1920 United States presidential election in Texas

none June 2025 January 2025 1920 United States presidential election 1920 United States presidential election in Texas Texas presidential no 1916 United States presidential election in Texas 1916 1924 United States presidential election in Texas 1924 November 2, 1920 x200px James M. Cox 1920.jpg James M. Cox Democratic Party (United States) Ohio Franklin D. Roosevelt 20 288,767 59.34% Warren G Harding-Harris & Ewing crop.jpg Warren G. Harding Republican Party (United States) Ohio Calvin Coolidge 0 114,538 23.54% Jas. E. Ferguson LCCN2014697048 (cropped).jpg James E. Ferguson American D99FE8 Texas William Hough 0 47,968 9.86% File:NOTA Option Logo 3x4.svg None FDAB66 Black-and-Tan Republican None 0 27,247 5.60% 350px 350px County results Cox #d3e7ff 30–40% #b9d7ff 40–50% #86b6f2 50–60% #4389e3 60–70% #1666cb 70–80% #0645b4 80–90% #002b84 90–100% Harding #ffccd0 30–40% #f2b3be 40–50% #e27f90 50–60% #cc2f4a 60–70% #d40000 70–80% Ferguson #c7ffaf 30–40% #c6e9af 40–50% #aade87 50–60% The 1920 presidential election in Texas was part of the 1920 United States presidential election in which all contemporary forty-eight states voted on November 2, 1920. State voters chose 20 electors, or representatives to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president. Background Ever since statehood, Texas had been very nearly the strongest state for the Democratic Party owing to its initial history being as a Deep South state with an economy based on slavery. Even during Reconstruction when African-Americans were briefly enfranchised, the Republican Party won just one statewide election, and after Redemption and the passing of a new constitution in 1876 the GOP became confined largely to areas of abolitionist German refugee settlement in the Hill Country,Bass, Jack; The Transformation of Southern Politics: Social Change and Political Consequence Since 1945, p. 25 0820317284 and to a few South Texas counties where local Republican bosses could outcompete their Democratic equivalents.Weeks, O. Douglas; 'The Texas Mexican and the Politics of South Texas'; The American Political Science Review, vol. 24, no. 3 (August 1930), pp. 606–627 The Terrell Election Law created a poll tax that, from 1902, disenfranchised virtually all remaining African-American voters, the vast majority of Mexican Americans, and most poor whites.Davidson, Chandler; Race and Class in Texas Politics, p. 21 0691025398 Voter turnout among males over twenty-one fell from over eighty percent to under thirty percent following the poll tax.Davison; Race and Class in Texas Politics, p. 24 The period following this disfranchisement nonetheless saw a considerable amount of typically "Progressive" reform under Governors James Stephen Hogg and Thomas M. Campbell, and despite this progressive faction ceding power in 1906 to the conservatives, Texas proved solid in its support for progressive candidate Woodrow Wilson at the 1912 Democratic National Convention.Grantham, Dewey W.; The Life and Death of the Solid South: