1812 Ventura earthquake

Earthquake in present-day California yes 1 dead Yes Yes 8 California Ruins of Mission La Purisima Concepcion, ca.1885-1904 (CHS-1803).jpg The ruins of Mission La Purisima Concepcion Black-and-white photograph of the crumbled exterior adobe ruins of Mission La Purísima Concepción, roofless with thick walls, standing grasses w y 7.0–7.5 11:00 PST December 21, 1812 ushis32 USA California yes California 34.28 -119.3 100 San Buenaventura top Green pog.svg California 34.1 -118.11 100 San Gabriel Green pog.svg California 33.5 -117.66 100 San Juan Capistrano left Green pog.svg California 32.78 -117.11 100 San Diego bottom Green pog.svg California 34.2 -119.9 Bullseye1.png 40 290 center infobox 34.2 N 119.9 W type:eventAlthough this figure is commonly cited, it is possible the earthquake occurred on an inland fault The 1812 Ventura earthquake (also known as the Santa Barbara earthquake) occurred on December 21 at 11:00 PST, affecting present-day southern California. It caused severe damage to many buildings and Spanish missions in the Santa Barbara and Ventura areas. One person was killed and several were injured; further casualties were avoided because residents were alerted and fled buildings after a foreshock occurred 15 minutes prior. Survivors reported a tsunami along the coast and a possible report also came from Hawaii. The tsunami also carried a brig anchored near Gaviota Pass half a mile inland before bringing it out to sea. This earthquake occurred 13 days after the December 8 San Juan Capistrano earthquake. The source of the earthquake is debated among geologists between the San Andreas Fault or a fault in or near the Santa Barbara Channel, like the San Cayetano Fault. At an excavation site along the San Cayetano Fault, radiocarbon dating constrained the date of a surface rupturing earthquake to between 1660 and before the late 19th century with preference at the end of the time window, coinciding with the December 21 earthquake, making it a possible source fault. Estimates of the magnitude range from w y 7.0–7.5 based on measured thrust slip of 14–17 ft at the site. Earthquake Thrust tectonics Transverse Ranges San Andreas Fault thumb|The San Andreas Fault in California|alt=Map of California highlighting the trace of the San Andreas Fault extending northwestward from the Inland Empire in Southern California to near or off the coast in Northern California In a 2002 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (BSSA) article, researchers suggests the December 21 earthquake may have been caused by a westward-propagating rupture on the San Andreas Fault triggered by the December 8 event. Developing on earlier research from 1988, they postulated that both earthquakes occurred on two halves of a 105.6 mi 3 fault rupture.Authors of the 1988 research do not support rupture on the San Andreas Fault during the December 21 event The December 8 event ruptured 62 mi of the eastern segment while the December 21 event ruptured the western segment for 43.5 mi. Based on the rupture length, researchers estimated a moment magnitude of 7.0 to 7.2. As for reports of a tsunami along the Santa Barbara coast, it was possibly triggered by a large submarine landslide in the Santa Barbara Channel. The Mojave segment would re-rupture during the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake, overlapping the 1812 rupture zones, and representing the central and southern part of the 1857 rupture.T. R. Toppozada D. M. Branum M. S. Reichle C. L. Hallstrom 2002 San Andreas Fault Zone, California: M≥5.5 Earthquake History http://activetectonics.asu.edu/bidart/bibliography/bssa/bssa_paleoseismology_2002/toppozada_branum_reichle_hallstrom_2002.pdf Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 92 7 2555–2601 10.1785/0120000614 2002BuSSA..92.2555T The 1988 report under Science used dendrochronology to provide evidence of coseismic rupture on the San Andreas Fault during the December 8 event rather than the one on December 21. Nine trees within 66 ft of the San Andreas Fault near Wrightwood showed severe long-term growth stunt from 1813 onwards with some taking more than 50 years to recover. Two trees exhibited complete crown loss while another experienced partial loss. Drought was ruled out as a cause because it usually causes stunts lasting a year whereas the stunt at the sampled trees continued for several decades. The selective and spatially tight distribution of tree damage also eliminated lightning, strong winds, ice storms, fire, diseases or pest infestation as possible causes. The 1812 growth rings were complete and did not show trauma, but growth rings from 1813 exhibited the growth stunt; this suggested the event occurred after the growing season ended, usually in September, and before the next growing season, in March or April of 1813. A plausible cause was narrowed to root systems severed by the right-lateral strike-slip motion on the San Andreas Fault and related ground warping. The severed roots greatly reduced the trees' ability to intake water and nutrients until new roots formed decades later. They estimated that the December 8 event ruptured a 105.6 mi 3 section of the fault extending southeastwards from Tejon Pass. The authors argued