411 REFERENCE · Wikipedia
1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut
Reference material by Wikipedia contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
none
June 2025
September 2023
1928 United States presidential election
1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut Connecticut presidential no 1924 United States presidential election in Connecticut 1924 1932 United States presidential election in Connecticut 1932 90.78%https://collections.ctdigitalarchive.org/node/6285 Connecticut State Register and Manual, 1929, Page 532 CT State Library November 6, 1928 x200px Herbert Hoover - NARA - 532049.jpg Herbert Hoover Republican Party (United States) California Charles Curtis 7 296,641 53.63% Unsuccessful 1928.jpg Al Smith Democratic Party (United States) New York Joseph Taylor Robinson 0 252,085 45.57% 251px County results 251px Municipality results Hoover
#e27f90 50–60%
#CC2F4A 60–70%
#D40000 70–80%
#AA0000 80–90%
Smith
#B9D7FF 40–50%
#86b6f2 50–60%
#4389E3 60–70%
#1666CB 70–80% President Calvin Coolidge Republican Party (United States) Herbert Hoover Republican Party (United States)
The 1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut took place on November 6, 1928, as part of the 1928 United States presidential election which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose seven representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
During the Third Party System, Connecticut was one of a small number of critical swing states due to its opposing Democratic Catholic and Republican Yankee populations being closely matched at the polls.Phillips Kevin P. The Emerging Republican Majority November 23, 2014 30–34 Princeton University Press 978-0-691-16324-6 However, the fear William Jennings Bryan generated amongst the northeastern industrial elite,Reichley A. James Faith in Politics 2004 201 Brookings Institution Press 0815773749 and among Catholic voters who belonged to a church that condemned free silver,Harpine William D. From the Front Porch to the Front Page: McKinley and Bryan in the 1896 Presidential Campaign 2005 166–167 Texas A & M University Press 9781585444502 meant that after the “Panic of 1893” Connecticut became substantially a one-party Republican state, although not to the same degree as many states in upper New England, the Midwest or the Pacific.Burnham Walter Dean The System of 1896 Kleppner Paul The Evolution of American Electoral Systems 176–179 0-313-21379-8 1971 Bloomsbury Academic No Democrat would serve as a United States Senator from the state during the “System of 1896”, and only one Democrat would serve as Governor — the aging Simeon E. Baldwin.
In 1920 and 1924 Democratic nominees James M. Cox and John W. Davis had carried only one and three towns respectively in Connecticut, with Southern Democrat Davis winning only 27.53 percent of the state's vote. However, in 1928, the Democratic Party nominated Alfred E. Smith, a New York City-born Roman Catholic of Irish, Italian, and German immigrant heritage, who appealed greatly to the urban ethnic and Catholic immigrant populations that populated northeastern states like Connecticut.Lichtman Allan J. Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928 2000 93–96 Lexington Books 0739101269 Smith was the first Catholic ever to be nominated for president on a major party presidential ticket, and while his Catholicism greatly weakened his candidacy in many rural parts of the United States, especially in the traditionally Democratic “Solid South” and the pro-La FolletteAfter La Follette, who in 1924 won one-sixth of the national vote and almost one-third in the one-party Republican Pacific States, died in June 1925, his family endorsed Smith.Menendez Albert J. The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004 2005 59 McFarland 0786422173 Pacific Northwest,Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 502 1400852293 Catholics across the United States identified with him greatly.
