1932 United States presidential election in Texas

none June 2025 September 2023 1932 United States presidential election 1932 United States presidential election in Texas Texas 1923 presidential no 1928 United States presidential election in Texas 1928 1936 United States presidential election in Texas 1936 November 8, 1932 x200px FDR in 1933 (3x4).jpg Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic Party (United States) New York John Nance Garner 23 760,348 88.06% President Hoover portrait (cropped).jpg Herbert Hoover Republican Party (United States) California Charles Curtis 0 97,959 11.35% 350px 350px County results Roosevelt #4389e3 60–70% #1666cb 70–80% #0645b4 80–90% #002b84 90–100% President Herbert Hoover Republican Party (United States) Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic Party (United States) The 1932 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the 1932 United States presidential election, which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose 23 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president. Texas voted for the Democratic nominee, Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York, over the Republican nominee, incumbent President Herbert Hoover of California. Roosevelt ran with Speaker of the House John Nance Garner, a Texas native while Hoover ran with incumbent Vice President Charles Curtis of Kansas. Roosevelt defeated Hoover in Texas by a landslide margin of 76.71%. In this era, Texas was a one-party Solid South state dominated by the Democratic Party, but Roosevelt's performance was overwhelming even relative to the many prior Democratic landslides, and remains the largest blowout victory by any presidential nominee in the state. Furthermore, Roosevelt carried every single county with more than 65% of the vote. This election constitutes the only time in history that a presidential candidate has swept all 254 counties in the state.In 1852, before the founding of the Republican Party and before much of the state had been incorporated, Franklin Pierce also swept all counties at the time. With 88.06%, Texas would prove to be Roosevelt's fifth strongest state in popular vote percentage after South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia.https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/stats.php?year=1932&f=0&off=0&elect=0 1932 Presidential Election Statistics Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections 2018-03-05 To date, this is the last election in which Kendall County voted for a Democratic presidential candidate; in fact, despite Roosevelt carrying the county with over 73% of the vote, no Democrat since has reached even 45%.Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016 Results 1932 United States presidential election in Texashttps://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1932&fips=48&f=0&off=0&elect=0&minper=0 1932 Presidential General Election Results – Texas 2013-02-07 Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential ElectionsPartyCandidateVotesPercentageElectoral votes Democratic Franklin D. Roosevelt 760,348 88.06% 23 Republican Herbert Hoover (incumbent) 97,959 11.35% 0 Socialist Norman Thomas 4,450"PollsvLeip" There are significant differences between totals for minor parties given in Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas, America at the Polls and Géoelections. 0.52% 0 Liberty William Hope Harvey 324"PollsvLeip" 0.04% 0 Communist William Z. Foster 207"PollsvLeip" 0.02% 0 Jacksonian Democrat No candidate 104"PollsvLeip" 0.01% 0 Write-ins Write-ins 34 0.00% 0 Totals 863,426 100.00% 23 Results by county +1932 United States presidential election in Texas by countyScammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920–1964; pp. 431–435 0405077114Géoelections http://geoelections.free.fr/USA/elec_comtes/1932.htm 1932 Presidential Election Popular Vote (.xlsx file for €15 on request with full Thomas and Harvey data)County Franklin D. RooseveltDemocratic Herbert HooverRepublicanNorman ThomasSocialist William Hope HarveyLibertyWilliam Z. FosterCommunist Margin Totalvotescast # % # % # % # % # % # % Anderson 4,354 94.10% 259 5.60%140.30% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,095 88.50% 4,627 Andrews 186 96.37% 6 3.11%00.00% 1 0.52% 0 0.00% 180 93.26% 193 Angelina 4,962 94.46% 287 5.46%40.