Skip to main content

  | मौसम…

411 समाचार
Public archive edition · Attributed source reporting with original dates · AI drafts are excluded

411 REFERENCE · Wikipedia

2009 California Proposition 1E

Reference material by Wikipedia contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.

none Proposition 1E Mental Health Service Funding. Temporary Reallocation. Helps Balance State Budget. May 19, 2009 California 1,597,907 3,169,163 4,767,070 300px County results Against #8B8B54 70–80% 1px #AAAAAA solid #BCBC83 60–70% 1px #AAAAAA solid #DEDEBD 50–60% 1px #AAAAAA solid Proposition 1E was a defeated California ballot proposition that appeared on the May 19, 2009 special election ballot. The measure was legislatively referred by the State Legislature. If passed Proposition 1E would have authorized a one-time reallocation of income tax revenue to help balance the state budget. Background In February 2009, the State Legislature narrowly passed the 2008–2009 state budget during a special session, months after it was due. As part of the plan to lower the state's annual deficits, the State Legislature ordered a special election with various budget reform ballot propositions, among them Proposition 1E.http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/analysis/prop1a.htm Proposition 1A Analysis - Voter Information Guide 2009 California Secretary of State 2009-05-08 dead https://web.archive.org/web/20090507104534/http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov/analysis/prop1a.htm May 7, 2009 The proposition was part of Senate Bill 10 (Third Extraordinary Session), which was authored by Senator Denise Ducheny, a Democrat from San Diego.http://leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sbx3_10&sess=CUR&house=B&author=ducheny Bill Documents: SBX3 10 California Office of the Legislative Counsel 2009-07-14 The bill passed in the State Senate by a vote of 36 to 2 and in the State Assembly by a vote of 76 to 4. Proposal Proposition 1E would have authorized a fund-shift of approximately $230 million annually in income tax surcharge revenue currently earmarked for specified mental health programs under the terms of Proposition 63, also known as the Mental Health Services Act. For two years that revenue would have instead be used to pay for the state's share of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment Program, a federally mandated Medicaid program for low income persons under age 21. At the time, revenue for this program came from the state's General Fund.http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/analysis/prop1e.htm Proposition 1E Analysis - Voter Information Guide 2009 California Secretary of State 2009-07-14 dead https://web.archive.org/web/20090709001220/http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/analysis/prop1e.htm July 9, 2009 The earmarked Proposition 63 revenue that would be diverted comes from a 1% state income tax surcharge imposed on the portion of a taxpayer's taxable income in excess of $1 million. In the past, this surcharge has taken in between $900 million and $1.5 billion annually. Results Proposition 1Ehttp://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2009-special/complete-sov.pdf Statement of Vote: May 19, 2009, Statewide Special Election California Secretary of State PDF 2009-06-26 2009-07-14 https://web.archive.org/web/20090716155759/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2009-special/complete-sov.pdf# 2009-07-16 dead 1597907 4767070 3169163 17153012 104875 References External links Text of Proposition 1E 1E