In straw poll from late September, Republican nominees, former Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover of California and Senate Majority Leader Charles Curtis of Kansas, was narrowly leading Smith and Senator Joseph Taylor Robinson of Arkansas.The Pathfinder's Straw Vote Santa Cruz Evening News Santa Cruz, California September 28, 1928 3 However, another straw poll from early October saw Hoover leading Smith in Connecticut by more than two-to-one,Hoover Leads Digest Poll — Smith Has Slight Lead in Arkansas, Only Southern Listed The Huntington Herald Huntington, Indiana October 5, 1928 1 and a similar result was obtained in a larger poll mid-month.Here's More About Hoover Leads The Huntington Herald Huntington, Indiana October 19, 1928 8 The Boston Globe in the second week also saw Hoover carrying the state,Morgan James The Political Tide: The 20 States That Will Decide the Election The Boston Globe Boston, Massachusetts October 10, 1928 18 as did a later poll that nonetheless thought Smith was helped in Connecticut by his opposition to Prohibition.Babson's Statistics Do Not Assure G.O.P. Governor Is Gaining — Kentucky Supporters Will Probably Turn State for New Yorker and Strength in Missouri Increased; Statistician Declares Smith's Popularity Steadily Increasing October 21, 1928 The Bristol Herald-Courier Bristol, Tennessee B1
Hoover ultimately won Connecticut by 8.06 percentage points; however, this was a major Democratic advance on the 1920 and 1924 results when the Republicans won by 34 and 30 points respectively, with Smith carrying seventeen towns that voted for Calvin Coolidge in 1924. Most critically, Smith carried the four most populous towns of Hartford,As of the 2020 presidential election, Hartford has never voted for a Republican presidential candidate since this election. New London, Bridgeport and Waterbury. He also became the first Democrat ever to carry the towns of Enfield and Putnam and the first since 1852 to carry Plainfield and Thompson, all of which were home to large Catholic populations. Whereas in 1924 Connecticut had been Coolidge's seventh-best state, in 1928 it was Catholic Smith's fourteenth-best state of forty-eight, and voted 9.36 points more Democratic than the nation at-large, this being the first time since 1892 that Connecticut had been more Democratic than the nation.
Results
1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut1928 Presidential General Election Results — Connecticut http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1928&fips=9&f=1&off=0&elect=0&minper=0 U.S. Election Atlas 23 December 2013
Republican Party (United States)
Herbert Hoover
California
Charles Curtis
Kansas
296,641
53.63%
7
100.00%
Democratic Party (United States)
Al Smith
New York
Joseph Taylor Robinson
Arkansas
252,085
45.57%
0
0.00%
Socialist Party of America
Norman Thomas
New York
James Hudson Maurer
Pennsylvania
3,029
0.55%
0
0.00%
Communist Party USA
William Z. Foster
Massachusetts
Benjamin Gitlow
New York
738
0.13%
0
0.00%
Socialist Labor Party of America
Verne L. Reynolds
Michigan
Jeremiah D. Crowley
New York
625
0.10%
0
0.00%
N/A
Others
Others
6
0.01%
0
0.00%
553,124
100.00%
7
100.00%
By county
1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut (by county)1928 Statement of Vote https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/sots/electionservices/statementofvote_pdfs/1928sovpdf.pdf CT.gov - Connecticut's Official State Website 8 January 2023 13–14 County Hoover % Hoover # Smith % Smith # Others % Others # Margin % Margin # Total #Fairfield55.8%71,38843.4%55,4880.8%1,04315,90012.4%127,919Hartford53.2%75,99746.0%65,7890.8%1,16710,2087.2%142,953Litchfield63.7%19,15435.8%10,7610.5%1388,39327.9%30,053Middlesex59.9%11,20439.5%7,3800.6%1123,82420.4%18,696New Haven49.1%80,95250.1%82,6230.9%1,435-1,671-1.0%165,010New London56.3%21,37842.9%16,2970.8%2885,08113.4%37,963Tolland59.8%6,50239.1%4,2551.1%1252,24720.7%10,882Windham51.4%10,03948.3%9,4470.3%635923.1%19,549
