1911 Canadian federal election

none September 2023 1911 Canadian federal election Canada 1868 parliamentary no no no 1908 Canadian federal election 1908 1917 Canadian federal election 1917 221 seats in the House of Commons 111 70.2%Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums http://www.elections.ca/content.aspx?section=ele&dir=turn&document=index&lang=e 10 March 2019 ( 0.1 pp) September 21, 1911 12th Canadian Parliament 11th Canadian Parliament 200x200px CA Conservative (historical) nohash Robert Borden February 6, 1901 CA Conservative (historical) name Halifax 85 seats, 46.2% 132 47 632,539 48.56% 2.35 pp 200x200px CA Liberal nohash Wilfrid Laurier June 2, 1887 CA Liberal name SoulangesQuebec EastLaurier was elected in both Soulanges and Quebec East, and chose to serve concurrently as the Member of Parliament for both. 133 seats, 48.9% 85 48 596,871 45.82% 3.05 pp Canada 1911 Federal Election.svg Prime Minister Prime Minister after election Wilfrid Laurier CA Liberal name Robert Borden CA Conservative (historical) name Cdn1911.PNG 380px The Canadian parliament after the 1911 election The 1911 Canadian federal election was held on September 21, 1911, to elect members of the House of Commons of Canada of the 12th Parliament of Canada. The central issue was Liberal support for a proposed agreement with the United States president William Howard Taft to lower tariffs. The Conservative Party denounced it with claims it would weaken ties with Britain, hurt the Canadian economy and Canadian identity, and lead to American annexation of Canada. The idea of a Canadian Navy was also an issue. The Conservatives won, and Robert Borden became the eighth prime minister. The election ended 15 years of government by the Liberal Party of Wilfrid Laurier. Navy The Liberal government was caught up in a debate over the naval arms race between the British Empire and Germany. Laurier attempted a compromise by starting up the Canadian Navy (now the Royal Canadian Navy) but failed to appease either the French-Canadians or English-Canadians: the former refused giving any aid, and the latter suggested sending money directly to Britain. After the election, the Conservatives drew up a bill for naval contributions to the British, but it was held up by a lengthy Liberal filibuster before it was passed in the House of Commons by invoking closure, only to be defeated by the Liberal-controlled Senate. Ties to Britain Many English Canadians in British Columbia and the Maritimes felt that Laurier was abandoning Canada's traditional links to their mother country, Great Britain. On the other side, the Quebec nationalist Henri Bourassa, who had earlier quit the Liberal Party over what he considered the government's pro-British policies, campaigned against Laurier in the province. Ironically, Bourassa's attacks on Laurier in Quebec aided in the election of the Conservatives, who held policies that were more staunchly imperialist than those of the Liberals. In mid-1910, Laurier had attempted to kill the naval issue, which was setting English-Canadians against French-Canadians by opening talks for a reciprocity treaty with the United States. He believed that an economically favourable treaty would appeal to most Canadians and have the additional benefit of dividing the Conservatives between the western wing of the party, which had long wanted free trade with the United States, and the eastern wing, which was more hostile to Continentalism. 