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,675 89.00% 5,253 Aransas 268 87.01% 39 12.66%10.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 229 74.35% 308 Archer 1,555 94.01% 97 5.86%20.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,458 88.15% 1,654 Armstrong 813 92.70% 63 7.18%10.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 750 85.52% 877 Atascosa 2,101 91.07% 192 8.32%140.61% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,909 82.75% 2,307 Austin 2,806 94.96% 142 4.81%70.24% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,664 90.15% 2,955 Bailey 851 88.83% 104 10.86%30.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 747 77.97% 958 Bandera 883 70.70% 359 28.74%60.48% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 524 41.95% 1,249 Bastrop 3,077 94.42% 180 5.52%10.03% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 2,897 88.89% 3,259 Baylor 1,437 96.25% 55 3.68%10.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,382 92.57% 1,493 Bee 2,180 80.03% 534 19.60%80.29% 0 0.00% 2 0.07% 1,646 60.43% 2,724 Bell 7,607 91.06% 724 8.67%230.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6,883 82.39% 8,354 Bexar 37,765 82.83% 7,466 16.37%3320.73% 18 0.04% 13 0.03% 30,299 66.45% 45,594 Blanco 1,233 90.20% 127 9.29%70.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,106 80.91% 1,367 Borden 242 97.19% 7 2.81%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 235 94.38% 249 Bosque 3,214 92.12% 272 7.80%30.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,942 84.32% 3,489 Bowie 5,269 90.39% 541 9.28%190.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,728 81.11% 5,829 Brazoria 2,948 82.44% 617 17.25%110.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,331 65.18% 3,576 Brazos 2,588 92.40% 195 6.96%180.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,393 85.43% 2,801 Brewster 875 86.63% 130 12.87%30.30% 2 0.20% 0 0.00% 745 73.76% 1,010 Briscoe 977 95.50% 42 4.11%20.20% 2 0.20% 0 0.00% 935 91.40% 1,023 Brooks 608 87.23% 86 12.34%30.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 522 74.89% 697 Brown 4,024 91.98% 330 7.54%190.43% 1 0.02% 1 0.02% 3,694 84.43% 4,375 Burleson 2,423 95.21% 119 4.68%20.08% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2,304 90.53% 2,545 Burnet 1,904 92.88% 144 7.02%00.00% 1 0.05% 1 0.05% 1,760 85.85% 2,050 Caldwell 3,317 91.88% 291 8.06%20.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,026 83.82% 3,610 Calhoun 834 88.35% 100 10.59%101.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 734 77.75% 944 Callahan 2,133 93.23% 152 6.64%30.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,981 86.58% 2,288 Cameron 7,146 79.53% 1,785 19.87%510.57% 2 0.02% 1 0.01% 5,361 59.67% 8,985 Camp 1,416 94.97% 73 4.90%20.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,343 90.07% 1,491 Carson 1,391 86.67% 212 13.21%20.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,179 73.46% 1,605 Cass 3,135 93.33% 224 6.67%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,911 86.66% 3,359 Castro 949 92.77% 66 6.45%80.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 883 86.31% 1,023 Chambers 843 89.78% 91 9.69%50.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 752 80.09% 939 Cherokee 4,125 94.44% 233 5.33%90.21% 1 0.02% 0 0.00% 3,892 89.10% 4,368 Childress 2,072 92.58% 153 6.84%130.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,919 85.75% 2,238 Clay 2,365 93.74% 151 5.98%70.28% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,214 87.75% 2,523 Cochran 345 88.92% 31 7.99%123.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 314 80.93% 388 Coke 983 93.89% 57 5.44%60.57% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 926 88.44% 1,047 Coleman 2,881 92.10% 235 7.51%120.38% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,646 84.59% 3,128 Collin 6,059 90.46% 589 8.79%500.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5,470 81.67% 6,698 Collingsworth 1,753 93.29% 115 6.12%80.43% 2 0.11% 1 0.05% 1,638 87.17% 1,879 Colorado 2,715 88.47% 331 10.79%220.72% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,384 77.68% 3,069 Comal 2,211 92.05% 176 7.33%130.54% 1 0.04% 1 0.04% 2,035 84.72% 2,402 Comanche 3,134 93.86% 192 5.75%130.