By town
1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut (by town)Town Herbert Clark HooverRepublican Alfred Emmanuel Smith Democratic Norman Mattoon ThomasSocialist William Zebulon FosterCommunist Verne L. ReynoldsSocialist Labor Margin Total votes cast # % # % # % # % # % # % Andover 126 61.46% 78 38.05% 1 0.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 48 23.41% 205 Ansonia 3,209 49.05% 3,269 49.97% 51 0.78% 5 0.08% 8 0.12% -60 -0.92% 6,542 Ashford 145 54.31% 120 44.94% 2 0.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 25 9.36% 267 Avon 369 67.34% 172 31.39% 5 0.91% 1 0.18% 1 0.18% 197 35.95% 548 Barkhamsted 241 78.25% 66 21.43% 1 0.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 175 56.82% 308 Beacon Falls 310 57.94% 217 40.56% 1 0.19% 7 1.31% 0 0.00% 93 17.38% 535 Berlin 1,032 66.11% 521 33.38% 2 0.13% 4 0.26% 2 0.13% 511 32.74% 1,561 Bethany 119 74.38% 40 25.00% 1 0.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 79 49.38% 160 Bethel 1,313 68.92% 588 30.87% 4 0.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 725 38.06% 1,905 Bethlehem 187 80.26% 46 19.74% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 141 60.52% 233 Bloomfield 683 60.98% 404 36.07% 18 1.61% 8 0.71% 7 0.63% 279 24.91% 1,120 Bolton 121 62.37% 73 37.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 48 24.74% 194 Bozrah 169 47.21% 186 51.96% 1 0.28% 1 0.28% 1 0.28% -17 -4.75% 358 Branford 1,826 64.32% 1,001 35.26% 6 0.21% 5 0.18% 1 0.04% 825 29.06% 2,839 Bridgeport 21,019 45.69% 24,448 53.14% 372 0.81% 85 0.18% 82 0.18% -3,429 -7.45% 46,006 Bridgewater 163 74.09% 56 25.45% 1 0.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 107 48.64% 220 Bristol 5,028 59.10% 3,404 40.01% 55 0.65% 16 0.19% 4 0.05% 1,624 19.09% 8,507 Brookfield 313 75.06% 104 24.94% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 209 50.12% 417 Brooklyn 346 49.50% 352 50.36% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -6 -0.86% 699 Burlington 205 65.50% 104 33.23% 2 0.64% 2 0.64% 0 0.00% 101 32.27% 313 Canaan 190 74.51% 65 25.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 125 49.02% 255 Canterbury 208 68.20% 92 30.16% 4 1.31% 1 0.33% 0 0.00% 116 38.03% 305 Canton 689 69.95% 291 29.54% 5 0.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 398 40.41% 985 Chaplin 119 75.32% 36 22.78% 2 1.27% 1 0.63% 0 0.00% 83 52.53% 158 Cheshire 941 75.22% 310 24.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 631 50.44% 1,251 Chester 387 64.50% 211 35.17% 2 0.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 176 29.33% 600 Clinton 521 74.64% 173 24.79% 4 0.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 348 49.86% 698 Colchester 373 54.93% 299 44.04% 6 0.88% 1 0.15% 0 0.00% 74 10.90% 679 Colebrook 181 73.58% 65 26.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 116 47.15% 246 Columbia 149 62.61% 87 36.55% 2 0.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 62 26.05% 238 Cornwall 298 76.02% 91 23.21% 3 0.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 207 52.81% 392 Coventry 465 63.87% 262 35.99% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 203 27.88% 728 Cromwell 659 69.22% 287 30.15% 1 0.11% 3 0.32% 2 0.21% 372 39.08% 952 Danbury 5,974 54.76% 4,895 44.87% 23 0.21% 13 0.12% 4 0.04% 1,079 9.89% 10,909 Darien 1,681 73.44% 598 26.12% 7 0.31% 0 0.00% 3 0.13% 1,083 47.31% 2,289 Derby 1,151 33.12% 2,294 66.01% 27 0.78% 2 0.06% 1 0.03% -1,143 -32.89% 3,475 Durham 360 79.65% 92 20.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 268 59.29% 452 East Granby 202 66.89% 97 32.12% 0 0.00% 2 0.66% 1 0.33% 105 34.77% 302 East Haddam 476 65.03% 253 34.56% 3 0.