1911 Federal Election in Canada Mapleleafweb http://www.mapleleafweb.com/voter-almanac/1911-federal-election-canada 2013-08-15 2013-08-13 https://web.archive.org/web/20130813010307/http://mapleleafweb.com/voter-almanac/1911-federal-election-canada dead In January 1911, Laurier and US President William Howard Taft announced that they signed a reciprocity agreement, which they decided to pass by concurrent legislation rather than a formal treaty, as would normally have been the case. As such, the reciprocity agreement had to be ratified by both houses of the US Congress rather than just the US Senate, which Laurier would later regret. Ties to United States The base of Liberal support shifted to Western Canada, which sought markets for its agricultural products. The party had long been a proponent of free trade with the United States. The protected manufacturing businesses of Central Canada were strongly against the idea. The Liberals, who by ideology and history had strongly supported free trade, decided to make the issue the central plank of their re-election strategy, and they negotiated a free trade agreement in natural products with the United States. Clark speech Allen argues that two speeches by American politicians gave the Conservatives the ammunition needed to arouse anti-American, pro-British sentiments, which provided the winning votes. The Speaker of the US House of Representatives was a Democrat, Champ Clark, and he declared, on the floor of the House, "I look forward to the time when the American flag will fly over every square foot of British North America up to the North Pole. The people of Canada are of our blood and language."Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabasca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 p. 17. Clark went on to suggest in his speech that reciprocity agreement was the first step towards the end of Canada, a speech that was greeted with "prolonged applause" according to the Congressional Record.Allan, Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media p. 18. The Washington Post reported, "Evidently, then, the Democrats generally approved of Mr. Clark's annexation sentiments and voted for the reciprocity bill because, among other things, it improves the prospect of annexation." The Chicago Tribune, in an editorial, condemned Clark and warned that Clark's speech might have fatally damaged the reciprocity agreement in Canada and stated, "He lets his imagination run wild like a Missouri mule on a rampage. Remarks about the absorption of one country by another grate harshly on the ears of the smaller." A Republican Representative, William Stiles Bennet, a member of the House Foreign Relations Committee, introduced a resolution that asked the Taft administration to begin talks with Britain on how the United States might best annex Canada. Taft rejected the proposal and asked the committee to take a vote on the resolution, which only Bennett supported, but the Conservatives now had more ammunition.Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 18. Since Bennett, a strong protectionist, had been an opponent of the reciprocity agreement, the Canadian historian Chantal Allen suggested that Bennett had introduced his resolution deliberately to inflame Canadian opinion against the reciprocity agreement. Clark's speech had already provoked massive outrage in Canada. Bennett's resolution was taken by many Canadians as more proof that the Conservatives were right that the reciprocity agreement would result in the US annexing Canada. The Washington Post noted that the effect of Clark's speech and Bennett's resolution in Canada had "roused the opponents of reciprocity in and out of Parliament to the highest pitch of excitement they have yet reached".Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 pages 18–19. English Canada's most widely read newspaper, The Montreal Daily Star, which had originally supported the Liberals and reciprocity, now did a volte-face and turned against the reciprocity agreement. In an editorial, it wrote, "None of us realized the inward meaning of the shrewdly framed offer of the long headed American government when we first saw it. It was as cunning a trap as ever laid. The master bargainers of Washington have not lost their skill."Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 19. Anti-Americanism Contemporary accounts mentioned in the aftermath of Clark's speech that anti-Americanism was at an all-time high in Canada. Many American newspapers advised their readers that if they visited Canada, they should not identify themselves as American, or they could become the objects of abuse and hatred from the Canadians. The New York Times, in a July 1911 report stated that Laurier was "having the fight of his career to carry reciprocity at all".Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 25. One Conservative MP compared the relationship of Finance Minister William Stevens Fielding and Taft to Samson and Delilah, with Fielding having "succumbed to the Presidential blandishments." When the reciprocity agreement was submitted by Laurier to the House of Commons for ratification by Parliament, the Conservatives waged a vigorous filibuster against the reciprocity agreement on the floor of the House. Although the Liberals still had two years left in their mandate, they decided to call an election to settle the issue after it had aroused controversy, and Laurier was unable to break the filibuster. Borden largely ran on a platform of opposing the reciprocity agreement under the grounds that it would "Americanize" Canada and claimed that there was a secret plan on the part of the Taft administration to annex Canada, with the reciprocity agreement being only the first step.Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 26. In his first speech given in London, Borden declared, "It is beyond doubt that the leading public men of the United States, its leading press, and the mass of its people believe annexation of the Dominion to be the ultimate, inevitable, and desirable result of this proposition, and for that reason support it." To support his claims, the Conservatives produced thousands of pamphlets reproducing the speeches of Clark and Bennett, which encouraged a massive burst of anti-Americanism that was sweeping across English Canada in 1911. One American newspaper wrote that the Conservatives were portraying the Americans as "a corrupt, bragging, boodle-hunting and negro lynching crowd from which Canadian workingmen and the Canadian land of milk and honey must be saved." On 7 September 1911, the Montreal Star published a front-page appeal to all Canadians by the popular British poet Rudyard Kipling, who had been asked by his friend, Max Aitken, to write something for the Conservatives.MacKenzie, David & Dutil, Patrice Canada 1911: The Decisive Election that Shaped the Country, Toronto: Dundurn, 2011 page 211. Kipling wrote in his appeal to Canadians, "It is her own soul that Canada risks today. Once that soul is pawned for any consideration, Canada must inevitably conform to the commercial, legal, financial, social and ethical standards which will be imposed on her by the sheer admitted weight of the United States." Kipling's appeal attracted much media attention in English Canada and was reprinted over the next week, in every English newspaper in Canada. Immigration In British Columbia, the Conservative Party ran on the slogan "A White Canada" by playing to the fears of British Columbians who resented the increasing presence of cheap Asian labour and