Skip to main content

  | मौसम…

411 समाचार
Public archive edition · Attributed source reporting with original dates · AI drafts are excluded

411 REFERENCE · Wikipedia

1916 United States presidential election in Alabama

Reference material by Wikipedia contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.

none June 2025 September 2023 1916 United States presidential election 1916 United States presidential election in Alabama Alabama presidential no 1912 United States presidential election in Alabama 1912 1920 United States presidential election in Alabama 1920 x160px File:Thomas Woodrow Wilson, Harris & Ewing bw photo portrait, 1919 (cropped 3x4).jpg Woodrow Wilson Democratic Party (United States) New Jersey Thomas R. Marshall 12 99,409 76.04% File:HUGHES, CHARLES E. HONORABLE LCCN2016857545 (restored) (3x4 crop).png Charles E. Hughes Republican Party (United States) New York Charles W. Fairbanks 0 28,662 21.92% President Woodrow Wilson Democratic Party (United States) Woodrow Wilson Democratic Party (United States) 1916 United States presidential election in Alabama results map by county.svg 300px County results Wilson #86b6f2 50–60% #4389e3 60–70% #1666cb 70–80% #0645b4 80–90% #002b84 90–100% Hughes #e27f90 50–60% 1916 11 7 The 1916 United States presidential election in Alabama took place on November 7, 1916, as part of the nationwide presidential election. State voters chose twelve representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president. Since the 1890s, Alabama had been effectively a one-party state ruled by the Democratic Party. Disenfranchisement of almost all African-Americans and a large proportion of poor whites via poll taxes, literacy testsPerman Michael Struggle for Mastery: Disfranchisement in the South, 1888–1908 University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill, NC 2001 Introduction 9780807849095 and extralegal violenceFeldman Glenn The Disfranchisement Myth: Poor Whites and Suffrage Restriction in Alabama 2004 157 University of Georgia Press 0820326151 had essentially eliminated opposition parties outside of Unionist Winston County and a few nearby northern hill counties that had been Populist strongholds.Webb Samuel L. From Independents to Populists to Progressive Republicans: The Case of Chilton County, Alabama, 1880-1920 The Journal of Southern History 59 4 707–736 10.2307/2210539 2210539 The only competitive statewide elections became Democratic Party primaries that were limited by law to white voters. Unlike the other Deep South states, however, soon after black disenfranchisement Alabama's white Republicans made rapid efforts to expel blacks from the state Republican Party.Heersink Jenkins Boris Jeffery A. Republican Party Politics and the American South, 1865-1968 251–253 9781107158436 2020 Cambridge University Press For the 1904 Convention, President Theodore Roosevelt rejected this proposal, unlike in North Carolina where he acquiesced without opposition to the demands of Jeter Connelly Pritchard. Oscar D. Street was appointed state party boss as part of the pro-Taft “black and tan” faction in 1912,Paul D. Casdorph Republicans, Negroes, and Progressives in the South, 1912-1916 The University of Alabama Press 1981 70, 94–95 0817300481 while Roosevelt planned “lily-whitism” for the South with his “Bull Moose” party after he broke from the GOP.Link Arthur S. The Negro as a Factor in the Campaign of 1912 The Journal of Negro History January 1947 32 1 81–99 The University of Chicago Press 10.2307/2715292 2715292 Roosevelt's personal popularity even in the overwhelmingly Democratic Deep South meant he easily outpolled Taft in the region,Link Arthur