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 223 30.46% 732 East Hampton 713 55.57% 566 44.12% 2 0.16% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 147 11.46% 1,283 East Hartford 3,506 56.02% 2,725 43.54% 13 0.21% 6 0.10% 8 0.13% 781 12.48% 6,258 East Haven 1,506 63.95% 829 35.20% 13 0.55% 4 0.17% 3 0.13% 677 28.75% 2,355 East Lyme 617 73.10% 219 25.95% 7 0.83% 1 0.12% 0 0.00% 398 47.16% 844 East Windsor 757 61.85% 452 36.93% 13 1.06% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 305 24.92% 1,224 Eastford 171 83.01% 35 16.99% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 136 66.02% 206 Easton 282 75.00% 88 23.40% 5 1.33% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 194 51.60% 376 Ellington 473 60.72% 298 38.25% 4 0.51% 0 0.00% 4 0.51% 175 22.46% 779 Enfield 1,861 44.01% 2,362 55.85% 4 0.09% 2 0.05% 0 0.00% -501 -11.85% 4,229 Essex 918 73.91% 318 25.60% 4 0.32% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 600 48.31% 1,242 Fairfield 3,041 63.66% 1,698 35.55% 30 0.63% 4 0.08% 4 0.08% 1,343 28.11% 4,777 Farmington 1,008 54.02% 849 45.50% 9 0.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 159 8.52% 1,866 Franklin 142 72.82% 53 27.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 89 45.64% 195 Glastonbury 1,258 59.34% 852 40.19% 8 0.38% 2 0.09% 0 0.00% 406 19.15% 2,120 Goshen 185 82.96% 37 16.59% 1 0.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 148 66.37% 223 Granby 462 85.40% 78 14.42% 1 0.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 384 70.98% 541 Greenwich 6,413 65.29% 3,363 34.24% 38 0.39% 5 0.05% 3 0.03% 3,050 31.05% 9,822 Griswold 603 43.54% 778 56.17% 4 0.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -175 -12.64% 1,385 Groton 2,427 77.15% 704 22.38% 12 0.38% 3 0.10% 0 0.00% 1,723 54.77% 3,146 Guilford 886 68.63% 401 31.06% 2 0.15% 2 0.15% 0 0.00% 485 37.57% 1,291 Haddam 546 75.31% 176 24.28% 3 0.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 370 51.03% 725 Hamden 4,122 64.90% 2,163 34.06% 55 0.87% 3 0.05% 8 0.13% 1,959 30.85% 6,351 Hampton 177 79.37% 44 19.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.90% 133 59.64% 223 Hartford 25,351 43.75% 32,102 55.40% 280 0.48% 117 0.20% 101 0.17% -6,751 -11.65% 57,951 Hartland 108 81.82% 23 17.42% 0 0.00% 1 0.76% 0 0.00% 85 64.39% 132 Harwinton 220 76.39% 67 23.26% 1 0.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 153 53.13% 288 Hebron 193 64.12% 108 35.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 85 28.24% 301 Kent 312 68.12% 146 31.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 166 36.24% 458 Killingly 1,557 53.75% 1,334 46.05% 5 0.17% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 223 7.70% 2,897 Killingworth 99 64.71% 53 34.64% 1 0.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 46 30.07% 153 Lebanon 344 81.90% 75 17.86% 1 0.24% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 269 64.05% 420 Ledyard 261 83.92% 49 15.76% 1 0.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 212 68.17% 311 Lisbon 219 67.18% 105 32.21% 2 0.61% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 114 34.97% 326 Litchfield 979 65.18% 514 34.22% 6 0.40% 1 0.07% 2 0.13% 465 30.96% 1,502 Lyme 219 85.55% 34 13.28% 2 0.78% 0 0.00% 1 0.39% 185 72.27% 256 Madison 656 71.15% 264 28.63% 2 0.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 392 42.52% 922 Manchester 5,205 67.30% 2,473 31.98% 48 0.62% 6 0.08% 2 0.03% 2,732 35.32% 7,734 Mansfield 696 76.23% 209 22.89% 8 0.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 487 53.34% 913 Marlborough 70 47.62% 71 48.30% 3 2.04% 1 0.68% 2 1.36% -1 -0.68% 147 Meriden 8,204 52.46% 7,329 46.86% 71 0.45% 20 0.13% 15 0.10% 875 5.59% 15,639 Middlebury 366 80.26% 88 19.30% 2 0.