1905 Barkston Ash by-election

UK parliamentary by-election April 2022 1905 Barkston Ash by-election presidential United Kingdom Barkston Ash (UK Parliament constituency)#Elections in the 1900s 1900 Barkston Ash (UK Parliament constituency)#Elections in the 1900s 1906 13 October 1905 Andrews Liberal Party (UK) 4,376 51.3% Lane-Fox 85px Conservative Party (UK) 4,148 48.7% MP Subsequent MP Sir Robert Gunter Conservative Party (UK) George Lane-Fox Conservative Party (UK) The 1905 Barkston Ash by-election was a Parliamentary by-election held on 13 October 1905.Craig F.W.S. 1987 Chronology of British Parliamentary By-elections 1833–1987 Chichester Parliamentary Research Services 99 The constituency returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post voting system. Vacancy The by-election was caused by the death, on 18 September 1905, of the sitting Conservative MP Sir Robert Gunter. Gunter had been seriously ill with neuritis and phlebitis since June 1905 and had been unconscious for several days before his death.The Times, 19 September 1905 p4 Electoral history Barkston Ash was a safe Tory seat. It had been represented by Gunter since it was created in 1885. Gunter had been unopposed at the 1900 general election and also in 1895. The last contest had come in 1892, with Gunter winning easily; thumb|120px|Robert Gunter General election 1892: Barkston AshBritish Parliamentary Election Results 1885-1918, FWS Craig Conservative Party (UK) Robert Gunter 4,161 58.8 N/A Liberal Party (UK) Archibald William Scarr 2,920 41.2 New 1,241 17.6 N/A 7.081 76.0 N/A Conservative Party (UK) N/A Candidates Conservatives Because of ill health, Gunter had told his local party in 1903, that he would be standing down as MP. They had then selected 35 year old George Lane-Fox, an Eton and Oxford educated barrister and a member of the West Riding County CouncilThe Times, 9 October 1905 p11 to be their candidate. Liberals The Liberals had already selected 32 year old Joseph Andrews, a barrister from Leeds to fight the next general election.The Times, 12 April 1905 p5 They adopted Andrews as their by-election candidate. Other There was speculation that an independent candidate, Henry Liversidge, would also stand. Earlier in 1905 he announced an intention to contest the next election as a Lib-Lab candidate, but on the platform of tariff reform.The Times, 22 September 1905 It was subsequently reported that no Tariff Reform League or other candidate would be standing specifically on that issue.The Times, 25 September 1905 p9 Campaign The political tide seemed to be flowing against the Tory government of Arthur Balfour. In 1903 they had lost five seats in by-elections, in 1904 another seven and six seats had been gained by the Liberals in by-elections so far in 1905.Roy Douglas, History of the Liberal Party 1895-1970; Sidgwick & Jackson, 1971 p30 Tariff Reform Although no tariff candidate entered the field, the issue of protectionism was one of the great issues of the day. Whereas the question of Irish Home Rule had dominated political debate in earlier elections, the ‘dumping’ of foreign goods on British markets and the struggle between tariff reformers and free traders was now seen as a prime election battleground.The Times, 3 October 1905 p7 The Free Trade Union, founded in 1903 to safeguard the free import of food and raw materials and oppose the policy of protection as a barrier to good relations within the British EmpireChris Cook, Sources in British Political History, 1900-1951 Volume 1; Macmillan, 1975 p101 had acquired a reputation for intelligent and effective electioneering on behalf of Liberal candidates and had moved some key organisers into the Barkston Ash constituency to offer support to Andrews and to campaign and produce literature and posters for him.The Times, 6 October 1905 p5 The Liberals played the Free Trade card for all it was worth.The Times 9 October 1905 p11 Agricultural labour There was a strong mining community in the south of the constituency which traditionally supported the Liberals and a substantial suburban house-holder vote spreading out from Leeds, which together with the farmers and landowners could usually be relied upon to vote Conservative. This meant the agricultural labourers held the key to the result.The Times, 4 October 1905 p11 Both candidates courted the votes of the rural worker, Andrews emphasising the value of Free Trade in keeping food prices cheap whereas Lane-Fox appealed to the traditional conservatism of rural people. Religion Both candidates also, despite denials were keen to attract votes from the sizeable Roman Catholic minority in the area. The Liberals denounced the Education Act 1902 and hoped for Catholic voters to be sympathetic to Irish Home Rule in support of their co-religionists in Ireland although as the campaign wore on they became vulnerable to attack on the administration of the Education Act by the Liberal controlled West Riding County Council.The Times, 11 October 1905 p8 The Tories looked to the well-established local Catholic community to remain true to their family traditions and support the Conservative establishment. Foreign affairs Government policy abroad gave the Liberals little to campaign on. There was a distinct strain of English patriotism in the Yorkshire character and the area had provided strong support over the fighting of the Boer War. The only area left to exploit was the introduction of Chinese labour into South Africa gold mining operationsThe Times, 12 October 1905 p8 and the allegation that so-called coolies were being forced to work under conditions no better than those of slaves.John Hotchkiss Stewart Reid, The origins of the British Labour Party; University of Minnesota Press, 1955 pp107-108 Result The result of the by-election was announced the following day in front of the Selby Museum.Monitor and New Era 20 October 1905 The Liberals gained Barkston Ash from the Conservatives by a majority of 228 votes. Barkston Ash by-election, 1905British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 by Craig Liberal Party (UK) Joseph Andrews 4,376 51.3 New Conservative Party (UK) George Lane-Fox 4,148 48.7 N/A 228 2.6 N/A 8,524 83.5 N/A Liberal Party (UK) Conservative Party (UK) N/A Irish Nationalist MP T. P. O'Connor called the election "a victory for Ireland" because "of the firmness with which (voters) refused to Abandon Ireland" and "have buried the infamous attempt to weaken Ireland by a Redistribution Bill." It was another indication of how the electorate across the country, even in such a traditional Tory constituency, had grown tired of the Conservative government which had been in office for ten years. It was this swing of the pendulum, rather than the specific policy issues or personalities of the candidates, which was responsible for the Liberal victoryThe Times, 16 October 1905 p7 – although the question of tariff reform was clearly an influential element in the result and the campaigning efforts of the Free Trade Union played their part in stimulating the electorate and getting them to the polls in greater numbers than their opponents.The Times, 13 October 1905 p8 Aftermath Despite the 1906 Liberal landslide Lane-Fox was returned to parliament three months later and the constituency remained in Tory hands thereafter. General election 1906: Barkston Ash Conservative Party (UK) George Lane-Fox 4,894 53.5 +4.8 Liberal Party (UK) Joseph Andrews 4,246 46.5 -4.8 548 7.0 N/A 9,140 88.9 +5.4 Conservative Party (UK) Liberal Party (UK) +4.8 As the Commons were not sitting at the time of the by-election, Andrews was one of the few people in history to be elected to parliament but never to take their seat. References See also List of United Kingdom by-elections United Kingdom by-election records Category:1905 in England Category:1905 elections in the United Kingdom Category:By-elections to the Parliament of the United Kingdom in North Yorkshire constituencies Category:1900s in Yorkshire