1914 North East Derbyshire by-election

1914 UK parliamentary by-election April 2022 1914 North East Derbyshire by-election presidential United Kingdom North East Derbyshire (UK Parliament constituency)#Elections in the 1910s 1910 North East Derbyshire (UK Parliament constituency)#Elections in the 1910s 1918 20 May 1914 Bowden 65px Unionist Party (UK) 6,469 39.7% Houfton 65px Liberal Party (UK) 6,155 37.8% Martin Labour Party (UK) 3,669 22.5% 250px MP Subsequent MP Harvey Labour Party (UK) Holmes Liberal Party (UK) The 1914 North East Derbyshire by-election was a Parliamentary by-election held on 20 May 1914.Craig F.W.S. 1987 Chronology of British Parliamentary By-elections 1833–1987 Chichester Parliamentary Research Services 109 The constituency returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post voting system. About a third of the electorate were directly involved in the mining industry. This was the penultimate by-election to take place before the outbreak of the First World War. It demonstrated the weakness of support for the Labour Party in 1914 when opposed by a Liberal Party candidate. Vacancy The by-election was caused by the death of the sitting MP, W. E. Harvey on 28 April 1914 of pneumonia. He had represented the seat since 1907 when he was elected as a Liberal. Electoral history Harvey was a senior figure within the Derbyshire Miners Association and also prominent in the Miners Federation of Great Britain.Who Was Who However, in 1909, when the latter body determined to instruct all sponsored miners MPs to take the Labour party whip, Harvey was forced to change his political allegiance. He was re-elected as a Labour candidate in both 1910 general elections when the Liberal party decided not to put up a separate candidate and instead to support Harvey.British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 At the last general election, he was comfortably returned; thumb|right|120px|Harvey General election December 1910: North East DerbyshireBritish parliamentary election results 1885-1918 Labour Party (UK) W. E. Harvey 7,838 56.3 -1.3 Conservative Party (UK) Josiah Court 6,088 43.7 +1.3 1,750 12.6 -2.6 13,926 78.7 -6.8 Labour Party (UK) -1.3 Candidates As the constituency dominated by the mining industry, the seat had been effectively in the gift of the Derbyshire Miners Association. The Derbyshire Miners executive took the unusual action of appointing their own Election Agent, Bertam Mather rather than looking to use the local Liberal Agent or even a Labour Party agent. Their front-runners for the nomination were their president, James Martin and their Chief Secretary Frank Hall. The appointment of the Labour party supporting Mather suggested that Hall would get the nomination."The By-Elections." Times [London, England] 2 May 1914: 10. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 2 Mar. 2014. Hall was prepared to sign the constitution of the Labour party."A Candidate's Laugh." Times [London, England] 4 May 1914: 10. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 2 Mar. 2014. Martin on the other hand was sympathetic to the Liberal party. He was a member of the local Liberal executive and a sub-agent for the party in his own district."Derbyshire Miners." Times [London, England] 12 May 1914: 5. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 2 Mar 2014. thumb|120px|Houfton When the council of the Derbyshire Miners met they decided to overturn the executive's preference for Hall and voted to nominate Martin. Mather however remained in control as election agent. Mather met with the Labour party who insisted that Martin be made to sign the constitution of the Labour party."Grimsby Election." Times [London, England] 5 May 1914: 9. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 2 Mar. 2014. Under pressure Martin agreed which meant he subsequently would stand as a Labour party candidate rather than as a Liberal. The local Liberal Association had been willing to adopt Martin as their candidate. They had warned that if Martin decided to run for the Labour party rather than as a Liberal, they would adopt their own candidate. To this end they invited John Houfton to be their candidate, though it was thought that he might turn down the Liberal offer,Derby Daily Telegraph, 7 May 1914 he consented to stand.Derby Daily Telegraph, 8 May 1914 58-year-old Houfton, was a native of ChesterfieldDerby Daily Telegraph, 8 May 1914 and owned the Bolsover Colliery Company.Derby Daily Telegraph, 7 May 1914 The Unionists had selected a new candidate in 41-year-old mechanical engineer Major Harland Bowden from Durham.The Constitutional Year Book 1914, p.3 Bowden had been active in the constituency for some time."Death Of A Labour Member." Times [London, England] 29 Apr. 1914: 10. The Times Digital Archive. Web. 2 Mar. 