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,942 88.11% 3,339 Concho 1,126 95.91% 44 3.75%40.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,082 92.16% 1,174 Cooke 3,775 88.51% 470 11.02%200.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,305 77.49% 4,265 Coryell 3,347 94.52% 191 5.39%30.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,156 89.13% 3,541 Cottle 1,196 96.92% 38 3.08%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,158 93.84% 1,234 Crane 416 91.63% 37 8.15%10.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 379 83.48% 454 Crockett 329 66.20% 168 33.80%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 161 32.39% 497 Crosby 1,590 93.64% 108 6.36%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,482 87.28% 1,698 Culberson 285 93.75% 18 5.92%00.00% 1 0.33% 0 0.00% 267 87.83% 304 Dallam 1,935 84.13% 341 14.83%210.91% 2 0.09% 1 0.04% 1,594 69.30% 2,300 Dallas 37,363 80.09% 8,919 19.12%3540.76% 9 0.02% 8 0.02% 28,444 60.97% 46,653 Dawson 1,659 91.51% 153 8.44%10.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,506 83.07% 1,813 Deaf Smith 1,307 86.84% 198 13.16%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,109 73.69% 1,505 Delta 2,013 95.81% 87 4.14%10.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,926 91.67% 2,101 Denton 5,115 90.10% 520 9.16%390.69% 3 0.05% 0 0.00% 4,595 80.94% 5,677 De Witt 3,206 91.05% 309 8.78%40.11% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 2,897 82.28% 3,521 Dickens 1,491 95.45% 63 4.03%70.45% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,428 91.42% 1,562 Dimmit 843 77.34% 241 22.11%50.46% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 602 55.23% 1,090 Donley 1,626 91.71% 141 7.95%50.28% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,485 83.76% 1,773 Duval 1,566 98.12% 30 1.88%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,536 96.24% 1,596 Eastland 4,958 89.24% 598 10.76%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,360 78.47% 5,556 Ector 530 89.08% 37 6.22%10.17% 19 3.19% 8 1.34% 493 82.86% 595 Edwards 575 71.52% 224 27.86%40.50% 1 0.12% 0 0.00% 351 43.66% 804 Ellis 7,033 92.49% 527 6.93%390.51% 0 0.00% 5 0.07% 6,506 85.56% 7,604 El Paso 11,336 78.77% 2,841 19.74%2141.49% 1 0.01% 0 0.00% 8,495 59.03% 14,392 Erath 3,319 91.46% 284 7.83%200.55% 5 0.14% 1 0.03% 3,035 83.63% 3,629 Falls 3,896 95.40% 181 4.43%70.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,715 90.96% 4,084 Fannin 5,338 91.80% 460 7.91%160.28% 0 0.00% 1 0.02% 4,878 83.89% 5,815 Fayette 4,985 95.26% 245 4.68%30.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,740 90.58% 5,233 Fisher 1,395 92.63% 105 6.97%60.40% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,290 85.66% 1,506 Floyd 1,976 92.94% 145 6.82%40.19% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,831 86.12% 2,126 Foard 882 93.04% 53 5.59%131.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 829 87.45% 948 Fort Bend 3,109 95.22% 148 4.53%80.25% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,961 90.69% 3,265 Franklin 1,305 95.81% 56 4.11%00.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.07% 1,249 91.70% 1,362 Freestone 2,481 93.41% 170 6.40%50.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,311 87.01% 2,656 Frio 998 87.54% 142 12.46%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 856 75.09% 1,140 Gaines 510 90.75% 44 7.83%81.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 466 82.92% 562 Galveston 10,491 83.38% 2,011 15.98%710.56% 4 0.03% 5 0.04% 8,480 67.40% 12,582 Garza 812 89.82% 87 9.62%50.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 725 80.20% 904 Gillespie 2,642 79.65% 662 19.96%120.36% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 1,980 59.69% 3,317 Glasscock 212 83.46% 42 16.54%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 170 66.93% 254 Goliad 1,542 89.76% 170 9.90%10.06% 4 0.23% 1 0.06% 1,372 79.86% 1,718 Gonzales 3,384 90.77% 337 9.04%50.13% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 3,047 81.73% 3,728 Gray 3,446 86.69% 505 12.70%220.55% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% 2,941 73.99% 3,975 Grayson 9,631 87.62% 1,317 11.98%420.38% 2 0.02% 0 0.00% 8,314 75.64% 10,992 Gregg 5,204 93.38% 341 6.12%200.36% 0 0.00% 8 0.14% 4,863 87.26% 5,573 Grimes 2,065 92.89% 153 6.88%40.18% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 1,912 86.01% 2,223 Guadalupe 3,751 84.27% 691 15.52%90.20% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,060 68.75% 4,451 Hale 3,029 88.13% 369 10.74%391.