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 278 60.96% 456 Middlefield 231 76.49% 70 23.18% 0 0.00% 1 0.33% 0 0.00% 161 53.31% 302 Middletown 3,980 51.18% 3,738 48.06% 37 0.48% 8 0.10% 14 0.18% 242 3.11% 7,777 Milford 3,536 67.82% 1,618 31.03% 48 0.92% 6 0.12% 6 0.12% 1,918 36.79% 5,214 Monroe 362 69.88% 151 29.15% 2 0.39% 0 0.00% 3 0.58% 211 40.73% 518 Montville 664 60.69% 425 38.85% 3 0.27% 2 0.18% 0 0.00% 239 21.85% 1,094 Morris 160 68.67% 73 31.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 87 37.34% 233 Naugatuck 2,459 46.59% 2,773 52.54% 24 0.45% 9 0.17% 13 0.25% -314 -5.95% 5,278 New Britain 10,116 50.34% 9,703 48.28% 222 1.10% 20 0.10% 35 0.17% 413 2.06% 20,096 New Canaan 1,298 67.53% 614 31.95% 6 0.31% 2 0.10% 2 0.10% 684 35.59% 1,922 New Fairfield 155 76.35% 48 23.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 107 52.71% 203 New Hartford 435 58.78% 304 41.08% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 131 17.70% 740 New Haven 24,898 42.87% 32,531 56.01% 490 0.84% 103 0.18% 58 0.10% -7,633 -13.14% 58,080 New London 4,668 51.61% 4,309 47.64% 53 0.59% 8 0.09% 6 0.07% 359 3.97% 9,044 New Milford 1,441 68.23% 659 31.20% 8 0.38% 3 0.14% 1 0.05% 782 37.03% 2,112 Newington 879 76.17% 262 22.70% 11 0.95% 1 0.09% 1 0.09% 617 53.47% 1,154 Newtown 663 52.45% 599 47.39% 1 0.08% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 64 5.06% 1,264 Norfolk 461 57.55% 340 42.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 121 15.11% 801 North Branford 231 65.25% 122 34.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.28% 109 30.79% 354 North Canaan 644 70.69% 264 28.98% 0 0.00% 1 0.11% 2 0.22% 380 41.71% 911 North Haven 960 77.80% 265 21.47% 8 0.65% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 695 56.32% 1,234 North Stonington 320 79.40% 79 19.60% 3 0.74% 1 0.25% 0 0.00% 241 59.80% 403 Norwalk 7,865 61.32% 4,867 37.95% 38 0.30% 15 0.12% 41 0.32% 2,998 23.37% 12,826 Norwich 5,329 47.53% 5,788 51.62% 77 0.69% 7 0.06% 12 0.11% -459 -4.09% 11,213 Old Lyme 398 72.63% 147 26.82% 2 0.36% 0 0.00% 1 0.18% 251 45.80% 548 Old Saybrook 459 65.20% 244 34.66% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 215 30.54% 704 Orange 469 84.20% 88 15.80% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 381 68.40% 557 Oxford 272 73.32% 98 26.42% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 174 46.90% 371 Plainfield 1,238 42.54% 1,659 57.01% 11 0.38% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% -421 -14.47% 2,910 Plainville 1,418 70.51% 581 28.89% 7 0.35% 2 0.10% 3 0.15% 837 41.62% 2,011 Plymouth 981 59.64% 654 39.76% 7 0.43% 3 0.18% 0 0.00% 327 19.88% 1,645 Pomfret 427 62.43% 256 37.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.15% 171 25.00% 684 Portland 950 55.33% 755 43.97% 11 0.64% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 195 11.36% 1,717 Preston 357 78.63% 95 20.93% 1 0.22% 1 0.22% 0 0.00% 262 57.71% 454 Prospect 138 73.80% 48 25.67% 1 0.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 90 48.13% 187 Putnam 1,289 46.07% 1,501 53.65% 8 0.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -212 -7.58% 2,798 Redding 488 69.12% 218 30.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 270 38.24% 706 Ridgefield 955 73.46% 341 26.23% 2 0.15% 2 0.15% 0 0.00% 614 47.23% 1,300 Rocky Hill 486 68.74% 216 30.55% 5 0.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 270 38.19% 707 Roxbury 180 64.29% 98 35.00% 1 0.36% 1 0.36% 0 0.00% 82 29.29% 280 Salem 87 71.90% 34 28.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 53 43.80% 121 Salisbury 841 70.85% 339 28.56% 5 0.42% 0 0.00% 2 0.17% 502 42.29% 1,187 Saybrook 584 63.27% 335 36.29% 3 0.33% 0 0.00% 1 0.11% 249 26.98% 923 Scotland 128 78.05% 36 21.95% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 92 56.10% 164 Seymour 1,433 70.07% 606 29.63% 3 0.15% 2 0.10% 1 0.05% 827 40.44% 2,045 Sharon 503 77.98% 137 21.24% 3 0.47% 2 0.31% 0 0.00% 366 56.74% 645 Shelton 1,959 57.47% 1,406 41.24% 30 0.88% 6 0.18% 8 0.23% 553 16.22% 3,409 Sherman 99 69.72% 40 28.17% 1 0.70% 1 0.70% 1 0.70% 59 41.55% 142 Simsbury 695 60.49% 450 39.16% 1 0.09% 1 0.09% 2 0.17% 245 21.32% 1,149 Somers 422 62.33% 252 37.22% 3 0.