A Political History, pp. 50–52 0813148723 Another populist, James Ferguson, took the governorship in 1914 on an anti-Prohibition platform, but was impeached for misappropriation of public funds. Nonetheless, this impeachment actually spurred him to run in the ensuing presidential election,Warren, Kenneth F.; Encyclopedia of U.S. Campaigns, Elections, and Electoral Behavior, p. 788 1452265879 although despite attempting to do so he did not obtain ballot access in any of the other forty-seven states. In the 1916 presidential election, Democrat Woodrow Wilson had established firmer control over the machine-dominated areas of South Texas, but hostility towards Wilson's peace promises caused some losses amongst the German population, where Lee County went Republican for the first time.Murrin, John M.; Johnson, Paul E.; McPherson, James M.; Fahs, Alice; and Gerstle Gary; Liberty, Equality, Power: A History of the American People (Concise Edition), p. 532 1285545974 By the time the 1920 presidential election season was to begin, German and Irish Americans hated President Wilson for his entry into the war and his role in drafting the Treaty of Versailles and supporting many anti-German groups during the "Red Scare".Hough, Jerry F.; Changing Party Coalitions: The Mystery of the Red State-blue State Alignment; pp. 83–86 0875864082 His League of Nations proposal was also opposed in the South where isolationism had long been very powerful.Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 211 9780691163246 Despite the hostility towards Wilson and James M. Cox, the latter of whom had banned German-language instruction in public schools as Governor of Ohio, amongst German-Americans and some isolationists, Texas was too solidly Democratic for there to be any threat from even the largest popular-vote landslide in United States presidential election history. Although Cox's performance was the worst by a Democrat since the complete disfranchisement of Texas' black population by the 1902 poll tax,Dave Leip's U.S. Election Atlas; Presidential General Election Results Comparison – Texas losses from hostility to Wilsonian foreign policy were much less pronounced than in French Louisiana or the Ozarks. American party American Party (1919) Favorite son James E. Ferguson, running on the "American" ticket but not on the ballot in a single other state, gained considerable support amongst those tenants and small-scale owners in East and Central Texas who could pay the poll tax,Bünger, Walter L.; The Path to a Modern South. Northeast Texas between Reconstruction and the Great Depression, p. 197 0292708882 but these were few enough that he did not crack double figures for the state as a whole, and his presence cut into support for imprisoned Socialist Eugene V. Debs.https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/stats.php?year=1920&f=0&off=0&elect=0 1920 Presidential Election Statistics Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections 2018-03-05 Though Ferguson was unsuccessful in the presidential election, the