 370 92.96% 398 Stonewall 1,001 94.34% 59 5.56%00.00% 1 0.09% 942 88.78% 1,061 Sutton 398 86.15% 64 13.85%00.00% 0 0.00% 334 72.29% 462 Swisher 1,453 90.98% 140 8.77%30.19% 1 0.06% 1,313 82.22% 1,597 Tarrant 29,791 88.24% 3,781 11.20%1390.41% 51 0.15% 26,010 77.04% 33,762 Taylor 6,169 89.43% 678 9.83%60.09% 45 0.65% 5,491 79.60% 6,898 Terrell 324 79.41% 84 20.59%00.00% 0 0.00% 240 58.82% 408 Terry 1,619 94.18% 87 5.06%110.64% 2 0.12% 1,532 89.12% 1,719 Throckmorton 949 87.63% 132 12.19%10.09% 1 0.09% 817 75.44% 1,083 Titus 1,872 95.90% 77 3.94%00.00% 3 0.15% 1,795 91.96% 1,952 Tom Green 4,803 87.34% 627 11.40%500.91% 19 0.35% 4,176 75.94% 5,499 Travis 12,092 90.07% 1,154 8.60%1411.05% 38 0.28% 10,938 81.47% 13,425 Trinity 1,196 88.72% 151 11.20%10.07% 0 0.00% 1,045 77.52% 1,348 Tyler 1,076 90.27% 116 9.73%00.00% 0 0.00% 960 80.54% 1,192 Upshur 2,243 87.38% 321 12.50%0"assumed"0.00% 3 0.12% 1,922 74.87% 2,567 Upton 728 89.54% 81 9.96%20.25% 2 0.25% 647 79.58% 813 Uvalde 1,743 83.08% 354 16.87%10.05% 0 0.00% 1,389 66.21% 2,098 Val Verde 1,262 71.26% 504 28.46%30.17% 2 0.11% 758 42.80% 1,771 Van Zandt 3,257 92.24% 245 6.94%110.31% 18 0.51% 3,012 85.30% 3,531 Victoria 2,081 85.46% 352 14.46%2The figures for this county are different from those in Géoelections because America at the Polls suggests there must have been five or six fewer Lemke votes than the Géoelections sum.0.08% 0 0.00% 1,729 71.01% 2,435 Walker 1,715 96.02% 69 3.86%00.00% 2 0.11% 1,646 92.16% 1,786 Waller 889 88.72% 111 11.08%00.00% 2 0.20% 778 77.64% 1,002 Ward 1,113 91.76% 98 8.08%20.16% 0 0.00% 1,015 83.68% 1,213 Washington 1,993 91.72% 176 8.10%10.05% 3 0.14% 1,817 83.62% 2,173 Webb 3,594 83.78% 696 16.22%00.00% 0 0.00% 2,898 67.55% 4,290 Wharton 3,034 90.43% 307 9.15%70.21% 7 0.21% 2,727 81.28% 3,355 Wheeler 2,415 89.38% 277 10.25%80.30% 2 0.07% 2,138 79.13% 2,702 Wichita 9,428 87.39% 1,327 12.30%200.19% 13 0.12% 8,101 75.09% 10,788 Wilbarger 3,279 90.76% 316 8.75%150.42% 3 0.08% 2,963 82.01% 3,613 Willacy 1,002 71.62% 376 26.88%191.36% 2 0.14% 626 44.75% 1,399 Williamson 4,995 92.79% 375 6.97%30.06% 10 0.19% 4,620 85.83% 5,383 Wilson 2,573 89.84% 286 9.99%10.03% 4 0.14% 2,287 79.85% 2,864 Winkler 903 92.62% 63 6.46%40.41% 5 0.51% 840 86.15% 975 Wise 2,737 88.58% 348 11.26%20.06% 3 0.10% 2,389 77.31% 3,090 Wood 2,751 93.25% 192 6.51%10.03% 6 0.20% 2,559 86.75% 2,950 Yoakum 227 92.65% 13 5.31%31.22% 2 0.82% 214 87.35% 245 Young 3,065 90.65% 304 8.99%70.21% 5 0.15% 2,761 81.66% 3,381 Zapata 282 89.24% 34 10.76%00.00% 0 0.00% 248 78.48% 316 Zavala 788 78.64% 209 20.86%30.30% 2 0.20% 579 57.78% 1,002Totals739,90087.06%104,66112.32%3,1870.38%1,583"excluded"0.19%635,23974.79%849,845 Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican Gillespie Kendall See also United States presidential elections in Texas Notes References Texas 1936 Category:1936 Texas elections