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 170 25.11% 677 South Windsor 459 56.60% 344 42.42% 6 0.74% 2 0.25% 0 0.00% 115 14.18% 811 Southbury 358 73.66% 127 26.13% 0 0.00% 1 0.21% 0 0.00% 231 47.53% 486 Southington 1,611 53.90% 1,369 45.80% 6 0.20% 2 0.07% 1 0.03% 242 8.10% 2,989 Sprague 365 40.92% 524 58.74% 3 0.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -159 -17.83% 892 Stafford 1,134 51.20% 1,060 47.86% 13 0.59% 2 0.09% 6 0.27% 74 3.34% 2,215 Stamford 10,014 54.84% 8,106 44.39% 71 0.39% 50 0.27% 20 0.11% 1,908 10.45% 18,261 Sterling 330 61.80% 202 37.83% 2 0.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 128 23.97% 534 Stonington 2,565 57.22% 1,876 41.85% 28 0.62% 7 0.16% 7 0.16% 689 15.37% 4,483 Stratford 4,089 67.13% 1,965 32.26% 23 0.38% 9 0.15% 5 0.08% 2,124 34.87% 6,091 Suffield 1,037 70.21% 438 29.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.14% 599 40.56% 1,477 Thomaston 1,058 63.62% 599 36.02% 6 0.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 459 27.60% 1,663 Thompson 716 48.44% 757 51.22% 3 0.20% 1 0.07% 1 0.07% -41 -2.77% 1,478 Tolland 256 58.99% 173 39.86% 3 0.69% 0 0.00% 2 0.46% 83 19.12% 434 Torrington 4,433 54.13% 3,702 45.21% 24 0.29% 23 0.28% 7 0.09% 731 8.93% 8,189 Trumbull 883 73.95% 305 25.54% 4 0.34% 1 0.08% 1 0.08% 578 48.41% 1,194 Union 81 76.42% 25 23.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 56 52.83% 106 Vernon 2,053 55.92% 1,544 42.06% 49 1.33% 11 0.30% 14 0.38% 509 13.87% 3,671 Voluntown 98 45.37% 115 53.24% 1 0.46% 2 0.93% 0 0.00% -17 -7.87% 216 Wallingford 2,663 52.05% 2,417 47.24% 28 0.55% 4 0.08% 4 0.08% 246 4.81% 5,116 Warren 86 66.15% 42 32.31% 2 1.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 44 33.85% 130 Washington 640 72.15% 245 27.62% 2 0.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 395 44.53% 887 Waterbury 13,846 41.43% 19,363 57.93% 163 0.49% 30 0.09% 20 0.06% -5,517 -16.51% 33,422 Waterford 1,153 72.93% 405 25.62% 20 1.27% 2 0.13% 1 0.06% 748 47.31% 1,581 Watertown 1,620 72.42% 610 27.27% 4 0.18% 3 0.13% 0 0.00% 1,010 45.15% 2,237 West Hartford 7,090 71.98% 2,721 27.62% 30 0.30% 6 0.06% 3 0.03% 4,369 44.36% 9,850 West Haven 5,703 57.09% 4,201 42.05% 55 0.55% 10 0.10% 21 0.21% 1,502 15.04% 9,990 Westbrook 322 73.18% 109 24.77% 7 1.59% 0 0.00% 2 0.45% 213 48.41% 440 Weston 257 73.43% 89 25.43% 2 0.57% 2 0.57% 0 0.00% 168 48.00% 350 Westport 1,628 67.52% 775 32.14% 4 0.17% 2 0.08% 2 0.08% 853 35.38% 2,411 Wethersfield 2,144 76.43% 649 23.14% 11 0.39% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 1,495 53.30% 2,805 Willington 333 78.72% 87 20.57% 1 0.24% 1 0.24% 1 0.24% 246 58.16% 423 Wilton 659 77.53% 185 21.76% 4 0.47% 1 0.12% 1 0.12% 474 55.76% 850 Winchester 2,128 59.54% 1,439 40.26% 3 0.08% 1 0.03% 3 0.08% 689 19.28% 3,574 Windham 2,571 46.68% 2,921 53.03% 15 0.27% 0 0.00% 1 0.02% -350 -6.35% 5,508 Windsor 1,873 65.31% 978 34.10% 12 0.42% 5 0.17% 0 0.00% 895 31.21% 2,868 Windsor Locks 395 26.33% 1,098 73.20% 4 0.27% 1 0.07% 2 0.13% -703 -46.87% 1,500 Wolcott 259 75.95% 78 22.87% 4 1.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 181 53.08% 341 Woodbridge 431 78.51% 117 21.31% 1 0.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 314 57.19% 549 Woodbury 590 84.17% 108 15.41% 1 0.14% 2 0.29% 0 0.00% 482 68.76% 701 Woodstock 618 85.60% 102 14.13% 1 0.14% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 516 71.47% 722Totals296,64153.63%252,08545.58%3,0300.55%7370.13%6160.11%44,5568.06%553,109
See also
United States presidential elections in Connecticut
Notes
References
expanded
Connecticut
1928
Category:1928 Connecticut elections