the resulting depression in wages.Last Steps to Freedom by John Boyko pg.46 Results The campaign went badly for the Liberals, however. The powerful manufacturing interests of Toronto and Montreal switched their allegiance and financing to the Conservatives, who argued that free trade would undermine Canadian sovereignty and lead to a slow annexation of Canada by the US. In an editorial after Borden's victory, the Los Angeles Times wrote: "Their ballots have consigned to everlasting flames the bogy of annexation by the United States which Champ Clark called from the deeps. It was not really a wraith of anything that existed on this side of the line. It was a pumpkin scarehead with blazing eyes, a crooked slit for a nose, and a hideous grinning mouth which the fun-loving Champ placed upon a pole along with the Stars and Stripes, the while he carried terror to loyal Canuck hearts by his derisive shout of annexation."Allan, Chantal Bomb Canada: And Other Unkind Remarks in the American Media Athabsca: Athabasca University Press, 2009 page 29. Dow Grass of Deer Island was arrested for tampering with ballot boxes leading to the Sunbury—Queen's riding's invalidation of results."Found Some Queer Things: The Sunbury-Queen's Election was apparently very crooked, The Montreal Gazette · Sep 27, 1911 The election is often compared to the 1988 federal election, which was also fought over free trade, but the positions of the two parties were now reversed, with the Liberals against the Conservatives' trade proposals. The Conservatives dominated in Ontario, British Columbia and Manitoba. They also made significant gains in Quebec and Atlantic Canada, although the Liberals still won pluralities in both regions. The Liberals continued to dominate in Alberta and Saskatchewan, where free trade was extremely popular. Notably, this remains the most recent federal election where the Liberals would win the most seats in Alberta (although most Albertan Liberals supported the Borden-led Unionist government during the First World War). National results center|300px PartyParty leader# of candidatesSeatsPopular vote 1908 Elected Change # % Change CA PC rowConservative 1 Robert Borden 208 82 131 +59.8% 625,697 48.03% +3.08pp CA PC row Liberal-Conservative 2 3 1 -66.7% 6,842 0.53% -0.74pp CA Liberal row Liberal 2 Wilfrid Laurier 214 133 85 -36.1% 596,871 45.82% -3.05pp CA Independent row Independent Conservative 3 - 3   12,499 0.96% +0.50pp CA Labour row-name 3 1 1 - 12,101 0.93% +0.04pp CA Independent row Unknown 10 - - - 25,857 1.98% +0.83pp CA Independent row Independent 12 1 - -100% 10,346 0.79% -0.65pp CA Socialist row-name 6 - - - 4,574 0.35% -0.17pp CA PC row Nationalist Conservative 3 2 * - * 4,399 0.34% * CA Independent row Nationalist 1 * - * 3,533 0.27% * Total 461 220 221 +0.5% 1,302,719 100% Sources: http://www.elections.ca -- History of Federal Ridings since 1867 Notes: * Party did not nominate candidates in the previous election. 1 One Conservative candidate was acclaimed in Ontario. 2 One Liberal candidate was acclaimed in Ontario, and two Liberals were acclaimed in Quebec. Results by province Party name BC AB SK MB ON QCNB NS PE YK Total CA PC row Conservative Seats: 7 1 1 8 71 26 5 9 2 1 131 CA PC row Popular vote (%): 58.7 38.5 39.0 51.9 53.5 44.1 43.6 44.5 51.1 60.8 48.0 CA Liberal row Liberal Seats: - 6 9 2 13 36 8 9 2 - 85 CA Liberal row Vote (%): 37.7 53.3 59.4 44.8 41.2 44.6 47.7 55.2 48.9 39.2 45.8 CA Independent row Independent Conservative Seats:         1 2         3 CA Independent row Vote (%):         1.5 1.6         1.0 CA Labour row Labour Seats:         - 1         1 CA Labour row Vote (%):         0.1 3.6         0.9 CA