American Party did elect four members to the Texas House of Representatives: Walter J. Kveton of Sealy, Otto F. Menking of Fayetteville, Henry Julius Neinast of Burton, and John Henry Wessels of La Grange.Reese T. B. Gransberry C. R. Members of the House of Representatives, Thirty-Seventh Legislature 245–249 Legislative Manual of the Thirty-Seventh Legislature Texas State Legislature Austin, Texas 1921 March 26, 2024 https://lrl.texas.gov/scanned/legManuals/37th%20Legislative%20Manual.pdf Results This would be the last occasion that Zapata County would vote for a Republican presidential candidate until the 2020 election,Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, pp. 314, 319 0786422173 as it would become the last South Texas machine county to be turned over to Democratic control. 1920 United States presidential election in TexasDave Leip's U.S. Election Atlas; 1920 Presidential General Election Results – TexasPartyCandidateVotesPercentageElectoral votesDemocratic James M. Cox 288,767 59.34% 20Republican Warren G. Harding 114,538 23.54% 0American James E. Ferguson 47,968 9.86% 0Black and Tan Republican No Candidate 27,247 5.60% 0Socialist Eugene V. Debs 8,121 1.67% 0 Totals 486,824 100.00% 20 Voter turnout (voting age) — Results by county CountyJames M. CoxDemocraticWarren G. HardingRepublicanJames E. FergusonAmericanNo candidateBlack and Tan RepublicanEugene V. DebsSocialistTotal votescast # % # % # % # % # % Anderson 2,355 59.98% 323 8.23% 267 6.80% 906 23.08% 75 1.91% 3,926 Andrews 74 89.16% 9 10.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 83 Angelina 1,661 62.16% 205 7.67% 589 22.04% 119 4.45% 98 3.67% 2,672 Aransas 146 74.87% 49 25.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 195 Archer 449 69.61% 169 26.20% 20 3.10% 0 0.00% 7 1.09% 645 Armstrong 405 81.49% 87 17.51% 1 0.20% 1 0.20% 3 0.60% 497 Atascosa 531 69.23% 185 24.12% 32 4.17% 7 0.91% 12 1.56% 767 Austin 538 18.62% 568 19.65% 1,682 58.20% 87 3.01% 15 0.52% 2,890 Bandera 311 50.90% 249 40.75% 33 5.40% 0 0.00% 18 2.95% 611 Bastrop 1,088 50.23% 484 22.35% 441 20.36% 147 6.79% 6 0.28% 2,166 Baylor 632 73.57% 139 16.18% 61 7.10% 0 0.00% 27 3.14% 859 Bee 545 59.05% 283 30.66% 77 8.34% 0 0.00% 18 1.95% 923 Bell 3,595 59.12% 483 7.94% 1,759 28.93% 168 2.76% 76 1.25% 6,081 Bexar 6,926 40.63% 8,894 52.18% 498 2.92% 557 3.27% 171 1.00% 17,046 Blanco 426 24.94% 378 22.13% 886 51.87% 14 0.82% 4 0.23% 1,708 Borden 89 84.76% 4 3.81% 11 10.48% 0 0.00% 1 0.95% 105 Bosque 1,556 61.16% 567 22.29% 364 14.31% 28 1.10% 29 1.14% 2,544 Bowie 2,396 62.22% 1,032 26.80% 31 0.80% 254 6.60% 138 3.58% 3,851 Brazoria 1,184 45.45% 1,235 47.41% 110 4.22% 25 0.96% 51 1.96% 2,605 Brazos 1,281 58.98% 277 12.75% 107 4.93% 502 23.11% 5 0.23% 2,172 Brewster 210 60.52% 125 36.02% 8 2.31% 0 0.00% 4 1.15% 347 Briscoe 262 78.92% 39 11.75% 22 6.63% 0 0.00% 9 2.71% 332 Brooks 127 77.44% 37 22.