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,660 77.39% 3,437 Hall 2,114 95.31% 91 4.10%130.59% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,023 91.21% 2,218 Hamilton 2,474 93.64% 164 6.21%20.08% 1 0.04% 1 0.04% 2,310 87.43% 2,642 Hansford 803 89.12% 67 7.44%303.33% 1 0.11% 0 0.00% 736 81.69% 901 Hardeman 1,985 92.97% 145 6.79%50.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,840 86.18% 2,135 Hardin 2,783 94.53% 161 5.47%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,622 89.06% 2,944 Harris 46,886 83.77% 8,604 15.37%4260.76% 9 0.02% 45 0.08% 38,282 68.40% 55,970 Harrison 4,057 88.12% 528 11.47%190.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,529 76.65% 4,604 Hartley 586 88.79% 74 11.21%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 512 77.58% 660 Haskell 2,330 93.20% 154 6.16%160.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,176 87.04% 2,500 Hays 1,822 88.88% 220 10.73%70.34% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,602 78.15% 2,050 Hemphill 918 87.26% 133 12.64%10.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 785 74.62% 1,052 Henderson 3,522 93.67% 219 5.82%190.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,303 87.85% 3,760 Hidalgo 9,695 75.84% 2,969 23.22%1000.78% 14 0.11% 6 0.05% 6,726 52.61% 12,784 Hill 5,297 93.55% 360 6.36%40.07% 1 0.02% 0 0.00% 4,937 87.20% 5,662 Hockley 1,513 93.22% 76 4.68%342.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,437 88.54% 1,623 Hood 1,119 90.98% 106 8.62%50.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,013 82.36% 1,230 Hopkins 4,891 94.81% 261 5.06%70.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,630 89.75% 5,159 Houston 3,087 94.84% 165 5.07%30.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,922 89.77% 3,255 Howard 2,733 94.40% 149 5.15%130.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,584 89.26% 2,895 Hudspeth 341 91.42% 31 8.31%00.00% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 310 83.11% 373 Hunt 6,856 93.41% 465 6.34%130.18% 0 0.00% 6 0.08% 6,391 87.07% 7,340 Hutchinson 1,976 78.79% 505 20.14%261.04% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 1,471 58.65% 2,508 Irion 398 87.28% 47 10.31%112.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 351 76.97% 456 Jack 1,429 87.45% 189 11.57%140.86% 0 0.00% 2 0.12% 1,240 75.89% 1,634 Jackson 1,030 84.84% 182 14.99%20.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 848 69.85% 1,214 Jasper 1,990 95.49% 93 4.46%10.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,897 91.03% 2,084 Jeff Davis 252 83.44% 46 15.23%41.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 206 68.21% 302 Jefferson 17,129 82.09% 3,584 17.18%1450.69% 1 0.00% 6 0.03% 13,545 64.92% 20,865 Jim Hogg 428 89.35% 51 10.65%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 377 78.71% 479 Jim Wells 1,449 89.39% 162 9.99%80.49% 0 0.00% 2 0.12% 1,287 79.40% 1,621 Johnson 4,858 89.88% 530 9.81%170.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,328 80.07% 5,405 Jones 2,934 92.03% 224 7.03%140.44% 12 0.38% 4 0.13% 2,710 85.01% 3,188 Karnes 2,458 92.75% 186 7.02%40.15% 2 0.08% 0 0.00% 2,272 85.74% 2,650 Kaufman 4,116 93.78% 268 6.11%50.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,848 87.67% 4,389 Kendall 1,185 73.65% 416 25.85%50.31% 2 0.12% 1 0.06% 769 47.79% 1,609 Kenedy 123 95.35% 5 3.88%00.00% 1 0.78% 0 0.00% 118 91.47% 129 Kent 561 95.57% 23 3.92%30.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 538 91.65% 587 Kerr 2,165 77.21% 623 22.22%150.53% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 1,542 54.99% 2,804 Kimble 890 87.77% 121 11.93%30.30% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 769 75.84% 1,014 King 224 98.25% 4 1.75%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 220 96.49% 228 Kinney 678 88.28% 89 11.59%00.00% 1 0.13% 0 0.00% 589 76.69% 768 Kleberg 1,727 88.56% 198 10.15%231.18% 2 0.10% 0 0.00% 1,529 78.41% 1,950 Knox 1,600 93.79% 102 5.98%40.