S. Theodore Roosevelt and the South in 1912 The North Carolina Historical Review July 1946 23 3 313–324 North Carolina Office of Archives and History and in Alabama this led the pro-Taft Street to move the state GOP in a lily-white direction much earlier than any other Deep South state.Heersink and Jenkins; Republican Party Politics and the American South, pp. 36-39 With President Wilson still popular, however, the shift to a lily-white Republican Party would have no effect on Alabama's presidential voting. An early poll in August saw incumbent President Woodrow Wilson (D–New Jersey), running with incumbent Vice President Thomas R. Marshall, with 24 votes, against Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Charles Evans Hughes (R–New York), running with former Vice President Charles W. Fairbanks, with five votes.Wilson Without the South August 25, 1916 The Buffalo Enquirer Buffalo, New York 4 All later forecasts showed the state going to Wilson,Steady Drift to Wilson, but Last 10 Days of Race Will Decide the Election The Washington Post Washington, District of Columbia 3, 16 October 29, 1916 and in the end the small August poll proved fairly accurate, with Wilson winning 76.04 percent of the vote to Hughes’ 21.92 percent.1916 The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/1916 www.presidency.ucsb.edu 7 February 2023 Wilson carried all but three counties, and his appeal to Progressive former Populists allowed him to carry one of the four counties — Cullman — that the “Bull Moose” party had won in 1912. Results 1916 United States presidential election in AlabamaDave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1916&fips=1&f=0&off=0&elect=0 1916 Presidential General Election Results – Alabama Woodrow Wilson (incumbent) Democratic Party (United States) 99,409 76.04% Charles Evans Hughes Republican Party (United States) 28,662 21.92% Allan L. Benson Socialist Party (United States) 1,916 1.47% Frank Hanly Prohibition Party 741 0.57% 129,987 100.00% Results by county CountyAlabama Official and Statistical Register 1919 State of Alabama Department of Archives and History Alabama Election Statistics Montgomery, AlabamaWoodrow WilsonDemocraticCharles Evans HughesRepublicanAllan L. BensonSocialistFrank HanlyProhibitionMarginTotal votes cast # % # % # % # % # % Autauga 773 87.05% 99 11.15% 11 1.24% 5 0.56% 674 75.90% 888 Baldwin 766 67.19% 216 18.95% 148 12.98% 10 0.88% 550 48.25% 1,140 Barbour 1,235 94.64% 45 3.45% 13 1.00% 12 0.92% 1,190 91.19% 1,305 Bibb 1,247 78.58% 217 13.67% 106 6.68% 17 1.07% 1,030 64.90% 1,587 Blount 1,488 54.13% 1,229 44.71% 26 0.95% 6 0.22% 259 9.42% 2,749 Bullock 743 99.20% 4 0.53% 2 0.27% 0 0.00% 739 98.66% 749 Butler 1,162 93.03% 78 6.24% 6 0.48% 3 0.24% 1,084 86.79% 1,249 Calhoun 2,231 81.81% 442 16.21% 29 1.06% 25 0.92% 1,789 65.60% 2,727 Chambers 1,679 89.88% 168 8.99% 7 0.37% 14 0.75% 1,511 80.89% 1,868 Cherokee 1,136 67.78% 508 30.31% 27 1.61% 5 0.30% 628 37.47% 1,676 Chilton 881 38.34% 1,363 59.31% 40 1.74% 14 0.61% -482 -20.97% 2,298 Choctaw 765 95.63% 21 2.63% 12 1.50% 2 0.25% 744 93.00% 800 Clarke 1,397 97.42% 25 1.74% 12 0.84% 0 0.00% 1,372 95.68% 1,434 Clay 1,196 63.72% 677 36.07% 1 0.05% 3 0.16% 519 27.65% 1,877 Cleburne 760 56.21% 578 42.75% 5 0.37% 9 0.67% 182 13.46% 1,352 Coffee 2,029 81.95% 426 17.21% 17 0.69% 4 0.16% 1,603 64.74% 2,476 Colbert 1,132 74.04% 352 23.02% 44 2.88% 1 0.07% 780 51.01% 1,529 Conecuh 1,036 94.44% 42 3.83% 17 1.55% 2 0.18% 994 90.61% 1,097 Coosa 867 62.42% 485 34.92% 34 2.45% 3 0.22% 382 27.50% 1,389 Covington 1,738 79.94% 305 14.03% 107 4.92% 24 1.10% 1,433 65.92% 2,174 Crenshaw 1,427 90.43% 139 8.81% 5 0.32% 7 0.44% 1,288 81.62% 1,578 Cullman 1,396 50.52% 1,351 48.90% 9 0.33% 7 0.25% 45 1.63% 2,763 Dale 1,260 67.38% 597 31.93% 4 0.21% 9 0.48% 663 35.45% 1,870 Dallas 1,565 97.87% 23 1.44% 7 0.44% 4 0.25% 1,542 96.44% 1,599 DeKalb 1,787 59.09% 1,190 39.35% 33 1.09% 14 0.46% 597 19.74% 3,024 Elmore 1,631 99.