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 164 Brown 1,708 70.11% 397 16.30% 289 11.86% 14 0.57% 28 1.15% 2,436 Burleson 981 49.35% 141 7.09% 405 20.37% 459 23.09% 2 0.10% 1,988 Burnet 795 62.60% 241 18.98% 225 17.72% 0 0.00% 9 0.71% 1,270 Caldwell 1,240 59.99% 269 13.01% 336 16.26% 218 10.55% 4 0.19% 2,067 Calhoun 363 64.71% 95 16.93% 36 6.42% 34 6.06% 33 5.88% 561 Callahan 804 66.78% 213 17.69% 153 12.71% 0 0.00% 34 2.82% 1,204 Cameron 920 49.84% 909 49.24% 4 0.22% 1 0.05% 12 0.65% 1,846 Camp 661 50.04% 156 11.81% 58 4.39% 442 33.46% 4 0.30% 1,321 Carson 428 66.15% 208 32.15% 3 0.46% 0 0.00% 8 1.24% 647 Cass 1,563 46.01% 1,446 42.57% 151 4.45% 184 5.42% 53 1.56% 3,397 Castro 158 56.03% 118 41.84% 3 1.06% 0 0.00% 3 1.06% 282 Chambers 240 42.63% 278 49.38% 30 5.33% 2 0.36% 13 2.31% 563 Cherokee 2,233 62.51% 478 13.38% 525 14.70% 260 7.28% 76 2.13% 3,572 Childress 1,206 83.98% 158 11.00% 27 1.88% 1 0.07% 44 3.06% 1,436 Clay 1,324 72.71% 446 24.49% 34 1.87% 3 0.16% 14 0.77% 1,821 Coke 444 78.58% 59 10.44% 39 6.90% 0 0.00% 23 4.07% 565 Coleman 1,445 65.27% 355 16.03% 334 15.09% 4 0.18% 76 3.43% 2,214 Collin 4,045 70.01% 1,338 23.16% 261 4.52% 31 0.54% 103 1.78% 5,778 Collingsworth 640 63.56% 307 30.49% 8 0.79% 1 0.10% 51 5.06% 1,007 Colorado 765 30.91% 477 19.27% 822 33.21% 346 13.98% 65 2.63% 2,475 Comal 181 9.95% 765 42.03% 841 46.21% 2 0.11% 31 1.70% 1,820 Comanche 1,633 57.10% 930 32.52% 197 6.89% 0 0.00% 100 3.50% 2,860 Concho 405 60.00% 151 22.37% 100 14.81% 1 0.15% 18 2.67% 675 Cooke 2,170 64.05% 1,003 29.60% 60 1.77% 89 2.63% 66 1.95% 3,388 Coryell 1,542 56.65% 444 16.31% 714 26.23% 8 0.29% 14 0.51% 2,722 Cottle 472 71.08% 121 18.22% 9 1.36% 2 0.30% 60 9.04% 664 Crockett 89 52.05% 80 46.78% 1 0.58% 0 0.00% 1 0.58% 171 Crosby 572 73.15% 146 18.67% 29 3.71% 2 0.26% 33 4.22% 782 Culberson 40 85.11% 6 12.77% 1 2.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 47 Dallam 478 64.95% 195 26.49% 23 3.13% 0 0.00% 40 5.43% 736 Dallas 14,390 67.41% 4,984 23.35% 200 0.94% 1,638 7.67% 135 0.63% 21,347 Dawson 296 70.64% 75 17.90% 23 5.49% 0 0.00% 25 5.97% 419 Deaf Smith 459 68.92% 205 30.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.30% 666 Delta 1,081 72.16% 315 21.03% 29 1.94% 50 3.34% 23 1.54% 1,498 Denton 1,257 48.35% 900 34.62% 302 11.62% 82 3.15% 59 2.27% 2,600 Dewitt 971 29.34% 1,277 38.59% 647 19.55% 394 11.91% 20 0.60% 3,309 Dickens 433 74.78% 109 18.83% 8 1.38% 0 0.00% 29 5.01% 579 Dimmit 231 67.35% 108 31.49% 1 0.29% 0 0.00% 3 0.87% 343 Donley 766 76.52% 206 20.58% 1 0.10% 0 0.00% 28 2.80% 1,001 Duval 1,081 92.08% 86 7.33% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 6 0.51% 1,174 Eastland 2,942 72.30% 941 23.13% 92 2.26% 0 0.00% 94 2.31% 4,069 Ector 100 80.00% 23 18.40% 2 1.60% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 125 Edwards 201 38.00% 297 56.14% 17 3.21% 0 0.00% 14 2.65% 529 El Paso 4,143 50.00% 4,070 49.12% 10 0.12% 8 0.10% 55 0.66% 8,286 Ellis 4,081 69.68% 819 13.98% 621 10.60% 321 5.48% 15 0.26% 5,857 Erath 1,914 69.78% 358 13.05% 384 14.00% 15 0.55% 72 2.62% 2,743 Falls 1,878 48.36% 585 15.07% 635 16.35% 731 18.83% 54 1.39% 3,883 Fannin 3,461 66.79% 1,103 21.29% 183 3.53% 319 6.16% 116 2.24% 5,182 Fayette 932 20.59% 1,101 24.32% 2,128 47.01% 356 7.86% 10 0.22% 4,527 Fisher 743 74.75% 152 15.29% 30 3.02% 1 0.10% 68 6.84% 994 Floyd 841 78.89% 167 15.67% 17 1.59% 1 0.09% 40 3.75% 1,066 Foard 491 78.06% 101 16.06% 1 0.16% 0 0.00% 36 5.72% 629 Fort Bend 27 2.91% 0 0.00% 514 55.33% 388 41.77% 0 0.00% 929 Freestone 1,463 53.16% 378 13.74% 254 9.23% 630 22.89% 27 0.98% 2,752 Frio 421 79.14% 102 19.17% 2 0.38% 2 0.38% 5 0.94% 532 Gaines 134 93.71% 9 6.