PC row Liberal-Conservative Seats:   -     1           1 CA PC row Vote (%):   4.1     0.8           0.5 Total Seats 7 7 10 10 86 65 13 18 4 1 221 Parties that won no seats: CA Independent row Unknown Vote (%):   1.0     2.1 2.6 8.7       2.0 CA Independent row Independent Vote (%):   3.1 1.6 0.3 0.5 1.2   0.3     0.8 CA Socialist row-name Vote (%): 3.7     3.0 0.2 0.1         0.4 CA PC row Nationalist Conservative Vote (%):         0.3 1.0         0.3 CA Independent row Nationalist Vote (%):           1.1         0.3 Detailed analysis Synopsis of results + 1911 Canadian federal election – synopsis of riding results General Election (1908-10-26) https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/ElectionsRidings/Elections/Profile?election=1908-10-26 lop.parl.ca Library of Parliament May 1, 2025 General Election (1911-09-21) https://lop.parl.ca/sites/ParlInfo/default/en_CA/ElectionsRidings/Elections/Profile?election=1911-09-21 lop.parl.ca Library of Parliament May 1, 2025 Electoral district Winning partyVotesProvinceName1908 1stplace Votes Share Margin# Margin% 2ndplace Con Lib-Con Liberal-Conservative Ind-Con Independent Conservative Nat-Con Nationalist Conservative Lib Lab Soc Nat Nationalist Ind Independent or unknown Total  AB Calgary Con Con 7,671 58.15% 2,866 21.73% Lib 7,671 – – – 4,805 – – – 716 13,192AB Edmonton Lib Lib 7,070 56.76% 2,238 17.97% Con 4,832 – – – 7,070 – – – 555 12,457AB Macleod Lib-Con Lib 3,660 49.44% 819 11.06% Lib-Con – 2,841 – – 3,660 – – – 902 7,403AB Medicine Hat Con Lib 6,330 56.49% 1,455 12.99% Con 4,875 – – – 6,330 – – – – 11,205AB Red Deer Lib Lib 6,711 63.35% 2,829 26.71% Con 3,882 – – – 6,711 – – – – 10,593AB Strathcona Lib Lib 5,396 65.26% 2,524 30.53% Con 2,872 – – – 5,396 – – – – 8,268AB Victoria Lib Lib 3,225 48.53% 523 7.87% Con 2,702 – – – 3,225 – – – 719 6,646BC Comox—Atlin Lib Con 1,810 52.74% 188 5.48% Lib 1,810 – – – 1,622 – – – – 3,432BC Kootenay Con Con 4,113 57.51% 1,074 15.02% Lib 4,113 – – – 3,039 – – – – 7,152BC Nanaimo Lib Con 2,438 58.21% 688 16.43% Lib 2,438 – – – 1,750 – – – – 4,188BC New Westminster Con Con 3,542 65.70% 1,693 31.40% Lib 3,542 – – – 1,849 – – – – 5,391BC Vancouver City Con Con 6,902 58.72% 3,106 26.43% Lib 6,902 – – – 3,796 – 1,056 – – 11,754BC Victoria City Con Con 2,816 51.78% 484 8.90% Lib 2,816 – – – 2,332 – 290 – – 5,438BC Yale—Cariboo Con Con 3,851 63.56% 1,889 31.18% Lib 3,851 – – – 1,962 – 246 – – 6,059MB Brandon Lib Con 4,436 55.41% 866 10.82% Lib 4,436 – – – 3,570 – – – – 8,006MB Dauphin Con Lib 3,674 55.67% 748 11.33% Con 2,926 – – – 3,674 – – – – 6,600MB Lisgar Con Con 1,692 50.30% 20 0.59% Lib 1,692 – – – 1,672 – – – – 3,364MB Macdonald Con Con 2,956 51.40% 161 2.80% Lib 2,956 – – – 2,795 – – – – 5,751MB Marquette Con Con 3,409 50.94% 126 1.88% Lib 3,409 – – – 3,283 – – – – 6,692MB Portage la Prairie Con Con 3,267 55.76% 675 11.52% Lib 3,267 – – – 2,592 – – – – 5,859MB Provencher Lib Lib 3,049 53.33% 381 6.66% Con 2,668 – – – 3,049 – – – – 5,717MB Selkirk Con Con 3,098 48.84% 87 1.37% Lib 3,098 – – – 3,011 – – – 234 6,343MB Souris Con Con 3,150 50.51% 64 1.03% Lib 3,150 – – – 3,086 – – – – 6,236MB Winnipeg Con Con 12,754 55.15% 4,705 20.34% Lib 12,754 – – – 8,049 – 2,325 – – 23,128NB Carleton Lib Lib 2,614 50.11% 11 0.21% Con 2,603 – – – 2,614 – – – – 5,217NB Charlotte Lib Con 2,685 51.89% 196 3.79% Lib 2,685 – – – 2,489 – – – – 5,174NB Gloucester Lib Lib 3,172 59.27% 992 18.54% Con 2,180 – – – 3,172 – – – – 5,352NB Kent Lib Con 2,334 52.30% 205 4.59% Lib 2,334 – – – 2,129 – – – – 4,463NB King's and Albert Lib Con 3,734 52.33% 332 4.65% Lib 3,734 – – – 3,402 – – – – 7,136NB Northumberland Lib Lib 3,128 53.34% 392 6.68% Con 2,736 – – – 