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,498 87.81% 1,706 Lamar 5,911 93.72% 375 5.95%160.25% 5 0.08% 0 0.00% 5,536 87.78% 6,307 Lamb 2,978 90.57% 271 8.24%391.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,707 82.33% 3,288 Lampasas 1,824 93.83% 120 6.17%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,704 87.65% 1,944 La Salle 810 89.50% 92 10.17%30.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 718 79.34% 905 Lavaca 4,378 94.91% 224 4.86%90.20% 2 0.04% 0 0.00% 4,154 90.05% 4,613 Lee 1,831 94.33% 110 5.67%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,721 88.67% 1,941 Leon 1,958 94.32% 108 5.20%90.43% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1,850 89.11% 2,076 Liberty 2,527 90.38% 247 8.83%180.64% 0 0.00% 4 0.14% 2,280 81.55% 2,796 Limestone 4,416 95.28% 215 4.64%30.06% 1 0.02% 0 0.00% 4,201 90.64% 4,635 Lipscomb 865 68.06% 349 27.46%191.49% 0 0.00% 38 2.99% 516 40.60% 1,271 Live Oak 1,070 89.77% 114 9.56%70.59% 0 0.00% 1 0.08% 956 80.20% 1,192 Llano 1,229 91.92% 108 8.08%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,121 83.84% 1,337 Loving 187 86.98% 27 12.56%10.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 160 74.42% 215 Lubbock 5,330 89.53% 590 9.91%290.49% 1 0.02% 3 0.05% 4,740 79.62% 5,953 Lynn 1,930 94.24% 110 5.37%80.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,820 88.87% 2,048 McCulloch 2,006 88.10% 265 11.64%60.26% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,741 76.46% 2,277 McLennan 11,972 90.80% 1,108 8.40%1000.76% 1 0.01% 4 0.03% 10,864 82.40% 13,185 McMullen 258 95.56% 12 4.44%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 246 91.11% 270 Madison 1,344 98.53% 20 1.47%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,324 97.07% 1,364 Marion 861 90.54% 84 8.83%60.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 777 81.70% 951 Martin 694 93.28% 44 5.91%20.27% 4 0.54% 0 0.00% 650 87.37% 744 Mason 828 72.57% 309 27.08%40.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 519 45.49% 1,141 Matagorda 2,039 82.85% 408 16.58%140.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,631 66.27% 2,461 Maverick 847 80.21% 199 18.84%100.95% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 648 61.36% 1,056 Medina 2,516 82.87% 515 16.96%30.10% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 2,001 65.91% 3,036 Menard 901 85.57% 150 14.25%20.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 751 71.32% 1,053 Midland 1,245 88.80% 136 9.70%40.29% 15 1.07% 2 0.14% 1,109 79.10% 1,402 Milam 4,676 94.22% 264 5.32%0.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,412 88.90% 4,963 Mills 1,434 91.51% 133 8.49%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,301 83.02% 1,567 Mitchell 1,490 90.85% 148 9.02%20.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,342 81.83% 1,640 Montague 3,090 91.39% 262 7.75%0.77% 3 0.09% 0 0.00% 2,828 83.64% 3,381 Montgomery 1,971 93.90% 126 6.00%20.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,845 87.90% 2,099 Moore 549 90.44% 56 9.23%20.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 493 81.22% 607 Morris 1,253 97.06% 38 2.94%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,215 94.11% 1,291 Motley 900 96.15% 34 3.63%10.11% 1 0.11% 0 0.00% 866 92.52% 936 Nacogdoches 3,603 96.70% 117 3.14%60.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,486 93.56% 3,726 Navarro 6,392 92.44% 512 7.40%110.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5,880 85.03% 6,915 Newton 1,586 97.00% 46 2.81%20.12% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,540 94.19% 1,635 Nolan 2,453 91.70% 219 8.19%20.07% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 2,234 83.51% 2,675 Nueces 6,659 86.91% 967 12.62%350.46% 1 0.01% 0 0.00% 5,692 74.29% 7,662 Ochiltree 1,097 84.97% 183 14.18%110.85% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 914 70.80% 1,291 Oldham 432 87.63% 61 12.37%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 371 75.25% 493 Orange 2,830 91.94% 244 7.93%40.