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 143 Galveston 2,933 54.63% 1,625 30.27% 645 12.01% 108 2.01% 58 1.08% 5,369 Garza 392 82.88% 28 5.92% 42 8.88% 0 0.00% 11 2.33% 473 Gillespie 137 6.51% 1,270 60.36% 681 32.37% 0 0.00% 16 0.76% 2,104 Glasscock 91 77.78% 25 21.37% 1 0.85% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 117 Goliad 448 38.52% 513 44.11% 114 9.80% 66 5.67% 22 1.89% 1,163 Gonzales 1,299 52.29% 748 30.11% 256 10.31% 167 6.72% 14 0.56% 2,484 Gray 529 65.23% 251 30.95% 7 0.86% 0 0.00% 24 2.96% 811 Grayson 5,241 65.97% 2,125 26.75% 103 1.30% 351 4.42% 125 1.57% 7,945 Gregg 1,050 68.99% 257 16.89% 29 1.91% 177 11.63% 9 0.59% 1,522 Grimes 1,027 70.88% 214 14.77% 200 13.80% 4 0.28% 4 0.28% 1,449 Guadalupe 560 17.33% 1,839 56.90% 760 23.51% 69 2.13% 4 0.12% 3,232 Hale 1,279 76.18% 352 20.96% 20 1.19% 0 0.00% 28 1.67% 1,679 Hall 922 76.58% 194 16.11% 33 2.74% 1 0.08% 54 4.49% 1,204 Hamilton 1,075 64.29% 422 25.24% 151 9.03% 5 0.30% 19 1.14% 1,672 Hansford 124 67.39% 54 29.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 3.26% 184 Hardeman 967 73.04% 252 19.03% 61 4.61% 0 0.00% 44 3.32% 1,324 Hardin 999 72.60% 202 14.68% 89 6.47% 58 4.22% 28 2.03% 1,376 Harris 14,808 51.35% 7,735 26.82% 693 2.40% 5,289 18.34% 312 1.08% 28,837 Harrison 2,134 67.09% 377 11.85% 86 2.70% 576 18.11% 8 0.25% 3,181 Hartley 144 61.54% 81 34.62% 2 0.85% 0 0.00% 7 2.99% 234 Haskell 1,127 68.85% 254 15.52% 111 6.78% 0 0.00% 145 8.86% 1,637 Hays 1,075 64.92% 242 14.61% 322 19.44% 16 0.97% 1 0.06% 1,656 Hemphill 417 61.50% 253 37.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8 1.18% 678 Henderson 1,684 58.29% 538 18.62% 370 12.81% 124 4.29% 173 5.99% 2,889 Hidalgo 2,409 67.69% 1,108 31.13% 21 0.59% 2 0.06% 19 0.53% 3,559 Hill 3,254 63.12% 1,022 19.83% 800 15.52% 48 0.93% 31 0.60% 5,155 Hood 697 68.33% 175 17.16% 101 9.90% 27 2.65% 20 1.96% 1,020 Hopkins 2,548 68.98% 837 22.66% 99 2.68% 99 2.68% 111 3.00% 3,694 Houston 1,475 49.48% 385 12.92% 584 19.59% 451 15.13% 86 2.88% 2,981 Howard 703 77.51% 107 11.80% 43 4.74% 0 0.00% 54 5.95% 907 Hudspeth 97 71.85% 37 27.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.74% 135 Hunt 4,397 75.97% 880 15.20% 228 3.94% 204 3.52% 79 1.36% 5,788 Hutchinson 135 54.66% 106 42.91% 2 0.81% 0 0.00% 4 1.62% 247 Irion 148 66.07% 45 20.09% 25 11.16% 0 0.00% 6 2.68% 224 Jack 566 64.25% 253 28.72% 14 1.59% 0 0.00% 48 5.45% 881 Jackson 562 53.27% 355 33.65% 115 10.90% 5 0.47% 18 1.71% 1,055 Jasper 793 72.42% 62 5.66% 211 19.27% 18 1.64% 11 1.00% 1,095 Jeff Davis 91 68.94% 41 31.06% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 132 Jefferson 4,246 65.83% 1,110 17.21% 143 2.22% 802 12.43% 149 2.31% 6,450 Jim Hogg 70 75.27% 23 24.