3,128 – – – – 5,864NB Restigouche Lib Lib 1,512 56.38% 342 12.75% Con 1,170 – – – 1,512 – – – – 2,682NB City and County of St. John Lib Con 5,491 50.51% 110 1.01% Lib 5,491William Pugsley and John Waterhouse Daniel swapped seats. – – – 5,381 – – – – 10,872NB City of St. John Con Lib 4,360 50.38% 65 0.75% Con 4,295 – – – 4,360 – – – – 8,655NB Sunbury—Queen's Lib Lib 2,020 50.12% 10 0.25% Con 2,010 – – – 2,020 – – – – 4,030NB Victoria Lib Lib 3,059 73.36% 1,948 46.71% Con 1,111 – – – 3,059 – – – – 4,170NB Westmorland Lib Lib 4,452 50.36% 64 0.72% Ind – – – – 4,452 – – – 4,388 8,840NB York Con Con 4,143 62.61% 1,669 25.22% Ind 4,143 – – – – – – – 2,474 6,617NS Annapolis Lib Con 2,131 50.15% 13 0.31% Lib 2,131 – – – 2,118 – – – – 4,249NS Antigonish Lib Lib 1,468 59.80% 481 19.59% Con 987 – – – 1,468 – – – – 2,455NS Cape Breton South Lib-Con Lib 5,069 49.42% 104 1.01% Lib – – – – 10,034James William Maddin previously campaigned as a Liberal-Conservative, but lost in 1911 as a Liberal. William F. Carroll was the winning Liberal candidate. – – – 223 10,257NS Colchester Con Con 2,847 56.38% 644 12.75% Lib 2,847 – – – 2,203 – – – – 5,050NS Cumberland Con Con 4,780 51.83% 338 3.67% Lib 4,780 – – – 4,442 – – – – 9,222NS Digby Con Con 2,126 53.26% 260 6.51% Lib 2,126 – – – 1,866 – – – – 3,992NS Guysborough Lib Lib 2,043 54.58% 343 9.16% Con 1,700 – – – 2,043 – – – – 3,743NS Halifax Con Con 13,827 50.00% 2 0.01% Lib 13,827 – – – 13,825 – – – – 27,652NS Hants Lib Con 2,191 51.00% 86 2.00% Lib 2,191 – – – 2,105 – – – – 4,296NS Inverness Lib Lib 2,928 58.84% 1,008 20.26% Con 1,920 – – – 2,928 – – – 128 4,976NS Kings Lib Con 2,474 51.57% 151 3.15% Lib 2,474 – – – 2,323 – – – – 4,797NS Lunenburg Lib Con 3,645 52.96% 408 5.93% Lib 3,645 – – – 3,237 – – – – 6,882NS North Cape Breton and Victoria Lib Lib 3,418 54.94% 615 9.89% Con 2,803 – – – 3,418 – – – – 6,221NS Pictou Lib Lib 4,221 51.74% 284 3.48% Con 3,937 – – – 4,221 – – – – 8,158NS Richmond Lib Lib 1,268 56.33% 285 12.66% Con 983 – – – 1,268 – – – – 2,251NS Shelburne and Queen's Lib Con 2,678 51.43% 149 2.86% Lib 2,678 – – – 2,529 – – – – 5,207NS Yarmouth Lib Lib 2,399 66.38% 1,184 32.76% Con 1,215 – – – 2,399 – – – – 3,614ON Algoma East Con Con 3,898 51.20% 182 2.39% Lib 3,898 – – – 3,716 – – – – 7,614ON Algoma West Con Con 2,738 55.67% 558 11.35% Lib 2,738 – – – 2,180 – – – – 4,918ON Brant Lib Con 1,795 51.86% 129 3.73% Lib 1,795 – – – 1,666 – – – – 3,461ON Brantford Lib Con 3,159 56.42% 719 12.84% Lib 3,159 – – – 2,440 – – – – 5,599ON Brockville Lib Con 2,251 51.26% 111 2.53% Lib 2,251 – – – 2,140 – – – – 4,391ON Bruce North Lib Con 2,526 50.82% 82 1.65% Lib 2,526 – – – 2,444 – – – – 4,970ON Bruce South Con Con 2,878 50.91% 103 1.82% Lib 2,878 – – – 2,775 – – – – 5,653ON Carleton Con Con 2,616 66.14% 1,277 32.29% Lib 2,616 – – – 1,339 – – – – 3,955ON Dufferin Con Con 2,496 70.65% 1,459 41.30% Lib 2,496 – – – 1,037 – – – – 3,533ON Dundas Con Con 2,262 58.30% 644 16.60% Lib 2,262 – – – 1,618 – – – – 3,880ON Durham Con Con 3,291 56.18% 724 12.36% Lib 3,291 – – – 2,567 – – – – 5,858ON Elgin East Con Con 2,313 54.66% 394 9.31% Lib 2,313 – – – 1,919 – – – – 4,232ON Elgin West Con Con 3,629 57.05% 897 14.10% Lib 3,629 – – – 2,732 – – – – 6,361ON Essex North Lib Con 3,616 51.25% 176 2.49% Lib 3,616 – – – 3,440 – – – – 7,056ON Essex South Lib Lib 2,946 51.77% 201 3.53% Con 2,745 – – – 2,946 – – – – 5,691ON Frontenac Con Con 2,629 59.68% 853 19.36% Lib 2,629 – – – 1,776 – – – – 4,405ON Glengarry Lib Lib 2,175 52.74% 226 5.48% Con 1,949 – – – 2,175 – – – – 4,124ON Grenville Con Con 2,286 62.48% 913 24.95% Ind 2,286 – – – – – – – 1,373Samuel John Martin campaigned as a Liberal in 1908. 