2008 Oregon Ballot Measure 62

none February 2026 Measure 62 Allocates 15% Of Lottery Proceeds To Public Safety Fund For Crime Prevention, Investigation, Prosecution. Oregon 674,428 1,035,756 1,710,184 85.7 Oregon 2008 Measure 62.svg Results by county Yes #B6C8D9 50%-60% No #DEDEBD 50%-60% #BCBC83 60%-70% #8b8b54 70%-80% county Source: Oregon Secretary of State Bradbury Bill Bill Bradbury Official Results – November 4, 2008 General Election Elections Division Oregon Secretary of State 4 November 2008 http://records.sos.state.or.us/ORSOSWebDrawer/Recordpdf/6873598 Website December 24, 2008 September 4, 2020 https://web.archive.org/web/20200904091529/http://records.sos.state.or.us/ORSOSWebDrawer/Recordpdf/6873598 dead Oregon Ballot Measure 62 (2008) (formerly IRR 41) appeared on the November 4, 2008 general election ballot in Oregon. It was an initiated constitutional amendment dealing with the issue of where a percentage of profit from the Oregon State Lottery should go. The initiative, if it had passed, would have required that 15% of net lottery proceeds be deposited in a public safety fund. 50% of that fund would have been distributed to counties to fund grants for childhood programs, district attorney operations, and sheriff's investigations. The other 50% of the fund would have gone to Oregon State Police criminal investigations and forensic operations.Initiative summaryOregonLive.com: "Two more initiatives qualify for Ore. ballot", The Oregonian, July 21, 2008 It is expected that most of that money would have been diverted from schools. It was rejected with around 60% of the votes statewide; every county except for Josephine saw majority rejection. Background The official ballot title is: Allocates 15% Of Lottery Proceeds To Public Safety Fund For Crime Prevention, Investigation, Prosecution Measure 62 has become unofficially known as the "Oregon C.S.I. Measure".http://news.opb.org/article/3175-ballot-measure-62-oregon-csi-measure/ Oregon Public Broadcasting, "Ballot Measure 62: 'The Oregon: C.S.I. Measure'", September 29, 2008 December 25, 2008 December 4, 2008 https://web.archive.org/web/20081204043116/http://news.opb.org/article/3175-ballot-measure-62-oregon-csi-measure/ dead Specific provisions Where the money would go: 20% for grants to counties to fund early childhood programs for children who are at risk; 50% to fund the criminal investigation and forensics operations (including crime lab) of the Oregon State Police to assist law enforcement throughout the state; 15% to provide grants to countries to supplement existing county appropriations for the operations of District Attorneys; 15% to provide grants to counties to supplement existing county appropriations for investigation and field operations of county sheriffs. Estimated fiscal impact The state's Financial Estimate Committee prepares estimated fiscal impact statements for any ballot measures that will appear on the ballot. The estimate prepared by this committee for Measure 62 says: Measure 62 would require public safety spending from the state lottery fund of $100 million in the first year, increasing in subsequent years depending on how much money goes into the state lottery fund from the sales of tickets in the Oregon state-sponsored lottery.,Voters' Pamphlet includes Estimated fiscal impact statement for Oregon Measure 62http://blogs.registerguard.com/cms/index.php/capitol-notebook//comments/digging_deeper_into_ballot_measure/ Register Guard, "Digging deeper into state ballot measures", August 7, 2008 December 25, 2008 https://web.archive.org/web/20081206022718/http://blogs.registerguard.com/cms/index.php/capitol-notebook//comments/digging_deeper_into_ballot_measure/ December 6, 2008 dead mdy-all Supporters The measure was sponsored by chief petitioners Duane Fletchall, Steve Beck, and Kevin Mannix. Arguments in favor of Measure 62 Notable arguments made in favor of Measure 62 included: More money going into crime investigations will help reduce the backlog of investigations. Currently, some crimes in Oregon aren't investigated using modern forensic techniques because the resources don't exist. Rural counties especially need the help funding investigations. The money is needed to help stabilize funding for state police investigations.http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/opb/posts/list/1557410.page Oregon Public Broadcasting, "Measure 62: Lottery Funds", September 8, 2008 December 25, 2008 https://web.archive.org/web/20090107031856/http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/opb/posts/list/1557410.page January 7, 2009 dead Opponents Defend Oregon opposed Measure 62. Arguments against Measure 62 Notable arguments made against Measure 62 include: It would divert money from the lottery that would otherwise go to schools.http://www.basicrights.org/?p=400 Basic Rights Oregon, "This Election Season Make Sure to Vote No on Measures 59, 62 and 64!" 2008-12-25 https://web.archive.org/web/20081023141128/http://www.basicrights.org/?p=400 2008-10-23 dead From the Oregonian's No on 62 endorsement: "Ballot Measure 62 is one more in a long line of gratuitous assaults on good government in Oregon. Ill-conceived and poorly crafted, the measure would rip millions of lottery dollars from where they are most needed -- Oregon classrooms -- and squander them in a hodgepodge of public safety causes." Donors opposing Measure 62 Defend Oregon, as a committee, fought seven different ballot measures, and supported two others. As a result, it is not possible to discern how much of its campaign money was going specifically to defeat Measure 61. Altogether, the group raised over $6 million in 2008.Campaign finance history of Defend Oregon for 2008 Major donations to the Defend Oregon group as of October 8 included:Record of donations to Defend Oregon $4.1 million from the Oregon Education Association., Oregon Live, "Teachers, nurses add $2.5 million to campaigns", September 10, 2008The Oregonian, "OEA puts $4 million into ballot measure fight", October 8, 2008 $100,000 from School Employees Exercising Democracy (SEED)Oregonian, "School workers add $100,000 to campaign", August 25, 2008 $100,000 from the AFL-CIO. $50,000 from Oregon AFSCME Council 75. Newspaper endorsements Here is how Oregon's major newspapers endorsed on the measure. Newspapers Yes No The Oregonian No Medford Mail-Tribune No Statesman Journal Yes Bend Bulletin No Portland Tribune No Eugene Register-Guard No Daily Astorian No East Oregonian No Corvallis Gazette Times No Coos Bay The World No Willamette Week No Yamhill Valley News Register No Gresham Outlook No Notes External links Chief Petitioner Kevin Mannix on BallotPedia.org Oregon Voters' Pamphlet for Measures includes Explanatory Statement 2008 General Election: Voter Guide Information and status on this initiative from the Secretary of State Official text of measure Website for the Defend Oregon Coalition Category:2008 Oregon ballot measures Category:Oregon Lottery Category:Rejected amendments to the Constitution of Oregon Category:Initiatives in the United States Category:Gambling ballot measures in the United States