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 93 Jim Wells 304 58.02% 169 32.25% 38 7.25% 0 0.00% 13 2.48% 524 Johnson 3,041 71.99% 661 15.65% 400 9.47% 46 1.09% 76 1.80% 4,224 Jones 1,792 78.53% 270 11.83% 152 6.66% 0 0.00% 68 2.98% 2,282 Karnes 642 41.47% 484 31.27% 403 26.03% 16 1.03% 3 0.19% 1,548 Kaufman 3,070 68.80% 573 12.84% 215 4.82% 573 12.84% 31 0.69% 4,462 Kendall 142 12.25% 846 72.99% 163 14.06% 2 0.17% 6 0.52% 1,159 Kent 214 75.62% 45 15.90% 0 0.00% 1 0.35% 23 8.13% 283 Kerr 612 53.26% 464 40.38% 48 4.18% 0 0.00% 25 2.18% 1,149 Kimble 299 60.90% 150 30.55% 29 5.91% 0 0.00% 13 2.65% 491 King 157 98.13% 0 0.00% 1 0.63% 0 0.00% 2 1.25% 160 Kinney 98 39.68% 137 55.47% 11 4.45% 0 0.00% 1 0.40% 247 Kleberg 455 67.61% 172 25.56% 27 4.01% 10 1.49% 9 1.34% 673 Knox 773 75.05% 159 15.44% 64 6.21% 0 0.00% 34 3.30% 1,030 Lamar 3,765 75.21% 639 12.76% 87 1.74% 459 9.17% 56 1.12% 5,006 Lamb 264 63.01% 136 32.46% 14 3.34% 0 0.00% 5 1.19% 419 Lampasas 778 57.72% 227 16.84% 328 24.33% 5 0.37% 10 0.74% 1,348 La Salle 252 80.25% 53 16.88% 8 2.55% 0 0.00% 1 0.32% 314 Lavaca 1,249 39.10% 100 3.13% 1,659 51.94% 144 4.51% 42 1.31% 3,194 Lee 712 32.09% 325 14.65% 836 37.67% 332 14.96% 14 0.63% 2,219 Leon 1,124 54.06% 220 10.58% 616 29.63% 74 3.56% 45 2.16% 2,079 Limestone 2,165 63.86% 408 12.04% 371 10.94% 401 11.83% 45 1.33% 3,390 Lipscomb 350 42.63% 425 51.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 46 5.60% 821 Live Oak 234 47.18% 161 32.46% 56 11.29% 0 0.00% 45 9.07% 496 Llano 665 60.90% 184 16.85% 239 21.89% 1 0.09% 3 0.27% 1,092 Lubbock 1,180 81.27% 204 14.05% 30 2.07% 7 0.48% 31 2.13% 1,452 Lynn 538 78.89% 76 11.14% 56 8.21% 1 0.15% 11 1.61% 682 McCulloch 780 71.17% 210 19.16% 70 6.39% 1 0.09% 35 3.19% 1,096 McLennan 4,975 63.71% 1,655 21.19% 936 11.99% 192 2.46% 51 0.65% 7,809 McMullen 72 67.92% 33 31.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.94% 106 Madison 650 57.73% 63 5.60% 263 23.36% 144 12.79% 6 0.53% 1,126 Marion 430 38.05% 392 34.69% 3 0.27% 304 26.90% 1 0.09% 1,130 Martin 136 77.71% 33 18.86% 6 3.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 175 Mason 304 45.17% 269 39.97% 93 13.82% 0 0.00% 7 1.04% 673 Matagorda 992 47.44% 918 43.90% 69 3.30% 58 2.77% 54 2.58% 2,091 Maverick 173 36.42% 296 62.32% 1 0.21% 1 0.21% 4 0.84% 475 Medina 519 30.73% 772 45.71% 389 23.03% 2 0.12% 7 0.41% 1,689 Menard 197 46.24% 203 47.65% 3 0.70% 0 0.00% 23 5.40% 426 Midland 271 79.47% 68 19.94% 2 0.59% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 341 Milam 2,598 53.81% 371 7.68% 1,321 27.36% 407 8.43% 131 2.71% 4,828 Mills 669 55.70% 247 20.57% 257 21.40% 0 0.00% 28 2.33% 1,201 Mitchell 694 81.65% 89 10.47% 40 4.71% 0 0.00% 27 3.18% 850 Montague 1,714 71.57% 474 19.79% 53 2.21% 0 0.00% 154 6.43% 2,395 Montgomery 935 64.48% 203 14.00% 123 8.48% 144 9.93% 45 3.10% 1,450 Moore 101 87.83% 13 11.30% 1 0.87% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 115 Morris 669 73.68% 164 18.06% 5 0.55% 68 7.49% 2 0.22% 908 Motley 345 88.24% 40 10.23% 1 0.26% 0 0.00% 5 1.28% 391 Nacogdoches 1,794 65.79% 238 8.73% 340 12.47% 276 10.12% 79 2.90% 2,727 Navarro 3,328 64.35% 821 15.87% 744 14.39% 248 4.80% 31 0.60% 5,172 Newton 420 62.87% 58 8.68% 148 22.16% 30 4.49% 12 1.80% 668 Nolan 923 79.98% 175 15.16% 43 3.73% 0 0.00% 13 1.13% 1,154 Nueces 1,246 70.12% 383 21.55% 64 3.60% 50 2.81% 34 1.91% 1,777 Ochiltree 280 67.47% 135 32.