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,586 84.02% 3,078 Palo Pinto 2,722 87.02% 392 12.53%140.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,330 74.49% 3,128 Panola 2,630 97.08% 50 1.85%291.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,580 95.24% 2,709 Parker 3,074 88.28% 372 10.68%361.03% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,702 77.60% 3,482 Parmer 1,154 87.49% 148 11.22%161.21% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 1,006 76.27% 1,319 Pecos 1,261 87.09% 180 12.43%70.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,081 74.65% 1,448 Polk 2,117 94.98% 110 4.93%20.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,007 90.04% 2,229 Potter 6,366 83.29% 1,233 16.13%400.52% 3 0.04% 1 0.01% 5,133 67.16% 7,643 Presidio 863 88.33% 112 11.46%10.10% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 751 76.87% 977 Rains 937 95.13% 41 4.16%70.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 896 90.96% 985 Randall 1,394 85.10% 231 14.10%100.61% 2 0.12% 1 0.06% 1,163 71.00% 1,638 Reagan 681 84.28% 124 15.35%30.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 557 68.94% 808 Real 335 79.01% 89 20.99%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 246 58.02% 424 Red River 3,181 95.44% 145 4.35%70.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,036 91.09% 3,333 Reeves 1,085 89.60% 122 10.07%40.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 963 79.52% 1,211 Refugio 1,201 86.15% 172 12.34%30.22% 18 1.29% 0 0.00% 1,029 73.82% 1,394 Roberts 451 91.85% 36 7.33%30.61% 1 0.20% 0 0.00% 415 84.52% 491 Robertson 2,396 94.18% 148 5.82%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,248 88.36% 2,544 Rockwall 1,237 95.23% 62 4.77%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,175 90.45% 1,299 Runnels 2,975 92.39% 235 7.30%100.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,740 85.09% 3,220 Rusk 5,074 91.16% 483 8.68%90.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,591 82.48% 5,566 Sabine 1,789 96.76% 57 3.08%30.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,732 93.67% 1,849 San Augustine 1,802 98.96% 19 1.04%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,783 97.91% 1,821 San Jacinto 828 97.64% 16 1.89%40.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 812 95.75% 848 San Patricio 2,142 83.48% 407 15.86%130.51% 4 0.16% 0 0.00% 1,735 67.61% 2,566 San Saba 1,904 93.89% 122 6.02%20.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,782 87.87% 2,028 Schleicher 516 87.16% 76 12.84%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 440 74.32% 592 Scurry 1,604 93.75% 105 6.14%20.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,499 87.61% 1,711 Shackelford 1,316 91.52% 117 8.14%30.21% 1 0.07% 1 0.07% 1,199 83.38% 1,438 Shelby 3,594 96.25% 120 3.21%200.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3,474 93.04% 3,734 Sherman 515 84.56% 91 14.94%30.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 424 69.62% 609 Smith 7,424 90.53% 750 9.15%250.30% 0 0.00% 2 0.02% 6,674 81.38% 8,201 Somervell 561 89.90% 43 6.89%203.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 518 83.01% 624 Starr 754 95.93% 32 4.07%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 722 91.86% 786 Stephens 2,684 90.40% 256 8.62%230.77% 1 0.03% 5 0.17% 2,428 81.78% 2,969 Sterling 354 96.46% 13 3.54%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 341 92.92% 367 Stonewall 976 95.13% 50 4.87%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 926 90.25% 1,026 Sutton 372 76.70% 113 23.30%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 259 53.40% 485 Swisher 1,448 88.78% 166 10.18%160.98% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,282 78.60% 1,631 Tarrant 27,836 83.06% 5,251 15.67%4231.26% 0 0.00% 3 0.01% 22,585 67.39% 33,513 Taylor 5,235 88.95% 639 10.86%100.17% 0 0.00% 1 0.02% 4,596 78.10% 5,885 Terrell 479 78.14% 133 21.70%10.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 346 56.44% 613 Terry 1,448 93.84% 87 5.64%70.45% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,361 88.20% 1,543 Throckmorton 932 90.57% 95 9.23%20.