Skip to main content

  | मौसम…

411 समाचार
Public archive edition · Attributed source reporting with original dates · AI drafts are excluded

411 REFERENCE · Wikipedia

1856 Argentina–Chile treaty

Reference material by Wikipedia contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.

1856 treaty between Chile and Argentina left|300px|thumb|Map of the East Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego and Strait of Magellan Dispute. In blue and green are the boundaries claimed by ArgentinianDalmacio Vélez Sarsfield Discusión de los títulos del Gobierno de Chile a las tierras del Estrecho de Magallanes 1853 Imprenta Argentina and ChileanEyzaguirre, Jaime Breve historia de las fronteras de Chile 1967 Editorial UniversitariaLagos Carmona Guillermo Los Títulos Históricos: Historia de Las Fronteras de Chile 1985 Andrés Bello (p. 197) We note that the Loa river is at 22 degrees and that Baleato, in 1793, indicated 21.5 degrees for the beginning of the Kingdom of Chile, with the Loa at its mouth in the Pacific. (...) (p. 540) According to the Map of Cano y Olmedilla, the limit of the Kingdom of Chile "(...) through the desert of Atacama (...) From here it turns to the S., S.E., S.E., and S., keeping in general this last course until near the 29° parallel, from where it takes a S.E. direction. SE. and S., generally keeping this last course until the vicinity of the 29° parallel, from where it takes a S.E. direction, skirting to the east the 'Province of Cuyo' which, of course, appears to be included in the territory of the Kingdom of Chile. In the latitude of 32°30' the line turns to the S.W. until reaching the Quinto river, which, as the legend says 'communicates by channels with the Saladillo in time of floods'. It follows the river down to the meridian 316°, counting to the E. of Tenerife, where it turns a stretch until it reaches the Hueuque-Leuvu river (or Barrancas river) at 371/2° latitude. From here it runs along the river for a stretch to the S.E., and then turns to the E. and falls into the Atlantic Sea in the vicinity of parallel 37° between Cape Lobos and Cape Corrientes", "a little north of the current Mar del Plata". (...) (p. 543) In this document it is seen that those of the province of Cuyo end to the south at the source of the Diamante River, and that from that point to the east, the dividing line goes to the point where the Quinto River crosses the road that goes from Santiago to Buenos Aires.Amunátegui Miguel Luis Títulos de la República de Chile a la soberanía i dominio de la Estremidad 1985 https://libros.uchile.cl/files/presses/1/monographs/128/submission/proof/36/Morla Vicuña Carlos Estudio histórico sobre el descubrimiento y conquista de la Patagonia y de la Tierra del Fuego F. A. Brockhaus Leipzig 1903 historians respectably as uti possidetis iuris in Patagonia. The Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Commerce and Navigation of 1856 between Chile and Argentina (es Tratado de paz, amistad, comercio y navegación entre la República de Chile y la Confederación Argentina) was the first boundary treatyAugust 2019 between Argentina and Chile. Article 39 of the treaty proposed the use of direct diplomatic negotiations and arbitration to resolve disputes.Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Argentine Confederation and the Republic of Chile (translated) https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hj12na&view=1up&seq=1238 HathiTrust Digital Library London:HMSO, issued by the Foreign Office 10 August 2019 1200–1213 30 August 1855 British and foreign state papers. v. 49, pp.1200-1213 ... Ratifications exchanged at Santiago, April 29, 1856. It established that the boundaries should be based on the uti possidetis principle based on what each country possessed before the Chilean and Argentine wars of independence beginning in 1810. It also postponed the solution of the East Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego and Strait of Magellan Dispute into the future. Article 40 of this treaty established a 12-year limit on the effect of its articles about commerce and navigation. The Boundary treaty of 1881 between Chile and Argentina mentions this treaty to say that the later treaty is "in fulfillment" of Section 39 of this treaty.Treaty between the Argentine Republic and Chile, defining the Boundaries between the two Countries (translated) https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.35112103946085&view=1up&seq=1135 HathiTrust Digital Library London:HMSO, issued by the Foreign Office 10 August 2019 1103–1105 23 July 1881 British and foreign state papers. v. 72 1880/1881, pp.1103-1105 Background East Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego and Strait of Magellan Dispute#Chilean incorporation of Southern Patagonia during the 19th century thumb|250px|Chile founded Fort Bulnes on the coast of the Brunswick Peninsula in 1843 to take possession of the Strait of Magellan and the surrounding territory, prompting diplomatic protests from Argentina. The government of President Manuel Bulnes dispatched the schooner Ancud to take possession of the Strait of Magellan on behalf of Chile. The intendant of Chiloé, Domingo Espiñeira, organized and directed the operations, which were carried out by Frigate Captain John Williams Wilson. On September 21, 1843, he completed the takeover of the Strait of Magellan at the historic site of Puerto del Hambre, founding Fort Bulnes.Anrique, Nicolás, *Diario de la goleta “Ancud” al mando del capitán de fragata don Juan Guillermos (1843) para tomar posesión del estrecho de Magallanes*, Santiago, Chile, Imprenta Barcelona, 1901, p. 86. Between 1852 and 1855, both countries engaged in a highly detailed historical and geographical debate, amassing a significant collection of documents to support their respective claims.Mario Barros Van Buren OUR RELATIONS WITH ARGENTINA https://revistamarina.cl/revistas/1998/1/mbarrosvb.pdf Revista Marina 1998 April 23, 2024 The Argentine government claimed all the territory south of the Diamante River, including the Strait and Tierra del Fuego. The Chilean minister Antonio Varas, upon learning of the historical studies published by Miguel Luis Amunátegui in 1853, regarded them as a revelation. Although these studies claimed the uti possidetis iuris boundary to be the same as shown in the map by Juan de la Cruz Cano y Olmedilla of 1775 (excluding the Cuyo region, which had been transferred to the jurisdiction of Buenos Aires by the King of Spain in 1776), the Chilean government sought to assert sovereignty up to the Río Negro.Mateo Martinic Beros Chile's Presence in Southern Patagonia 1843 - 1879 1971 Editorial Andrés Bello https://www.memoriachilena.gob.cl/602/w3-article-10386.html December 8, 2022 Upon learning of Amunátegui’s book, the Argentine government tasked Dalmacio Vélez Sarsfield in 1855 with drafting a response, which was subsequently countered by Amunátegui. The following year, amidst these academic disputes tied to the governments of both countries, the treaty was signed. Sources Tratado de paz, amistad, comercio y navegación entre la República de Chile y la Confederación Argentina Wikisource See also Potreros of the Andes dispute 1826 Chile–United Provinces of the Río de la Plata treaty East Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego and Strait of Magellan dispute References Category:Argentina–Chile treaties Argentina-Chile Treaty, 1856 Argentina-Chile Treaty, 1856 Argentina-Chile Treaty, 1856