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 415 Oldham 139 72.40% 52 27.08% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.52% 192 Orange 1,055 81.47% 121 9.34% 83 6.41% 21 1.62% 15 1.16% 1,295 Palo Pinto 1,645 75.74% 342 15.75% 80 3.68% 11 0.51% 94 4.33% 2,172 Panola 1,086 65.46% 268 16.15% 186 11.21% 95 5.73% 24 1.45% 1,659 Parker 1,765 74.50% 488 20.60% 14 0.59% 0 0.00% 102 4.31% 2,369 Parmer 189 55.43% 140 41.06% 3 0.88% 0 0.00% 9 2.64% 341 Pecos 386 47.42% 394 48.40% 31 3.81% 1 0.12% 2 0.25% 814 Polk 810 63.04% 255 19.84% 139 10.82% 55 4.28% 26 2.02% 1,285 Potter 1,374 77.58% 358 20.21% 10 0.56% 1 0.06% 28 1.58% 1,771 Presidio 238 65.03% 122 33.33% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 5 1.37% 366 Rains 462 58.56% 189 23.95% 16 2.03% 26 3.30% 96 12.17% 789 Randall 360 65.34% 183 33.21% 5 0.91% 0 0.00% 3 0.54% 551 Reagan 49 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 49 Real 177 57.28% 111 35.92% 9 2.91% 1 0.32% 11 3.56% 309 Red River 2,263 63.96% 799 22.58% 98 2.77% 326 9.21% 52 1.47% 3,538 Reeves 457 83.09% 91 16.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.36% 550 Refugio 227 35.19% 360 55.81% 41 6.36% 1 0.16% 16 2.48% 645 Roberts 173 72.38% 60 25.10% 5 2.09% 0 0.00% 1 0.42% 239 Robertson 1,634 64.97% 225 8.95% 515 20.48% 134 5.33% 7 0.28% 2,515 Rockwall 873 87.83% 104 10.46% 11 1.11% 3 0.30% 3 0.30% 994 Runnels 1,197 64.53% 332 17.90% 279 15.04% 4 0.22% 43 2.32% 1,855 Rusk 1,555 54.31% 745 26.02% 242 8.45% 284 9.92% 37 1.29% 2,863 Sabine 637 64.67% 61 6.19% 269 27.31% 10 1.02% 8 0.81% 985 San Augustine 658 42.62% 121 7.84% 749 48.51% 7 0.45% 9 0.58% 1,544 San Jacinto 320 46.31% 7 1.01% 186 26.92% 173 25.04% 5 0.72% 691 San Patricio 620 64.92% 308 32.25% 11 1.15% 0 0.00% 16 1.68% 955 San Saba 874 59.21% 180 12.20% 396 26.83% 3 0.20% 23 1.56% 1,476 Schleicher 211 69.41% 81 26.64% 12 3.95% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 304 Scurry 801 79.62% 151 15.01% 30 2.98% 0 0.00% 24 2.39% 1,006 Shackelford 342 64.90% 116 22.01% 33 6.26% 1 0.19% 35 6.64% 527 Shelby 1,700 72.77% 150 6.42% 220 9.42% 174 7.45% 92 3.94% 2,336 Sherman 170 67.73% 77 30.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 1.59% 251 Smith 2,965 63.45% 707 15.13% 357 7.64% 553 11.83% 91 1.95% 4,673 Somervell 198 52.94% 92 24.60% 51 13.64% 0 0.00% 33 8.82% 374 Starr 418 82.45% 89 17.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 507 Stephens 643 76.09% 141 16.69% 33 3.91% 0 0.00% 28 3.31% 845 Sterling 152 81.72% 17 9.14% 17 9.