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 837 81.34% 1,029 Titus 2,523 96.96% 75 2.88%30.12% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2,448 94.08% 2,602 Tom Green 4,957 86.75% 739 12.93%160.28% 0 0.00% 2 0.04% 4,218 73.82% 5,714 Travis 11,718 87.60% 1,532 11.45%1230.92% 1 0.01% 2 0.01% 10,186 76.15% 13,376 Trinity 1,514 95.70% 65 4.11%30.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,449 91.59% 1,582 Tyler 1,450 96.99% 44 2.94%10.07% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,406 94.05% 1,495 Upshur 2,900 95.39% 129 4.24%0.23% 4 0.13% 0 0.00% 2,771 91.15% 3,040 Upton 1,012 91.17% 92 8.29%50.45% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 920 82.88% 1,110 Uvalde 1,759 80.47% 422 19.30%40.18% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1,337 61.16% 2,186 Val Verde 1,412 76.86% 421 22.92%20.11% 0 0.00% 2 0.11% 991 53.95% 1,837 Van Zandt 4,203 94.92% 190 4.29%350.79% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4,013 90.63% 4,428 Victoria 2,777 93.44% 190 6.39%0.10% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 2,587 87.05% 2,972 Walker 1,811 95.17% 83 4.36%80.42% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,728 90.80% 1,903 Waller 1,192 92.83% 89 6.93%30.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,103 85.90% 1,284 Ward 678 89.80% 70 9.27%30.40% 2 0.26% 2 0.26% 608 80.53% 755 Washington 3,443 97.12% 99 2.79%20.06% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 3,344 94.33% 3,545 Webb 4,299 86.52% 657 13.22%80.16% 5 0.10% 0 0.00% 3,642 73.29% 4,969 Wharton 3,357 88.53% 405 10.68%280.74% 0 0.00% 2 0.05% 2,952 77.85% 3,792 Wheeler 2,263 92.56% 165 6.75%160.65% 0 0.00% 1 0.04% 2,098 85.81% 2,445 Wichita 8,889 85.36% 1,479 14.20%420.40% 1 0.01% 2 0.02% 7,410 71.16% 10,413 Wilbarger 3,397 94.13% 199 5.51%120.33% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 3,198 88.61% 3,609 Willacy 1,042 80.03% 259 19.89%10.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 783 60.14% 1,302 Williamson 6,783 94.03% 418 5.79%130.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6,365 88.23% 7,214 Wilson 2,435 93.22% 174 6.66%30.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,261 86.56% 2,612 Winkler 642 88.19% 78 10.71%60.82% 2 0.27% 0 0.00% 564 77.47% 728 Wise 2,681 89.97% 286 9.60%130.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,395 80.37% 2,980 Wood 3,308 94.08% 189 5.38%180.51% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 3,119 88.71% 3,516 Yoakum 245 95.33% 11 4.28%10.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 234 91.05% 257 Young 3,156 90.64% 320 9.19%50.14% 1 0.03% 0 0.00% 2,836 81.45% 3,482 Zapata 271 91.86% 24 8.14%00.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 247 83.73% 295 Zavala 783 82.16% 166 17.42%40.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 617 64.74% 953Totals771,10988.19%98,21811.23%4,421"PollsvLeip"0.51%235"PollsvLeip"0.03%224"PollsvLeip"0.03%672,89176.95%874,398This total includes 157 “Jacksonian” and 34 write-in votes not separated by county.Scammon; America at the Polls, p. 456 Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic 10em Anderson Aransas Andrews Bandera Atascosa Bailey Bee Bell Blanco Borden Bosque Brazoria Brewster Burnet Brown Brazos Callahan Cameron Carson Chambers Childress Clay Cochran Coke Coleman Collingsworth Collin Comanche Concho Crockett Cooke Cottle Crosby Dallam Dallas Dawson Denton Deaf Smith Dickens Dimmit Donley Eastland Ector Edwards Erath Fisher Floyd Frio Gaines Garza Gillespie Glasscock Goliad Grayson Gray Hall Hale Hansford Hardeman Harris Hays Hartley Hemphill Hidalgo Hill Hockley Hood Hutchinson Hudspeth Howard Irion Jack Jackson Jeff Davis Jefferson Johnson Jones Kendall Kent Kerr King Kimble Kleberg Knox Lamar Lamb Lampasas Liberty Lipscomb Live Oak McCulloch Lynn Lubbock McLennan McMullen Martin Mason Matagorda Maverick Mills Menard Mitchell Montague Motley Nolan Ochiltree Oldham Palo Pinto Parker Parmer Potter Randall Reagan Real Roberts Runnels San Patricio Schleicher Scurry Shackelford Sherman Smith Somervell Stephens Sutton Swisher Tarrant Taylor Terrell Terry Throckmorton Tom Green Travis Val Verde Upton Uvalde Wheeler Wichita Wilbarger Wise Yoakum Zavala Young See also United States presidential elections in Texas Notes References expanded Texas 1932 Category:1932 Texas elections