against a San Andreas rupture for the December 21 earthquake. First, aftershocks were felt locally in Santa Barbara suggesting a nearby coastal fault was responsible. Second is the lack of damage at Santa Barbara during the much larger 1857 earthquake despite slip on a section of the fault close to the city.Gordon C. Jacoby Paul R. Sheppard Kerry E. Sieh Kerry Sieh 8 July 1988 Irregular Recurrence of Large Earthquakes Along the San Andreas Fault: Evidence from Trees https://www.ltrr.arizona.edu/~sheppard/geomorph/jss.pdf Science 241 4862 196–199 10.1126/science.241.4862.196 17841050 1988Sci...241..196J 28944224 San Cayetano Fault thumb|The San Cayetano Fault in Southern California |alt= Map of California highlighting the trace of the San Cayetano Fault as a short, east–west trending line north of Ventura and the Santa Barbara Channel in Southern California In another BSSA article, geologists conducted a paleoseismic study along the San Cayetano Fault and found evidence of recent surface ruptures that could correspond with the earthquake. Located northwest of Los Angeles, the San Cayetano Fault is a 25 mi long east–west striking, north-dipping reverse fault comprising eastern and western lobe-shaped segments. It actively accommodates north–south crustal shortening of the Ventura Basin with its extension along the basin's northern margin. At the southern basin margin, the south-dipping Oak Ridge Fault also accommodates this deformation. The fault's western lobe ends just east of Ojai, while at Fillmore, a 2.5 mi wide geometric step breaks the fault into two segments. The eastern segment runs just west of Piru before terminating several kilometers to its east. With an average slip rate of 0.29 ± 0.12 in per year, the San Cayetano Fault, particularly its eastern lobe, is one of the fastest-slipping reverse faults in southern California. Due to its high slip rate, it was identified as one of six fault zones in Greater Los Angeles that can potentially cause a magnitude 7.2 or larger earthquake.Dolan James F. Rockwell Thomas K. Q97924725 The trenching site was on a segment of the fault about 1.2 mi west–southwest of Piru. It cuts through a fault scarp in an active alluvial zone, revealing 14 ft, and potentially up to 17 ft of reverse slip that formed during a large earthquake. Radiocarbon dating of detritus charcoal constrained the date of this event to no earlier than 1660 while the lack of topsoil also capped the upper-bound range at 1813, consistent with the December 21 earthquake. Empirical scaling relationships between slip and magnitude indicate that such a displacement corresponds to an earthquake larger than w 7.0 and possibly approaching w 7.5. Because two shocks were reported within 15 minutes, the rupture may have been multi-segmented, breaking across geometric boundaries separating both segments. Stress triggering A 1981 United States Geological Survey report suggested that an earthquake in the Santa Barbara Channel,Toppozada Tousson R. Real Charles R. Bezore Stephen P. Parker David L. Preparation of isoseismal maps and summaries of reported effects for pre-1900 California earthquakes 1981 U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 81-262 10.3133/ofr81262 about 6.2–12.4 mi southwest of the location of the 1925 Santa Barbara earthquake, could explain the damage. An epicenter in the channel has been generally assumed for this earthquake.34.2 N 119.9 W type:event These coordinates are adopted by the infobox map Reports of a tsunami would suggest the earthquake was caused by thrust faulting, similar to the 1978 Santa Barbara earthquake which was caused by left-lateral and thrust slip on a north-dipping fault, but that would require a w 7.7 earthquake which is unsupported by the relatively small area where Modified Mercalli intensity VII shaking was observed. In a 1996 Geophysical Research Letters article, researchers modelled a Coulomb stress scenario for the December 8 earthquake along the Mojave segment of the San Andreas Fault terminating at Pallett Creek. The model calculated positive Coulomb stress increase in faults in the adjacent Santa Barbara and Ventura areas, especially on shallow-dipping thrust and oblique-thrust, or northwest-trending faults. Thus, they concluded that the Mojave rupture may have promoted, advanced by several years to decades, and triggered the December 21 earthquake. These stress changes brought faults that were already highly stressed closer to rupturing, hence the December 21 shock was likely triggered by the earlier event on a highly strained fault. They also modelled a scenario earthquake on the Coachella Valley and San Bernardino segments and found that it promoted stress on shallow-dipping thrust faults and northwest-trending right-lateral strike-slip faults beneath Greater Los Angeles.Deng Jishu Sykes Lynn R. Lynn Sykes Triggering of 1812 Santa Barbara Earthquake by a Great San Andreas Shock Implications for future seismic hazards in southern California Geophysical Research Letters 1996 23 10 1155–1158 10.1029/96GL00738 1996GeoRL..23.1155D The San Cayetano Fault was also located in the area of increased stress, as were the faults in the channel, though to a lesser extent. Tsunami Reports of a tsunami only appeared in written