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 186 Stonewall 356 65.08% 134 24.50% 33 6.03% 1 0.18% 23 4.20% 547 Sutton 190 62.30% 104 34.10% 11 3.61% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 305 Swisher 443 73.59% 148 24.58% 2 0.33% 1 0.17% 8 1.33% 602 Tarrant 12,431 72.66% 3,486 20.38% 191 1.12% 833 4.87% 167 0.98% 17,108 Taylor 1,932 79.25% 300 12.31% 141 5.78% 8 0.33% 57 2.34% 2,438 Terrell 155 57.84% 95 35.45% 12 4.48% 1 0.37% 5 1.87% 268 Terry 270 76.06% 39 10.99% 30 8.45% 0 0.00% 16 4.51% 355 Throckmorton 399 80.12% 72 14.46% 11 2.21% 0 0.00% 16 3.21% 498 Titus 1,094 60.95% 508 28.30% 12 0.67% 144 8.02% 37 2.06% 1,795 Tom Green 1,264 76.61% 256 15.52% 87 5.27% 19 1.15% 24 1.45% 1,650 Travis 3,541 59.97% 1,204 20.39% 719 12.18% 380 6.44% 61 1.03% 5,905 Trinity 643 57.00% 125 11.08% 275 24.38% 51 4.52% 34 3.01% 1,128 Tyler 1,066 76.53% 115 8.26% 128 9.19% 69 4.95% 15 1.08% 1,393 Upshur 1,222 52.45% 616 26.44% 343 14.72% 107 4.59% 42 1.80% 2,330 Upton 46 64.79% 25 35.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 71 Uvalde 743 72.77% 237 23.21% 30 2.94% 0 0.00% 11 1.08% 1,021 Val Verde 418 58.22% 296 41.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 0.56% 718 Van Zandt 1,958 61.07% 728 22.71% 203 6.33% 34 1.06% 283 8.83% 3,206 Victoria 686 36.51% 782 41.62% 329 17.51% 66 3.51% 16 0.85% 1,879 Walker 788 45.73% 404 23.45% 375 21.76% 148 8.59% 8 0.46% 1,723 Waller 674 53.92% 167 13.36% 180 14.40% 224 17.92% 5 0.40% 1,250 Ward 181 68.30% 79 29.81% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 1.89% 265 Washington 796 24.72% 684 21.24% 1,267 39.35% 471 14.63% 2 0.06% 3,220 Webb 633 56.67% 468 41.90% 16 1.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,117 Wharton 836 35.38% 852 36.06% 500 21.16% 124 5.25% 51 2.16% 2,363 Wheeler 516 68.62% 198 26.33% 1 0.13% 1 0.13% 36 4.79% 752 Wichita 3,812 70.46% 1,487 27.49% 26 0.48% 0 0.00% 85 1.57% 5,410 Wilbarger 1,118 72.50% 335 21.73% 34 2.20% 1 0.06% 54 3.50% 1,542 Willacy 53 85.48% 9 14.52% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 62 Williamson 2,677 53.00% 819 16.21% 1,443 28.57% 84 1.66% 28 0.55% 5,051 Wilson 753 42.33% 820 46.09% 192 10.79% 4 0.22% 10 0.56% 1,779 Winkler 17 89.47% 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19 Wise 2,031 74.53% 579 21.25% 64 2.35% 0 0.00% 51 1.87% 2,725 Wood 1,643 51.99% 798 25.25% 480 15.19% 141 4.46% 98 3.10% 3,160 Yoakum 79 97.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 2.47% 81 Young 1,214 82.59% 209 14.22% 8 0.54% 1 0.07% 38 2.59% 1,470 Zapata 50 33.78% 98 66.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 148 Zavala 264 66.84% 101 25.57% 14 3.54% 0 0.00% 16 4.05% 395Bailey"No" No returns were canvassed for Bailey County, Franklin County or Liberty County. Whatever voters existed in these counties were listed in totals for neighbouring counties0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0Franklin"No"0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0Liberty"No"0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0N/A0Totals289,62759.49%113,64623.34%48,0969.88%27,3165.61%8,1391.67%486,824 See also United States presidential elections in Texas Notes References 2 Texas 1920