2014. In April 1912 Bowden had been adopted as the party's prospective candidate for the constituency.Derbyshire (North-East) The times 29 April 1912 6 Campaign The Liberal campaign was dealt an early blow when their Constituency Organiser, Samuel Short, who would have been their By-election Agent, died.Derby Daily Telegraph, 2 May 1914 Given that a third of the electorate were directly involved in the mining industry, issues affecting the industry should have dominated the campaign. However the issues surrounding the selection of Martin caused a falling out between the Liberal and Labour parties that cast a shadow over other issues. For the Labour Party, this seemed like an ideal situation to take on the Liberal Party over the issue of miners representation. Their candidate had the official backing of the local miners association and their Liberal opponent was one of bosses the union dealt with. John Houfton attended the national Liberal Council meeting where he gave a speech about the by-election, in an effort to rally Liberal support from outside the constituency.Derby Daily Telegraph, 15 May 1914 On the 14 May nominations closed to confirm that the election would be a three-cornered contest.Derby Daily Telegraph, 14 May 1914 The Liberal campaign issued a leaflet entitled 'The Houfton Herald' which presented the issues in national politics in clear and emphatic language.Derby Daily Telegraph, 15 May 1914 Result Electors went to the polls on 20 May 1914. Despite a fall in the Unionist vote share, their candidate gained the seat from the Labour Party, due to a split in the progressive vote; thumb|right|120px|Bowden North East Derbyshire by-election, 1914British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 Conservative Party (UK) George Robert Harland Bowden 6,469 39.7 -4.0 Liberal Party (UK) John Houfton 6,155 37.8 New Labour Party (UK) James Martin 3,669 22.5 -33.8 314 1.9 N/A 16,293 84.2 +5.5 Conservative Party (UK) Labour Party (UK) +14.9 Bowden attributed his victory mainly to his opposition to Irish Home Rule, but also for his opposition to the National Insurance Act."Portraits and Personal Notes." Illustrated London News [London, England] 30 May 1914: 886. Illustrated London News. Web. 4 May 2014. This attribution flew in the face of the fact that 60.3% of the electorate voted for candidates who supported Irish Home Rule. Despite the miners union fielding a Labour Party candidate, it appeared as if the majority of miners decided to vote Liberal. It also indicated that regardless of any local situation, voters were more likely to be influenced by the national situation. The election result confirmed the weakness of the Labour Party as an electoral force when challenged by a Liberal candidate. The result was a humiliation for the Labour Party and a lesson to the Derbyshire Miners Association about party affiliation. Aftermath A General Election was due to take place by the end of 1915. By the autumn of 1914, the following candidates had been adopted to contest that election. Unionist: George Robert Harland Bowden Liberal: John HouftonDerby Daily Telegraph, 13 July 1914 Due to the outbreak of war, the election never took place. Bowden found himself estranged from the North East Derbyshire Unionist Association, going so far as to issue libel proceedings against the association's vice-chairman.High Court Of Justice 18 October 1919 4 The Times He continued as the MP, but when he faced re-election in 1918 he was denied endorsement from his party leader Bonar Law and the Coalition Government which contributed to his defeat. The local Liberals replaced Houfton as their candidate and Labour replaced Martin.British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 General election 1918: North East DerbyshireBritish parliamentary election results 1918-1949 Liberal Party (UK) Stanley Holmes 6,117 31.4 -6.4 Labour Party (UK) Frank Lee 5,560 28.6 +6.1 Independent Unionist George Robert Harland Bowden 5,049 25.9 -13.8 Coalition Unionist Edward Cavendish 2,738 14.1 -25.6 557 2.8 N/A 19,464 58.0 -26.2 Liberal Party (UK) Unionist Party (UK) +3.7 The Derbyshire Miners Association continued to find itself at odds with the Miners Federation of Great Britain over matters other than candidate selection and party allegiance. During the General Strike of 1926, the Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire miners brokered a deal with the local colliery owners, led by Houfton. However, the deal was opposed by the MFGB which resulted in a formal split in the local miners unions that lasted into the 1930s. References Category:By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in Derbyshire constituencies North East Derbyshire by-election North East Derbyshire by-election North East Derbyshire by-election Category:1910s in Derbyshire