records "many years" after the event and were based on survivors' memory. The tsunami, which affected at least 55 mi of the coast between Santa Barbara and Ventura, was likely triggered by a submarine landslide in the channel. Its wave amplitude was estimated at 8.5 ft in Gaviota, and 3 ft in Santa Barbara and Ventura. The tsunami had run-ups as high as 13 ft at El Refugio, about 40 km west of Santa Barbara, compared to 6.7 ft at Santa Barbara and Ventura.Borrero Jose C. Dolan James F. Synolakis Costas Emmanuel Tsunamis within the Eastern Santa Barbara Channel Geophysical Research Letters 2001 28 4 643–646 10.1029/2000GL011980 2001GeoRL..28..643B 129929406 free At Santa Barbara, the tsunami may have inundated the San Miguel Chapel which was situated 15 ft above sea level.Lander James F. Lockridge Patricia A Kozuch Michael J. Tsunamis affecting the West Coast of the United States, 1806–1992 1993 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Geophysical Data Center KGRD no. 29 20 https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/13442 The waves carried the Charon, an illegal fur-trading brig anchored offshore near Gaviota Pass, about half a mile inland before bringing it back to the sea.Rasmussen Cecilia 9 January 2005 1812 California Tsunami Carried a Ship Inland Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-jan-09-me-then9-story.html 23 November 2020 A possible 6–14 ft run-up was reported at Hoʻokena in Kona, Hawaii.Doak Cox estimated the timing of the event to between December 18 and 23 according to independent analysis of contemporary diaries and "information on the Hawaiian calendar and religious practice" Wave height reports of 50 ft at Gaviota, 30–35 ft at Santa Barbara, and over 10 ft at Ventura are likely exaggerated. Impact thumb|Interior ruins of the chapel at Mission La Purisima |alt= Black-and-white photo of the interior ruins of a chapel at Mission La Purísima Concepción. The adobe brick walls are cracked, timber beams are the only components of the roof, exposing the interior to the sky, while debris and dirt litter the floor. There are shrubs growing from the ground near the corners of the chapel. Two shocks were reported; the foreshock occurred 15 minutes before the mainshock at 11:00 (however Coffman and others put the time of the foreshock at 10:30Earthquake History of the United States Jerry L. Coffman 1982 Carl A. Von Hake Carl W. Stover Report Publication 41–1 Boulder, CO U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey https://pubs.usgs.gov/unnumbered/70114182/report.pdf) was credited with preventing further casualties as it frightened many people who eventually fled from buildings. One person was killed and several in Purisima were injured.Soloviev S. L. Go Ch. N. Katalog tsunami na vostochnom poberezh'e tikhogo okeana 1984 Canadian Translation of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 5078 200 https://waves-vagues.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/library-bibliotheque/61161.pdf Catalogue of Tsunamis on the Eastern Shore of the Pacific Ocean (1513–1968)Stover Carl W Jerry L Coffman 1993 Seismicity of the United States, 1568–1989 (revised) https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1527/report.pdf U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527 United States Government Printing Office, Washington The mainshock was assigned a maximum Modified Mercalli intensity of VIII (Severe). Every building of Mission Santa Barbara and the fort were cracked, and a chapel was destroyed. All the buildings in the Presidio of Santa Barbara were uninhabitable. At Purisima, a church collapsed while all of the 100 Indian homes made of adobe and tiles were collapsed or were cracked. Several buildings in Lompoc were "flattened to the ground" while the church at Mission La Purisima was heavily damaged. The damage in Mission Santa Inés was less severe compared to those at Missions Santa Barbara and La Purisima, though many homes were destroyed and a church partially collapsed. Some building damage was also reported in Mission San Buenaventura and Mission San Fernando. Thirty reinforcement beams braced the walls of Mission San Fernando against collapse. Due to fears of a tsunami, the residents of Ventura relocated 1–2 mi inland until the following April. The Chumash people on Santa Rosa Island also relocated after the tsunami.Meyers Talya 2 August 2017 Potential Earthquake Worries in Santa Barbara Channel Santa Barbara Independent https://www.independent.com/2017/08/02/potential-earthquake-worries-santa-barbara-channel/ 23 November 2020 Severe aftershocks were reported through February and weaker ones felt through April. See also 1927 Lompoc earthquake List of earthquakes in California List of earthquakes in the United States Notes References Category:Earthquakes in California Category:1812 earthquakes Category:1812 in Nueva California Category:1810s in Nueva California Category:History of San Bernardino County, California Category:History of Southern California Earthquake Category:December 1812 Category:1812 in New Spain Category:Spanish missions in California Category:Tsunamis in the United States Category:Geology of San Bernardino County, California Category:19th-century tsunamis