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 0.43% 1,624"HanlydHughes" In this county where Hanly ran second ahead of Hughes, margin given is Wilson vote minus Hanly vote and percentage margin Wilson percentage minus Hanly percentage. 99.15% 1,638 Escambia 982 89.84% 108 9.88% 3 0.27% 0 0.00% 874 79.96% 1,093 Etowah 1,883 66.65% 862 30.51% 73 2.58% 7 0.25% 1,021 36.14% 2,825 Fayette 1,026 58.43% 697 39.69% 18 1.03% 15 0.85% 329 18.74% 1,756 Franklin 1,044 50.34% 984 47.44% 39 1.88% 7 0.34% 60 2.89% 2,074 Geneva 1,265 62.84% 713 35.42% 23 1.14% 12 0.60% 552 27.42% 2,013 Greene 383 97.70% 9 2.30% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 374 95.41% 392 Hale 795 97.79% 15 1.85% 1 0.12% 2 0.25% 780 95.94% 813 Henry 860 83.25% 141 13.65% 27 2.61% 5 0.48% 719 69.60% 1,033 Houston 1,670 76.05% 466 21.22% 46 2.09% 14 0.64% 1,204 54.83% 2,196 Jackson 1,907 75.61% 567 22.48% 32 1.27% 16 0.63% 1,340 53.13% 2,522 Jefferson 10,677 81.38% 2,052 15.64% 296 2.26% 95 0.72% 8,625 65.74% 13,120 Lamar 1,299 79.45% 303 18.53% 4 0.24% 29 1.77% 996 60.92% 1,635 Lauderdale 1,678 79.64% 369 17.51% 47 2.23% 13 0.62% 1,309 62.13% 2,107 Lawrence 995 85.92% 43 3.71% 4 0.35% 116 10.02% 879"HanlydHughes" 75.91% 1,158 Lee 1,369 94.67% 42 2.90% 30 2.07% 5 0.35% 1,327 91.77% 1,446 Limestone 1,450 92.12% 92 5.84% 19 1.21% 13 0.83% 1,358 86.28% 1,574 Lowndes 540 98.00% 9 1.63% 1 0.18% 1 0.18% 531 96.37% 551 Macon 575 92.59% 43 6.92% 2 0.32% 1 0.16% 532 85.67% 621 Madison 2,206 89.17% 215 8.69% 45 1.82% 8 0.32% 1,991 80.48% 2,474 Marengo 1,491 98.61% 19 1.26% 1 0.07% 1 0.07% 1,472 97.35% 1,512 Marion 1,325 61.89% 807 37.69% 1 0.05% 8 0.37% 518 24.19% 2,141 Marshall 1,944 61.32% 1,183 37.32% 33 1.04% 10 0.32% 761 24.01% 3,170 Mobile 2,968 76.18% 832 21.36% 75 1.93% 21 0.54% 2,136 54.83% 3,896 Monroe 1,029 98.09% 17 1.62% 2 0.19% 1 0.10% 1,012 96.47% 1,049 Montgomery 3,316 96.06% 106 3.07% 19 0.55% 11 0.32% 3,210 92.99% 3,452 Morgan 2,120 82.62% 364 14.19% 44 1.71% 38 1.48% 1,756 68.43% 2,566 Perry 895 96.44% 20 2.16% 12 1.29% 1 0.11% 875 94.29% 928 Pickens 1,179 83.09% 218 15.36% 18 1.27% 4 0.28% 961 67.72% 1,419 Pike 1,789 96.39% 50 2.69% 11 0.59% 6 0.32% 1,739 93.70% 1,856 Randolph 1,324 66.70% 652 32.85% 4 0.20% 5 0.25% 672 33.85% 1,985 Russell 752 99.08% 3 0.40% 4 0.53% 0 0.00% 748"BensondHughes" In this county where Benson ran second ahead of Hughes, margin given is Wilson vote minus Benson vote and percentage margin Wilson percentage minus Benson percentage. 98.55% 759 St. Clair 987 51.97% 851 44.81% 53 2.79% 8 0.42% 136 7.16% 1,899 Shelby 1,311 47.57% 1,428 51.81% 8 0.29% 9 0.33% -117 -4.25% 2,756 Sumter 770 98.21% 8 1.02% 6 0.77% 0 0.00% 762 97.19% 784 Talladega 1,539 77.10% 447 22.39% 4 0.20% 6 0.30% 1,092 54.71% 1,996 Tallapoosa 1,892 91.98% 129 6.27% 33 1.60% 3 0.15% 1,763 85.71% 2,057 Tuscaloosa 2,437 89.99% 218 8.05% 41 1.51% 12 0.44% 2,219 81.94% 2,708 Walker 2,314 53.80% 1,860 43.25% 107 2.49% 20 0.47% 454 10.56% 4,301 Washington 500 92.94% 32 5.95% 2 0.37% 4 0.74% 468 86.99% 538 Wilcox 866 99.88% 1 0.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 865 99.77% 867 Winston 727 39.36% 1,107 59.94% 6 0.32% 7 0.38% -380 -20.57% 1,847Totals99,40976.04%28,66221.92%1,9161.47%7410.57%70,74754.12%130,728 See also United States presidential elections in Alabama Notes References expanded Alabama 1916 Category:1916 Alabama elections