1983 motorcycle tariff

United States tariff July 2021 The 1983 motorcycle tariff, or Memorandum on Heavyweight Motorcycle Imports, was a presidential memorandum ordering a 45% tariff on heavyweight motorcycles imported to the United States, signed by President Ronald Reagan on April 1, 1983, on the US International Trade Commission's (USITC) recommendation to approve Harley-Davidson's petition for import relief. The tariff expired in 1988.Lemmy Motorcycle tariffs and Harley-Davidson Lessons from the last time https://www.revzilla.com/common-tread/motorcycle-tariffs-and-harley-davidson RevZilla.com RevZilla 21 October 2018 5 March 2018 Harley again requested federal assistance in 1982, this time citing Article XIX of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade of 1974, better known as 'the escape clause.' Background Harley-Davidson was the sole surviving American motorcycle manufacturer.Farnsworth Clyde H. 1983-04-02 U.S. RAISES TARIFF FOR MOTORCYCLES en-US The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/1983/04/02/business/us-raises-tariff-for-motorcycles.html 2023-05-16 0362-4331 All of the company's models in production were heavyweight motorcycles.Klein Daniel Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 32: Taking America for a Ride: The Politics of Motorcycle Tariffs https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/pa032.pdf 2023-05-16 www.cato.org Before the imposition of the tariff, Harley-Davidson was facing a sharp sales decline, mainly due to the competition of Japanese motorcycle companies. Less than a decade before, Harley-Davidson had a 100% market share of 1000cc or larger motorcycles within the US. A decade later, its market share had fallen to less than 15%. Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki, and Kawasaki undercut Harley Davidson by 1500-2000 USD per vehicle. In 1980 Harley-Davidson did US$289 million in sales, which slumped to around US$200 million in just two years. Employees also saw a harsh decline in wages and hours worked. The unsold inventory of bikes doubled during the time period, again due to the undercutting of Japanese counterparts. Request and imposition In the early 1980s, Harley-Davidson petitioned the USITC, saying that Japanese manufacturers were importing motorcycles into the US in such volume as to harm or threaten to harm domestic producers. The USITC agreed (by a 2–1 vote) that Harley-Davidson was entitled to relief, and recommended the tariff structure that was later implemented by the Reagan Administration. Unlike the USITC's recommendation though, Reagan also implemented tariffs onto European manufacturers.The Great Tariff Controversy Cycle World JUNE 1983 https://magazine.cycleworld.com/article/1983/6/1/the-great-tariff-controversy 2023-05-16 Cycle World The Complete Archive en-US The tariff applied to all imported motorcycles with engine displacements greater than 700 cc. Reagan signed a memorandum ordering the tariff on April 1, 1983, and signed Presidential Proclamation 5050 on April 15, enacting 97 Stat. 1574 to the United States Code. Format of the tariff During the first year of the tariff, the tariff was set at 45% then dropping to 35% in the second year. In the third year, the tariff dropped to 20%, then 15% in the fourth year, and 10% in the fifth year.Memorandum on Heavyweight Motorcycle Imports The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/memorandum-heavyweight-motorcycle-imports 2023-05-16 www.presidency.ucsb.edu The total tariffs on foreign motorcycles were 49.4%, 39.4% 24.4%, 19.4% and 14.4% in each year respectively. In order to avoid harming small scale manufacturers, tariff-rate quotas were implemented. These quotas exempted manufacturers from the additional tariffs implemented by the bill, but still required them to pay the 4.5% rate on all motorcycles (as part of a tariff still exists to the present day). 5,000 units (increasing yearly to 6,000, 7,000, 8,500 and 10,000) of motorcycles were tariff exempt for motorcycles manufactured in the Federal Republic of Germany. This tariff applied almost exclusively to BMW motorbikes. 6,000 units (increasing 1,000 yearly) were exempt for motorcycles imported from Japan. 4,000 units (increasing yearly by 1,000) were tariff exempt for all other countries. This tariff did not apply to any bikes manufactured within the country, which made the 90,000 Honda and Kawasaki bikes manufactured within the US exempt. Negotiation with Japanese manufacturers Harley-Davidson subsequently rejected offers of assistance from Japanese motorcycle makers.http://www.japanlaw.info/lawletter/july83/ase.htm 7/83 Us Imposes 45% Tariff on Imported Motorcycles December 12, 2007 dead https://web.archive.org/web/20080308143411/http://www.japanlaw.info/lawletter/july83/ase.htm March 8, 2008 mdy-all – 7/83 US Imposes 45% Tariff on Imported Motorcycles The legislation was also met with great resistance from Japanese authorities, who threatened to file unfair-trade charges against the United States in Geneva. Motorcycle prices were not projected to rise until the backlog of motorcycles had been sold, and then were projected to rise by 10%. Harley-Davidson did offer to drop the request for the tariff in exchange for loan guarantees from the Japanese.Field Greg Darwin Holmstrom The Harley-Davidson Century The Myth of Harley VS. Japan https://books.google.com/books?id=kUidavBaEbUC December 26, 2012 September 1, 2002 MotorBooks International St. Paul, MN USA 0-7603-1155-2 206–207 Before the tariff was even implemented, Harley offered to drop its bid if the Japanese would give Harley loan guarantees of about $15 million to fund development of the Nova project.Harley talks to Big Four, Looks to Triumph Cycle World January 1984 23 1 https://books.google.com/books?id=MvO5RoR1buMC&pg=PA24 The enactment of the import tariff... hasn't kept the two sides -- Harley-Davidson and Japan's Big Four manufacturers--from talking to each other... [Harley has] met with representatives of Honda, Yamaha, Suzuki and Kawasaki to discuss possible alternatives to the tariff. Removal In March 1987, Harley Davidson made an "unprecedented action", and requested the removal of the tariff. "We no longer need tariff relief to compete," said Vaughn L. Beals Jr., Harley-Davidson's chairman and CEO.The tariff was removed by Ronald Reagan on October 9, 1987, where he claimed the action would not harm the domestic industry. October 9, 1987 Motorcycle Tariff Hikes Ended https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-10-09-mn-8697-story.html Los Angeles Times References U.S. Raises Tariff for Motorcycles Clyde H. Farnsworth The New York Times April 2, 1983 https://www.nytimes.com/1983/04/02/business/us-raises-tariff-for-motorcycles.html 1 Executive actions by Ronald Reagan: https://www.reaganlibrary.gov/archives/speech/memorandum-heavyweight-motorcycle-imports Memorandum on Heavyweight Motorcycle Imports Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan April 1, 1983 Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum Proclamation 5050—Temporary Duty Increase and Tariff-Rate Quota on the Importation Into the United States of Certain Heavyweight Motorcycles Ronald Reagan Ronald Reagan April 15, 1983 https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-97/pdf/STATUTE-97-Pg1574.pdf United States Government Publishing Office External links Full text at The American Presidency Project Category:1983 in transport Category:Motorcycle regulation Category:United States trade law Category:Vehicle taxes Category:Motorcycling in the United States Category:1983 in economic history Category:1983 in international relations Category:Tariff laws in the United States Category:United States presidential directives Category:Harley-Davidson Category:Japan–United States relations