3,659ON Grey East Con Con 2,560 63.44% 1,085 26.89% Lib 2,560 – – – 1,475 – – – – 4,035ON Grey North Con Con 3,326 52.79% 352 5.59% Lib 3,326 – – – 2,974 – – – – 6,300ON Grey South Lib Con 2,139 50.57% 48 1.13% Lib 2,139 – – – 2,091 – – – – 4,230ON Haldimand Con Con 2,817 56.85% 679 13.70% Lib 2,817 – – – 2,138 – – – – 4,955ON Halton Con Con 2,618 54.35% 419 8.70% Lib 2,618 – – – 2,199 – – – – 4,817ON Hamilton East Con Con 4,981 67.43% 2,575 34.86% Lib 4,981 – – – 2,406 – – – – 7,387ON Hamilton West Con Con 4,390 58.67% 1,820 24.33% Lib 4,390 – – – 2,570 – – – 522 7,482ON Hastings East Con Con 2,899 61.26% 1,066 22.53% Lib 2,899 – – – 1,833 – – – – 4,732ON Hastings West Con Con 3,623 66.17% 1,771 32.35% Lib 3,623 – – – 1,852 – – – – 5,475ON Huron East Con Con 2,020 52.58% 198 5.15% Lib 2,020 – – – 1,822 – – – – 3,842ON Huron South Lib Con 2,360 51.24% 114 2.48% Lib 2,360 – – – 2,246 – – – – 4,606ON Huron West Con Con 2,024 52.26% 175 4.52% Lib 2,024 – – – 1,849 – – – – 3,873ON Kent East Lib Lib 2,604 52.87% 283 5.75% Con 2,321 – – – 2,604 – – – – 4,925ON Kent West Lib Lib 3,671 50.45% 66 0.91% Con 3,605 – – – 3,671 – – – – 7,276ON Kingston Lib Con 2,322 54.01% 345 8.03% Lib 2,322 – – – 1,977 – – – – 4,299ON Lambton East Con Con 2,720 54.99% 494 9.99% Lib 2,720 – – – 2,226 – – – – 4,946ON Lambton West Lib Lib 3,139 50.72% 89 1.44% Con 3,050 – – – 3,139 – – – – 6,189ON Lanark North Con Con 1,613 53.78% 227 7.57% Lib 1,613 – – – 1,386 – – – – 2,999ON Lanark South Con Con 2,234 67.68% 1,167 35.35% Lib 2,234 – – – 1,067 – – – – 3,301ON Leeds Con Con 2,392 62.23% 940 24.45% Lib 2,392 – – – 1,452 – – – – 3,844ON Lennox and Addington Con Con 2,580 56.41% 586 12.81% Lib 2,580 – – – 1,994 – – – – 4,574ON Lincoln Con Con 4,576 60.22% 1,553 20.44% Lib 4,576 – – – 3,023 – – – – 7,599ON London Con Con 5,263 61.09% 1,911 22.18% Ind 5,263 – – – – – – – 3,352 8,615ON Middlesex East Con Con 2,477 57.70% 661 15.40% Lib 2,477 – – – 1,816 – – – – 4,293ON Middlesex North Lib Con 1,768 50.76% 53 1.52% Lib 1,768 – – – 1,715 – – – – 3,483ON Middlesex West Lib Lib 1,883 51.80% 131 3.60% Con 1,752 – – – 1,883 – – – – 3,635ON Muskoka Con Con 2,282 64.39% 1,020 28.78% Lib 2,282 – – – 1,262 – – – – 3,544ON Nipissing Con Con 5,872 52.43% 545 4.87% Lib 5,872 – – – 5,327 – – – – 11,199ON Norfolk Con Lib 3,179 50.95% 118 1.89% Con 3,061 – – – 3,179 – – – – 6,240ON Northumberland East Con Con 2,518 54.21% 391 8.42% Lib 2,518 – – – 2,127 – – – – 4,645ON Northumberland West Lib Con 1,426 50.11% 6 0.21% Lib 1,426 – – – 1,420 – – – – 2,846ON Ontario North Con Con 2,130 57.54% 558 15.07% Lib 2,130 – – – 1,572 – – – – 3,702ON Ontario South Lib Con 2,917 53.39% 370 6.77% Lib 2,917 – – – 2,547 – – – – 5,464ON Ottawa (City of) Lib Con 13,954 51.38% 1,048 3.86% Lib 13,954 – – – 12,906 – 298 – – 27,158ON Oxford North Lib Lib 2,898 52.68% 295 5.36% Con 2,603 – – – 2,898 – – – – 5,501ON Oxford South Lib Con 2,503 50.24% 24 0.48% Lib 2,503 – – – 2,479 – – – – 4,982ON Parry Sound Con Con 2,976 60.81% 1,058 21.62% Lib 2,976 – – – 1,918 – – – – 4,894ON Peel Con Con 2,656 53.16% 316 6.33% Lib 2,656 – – – 2,340 – – – – 4,996ON Perth North Lib Con 3,741 53.56% 497 7.12% Lib 3,741 – – – 3,244 – – – – 6,985ON Perth South Lib Con 2,303 50.91% 82 1.81% Lib 2,303 – – – 2,221 – – – – 4,524ON Peterborough East Con Con 1,992 58.74% 593 17.49% Lib 1,992 – – – 1,399 – – – – 3,391ON Peterborough West Lib Con 2,944 50.36% 42 0.72% Lib 2,944 – – – 2,902 – – – – 5,846ON Prescott Lib Lib 2,532 67.48% 1,312 34.97% Nat-Con – – – 1,220Eugène-Grégoire Quesnel campaigned as an Independent in 1908. 2,532 – – – – 3,752ON Prince Edward Lib Con 2,304 53.23% 280 6.47% Lib 2,304 – – – 2,024 – – – – 4,328ON Renfrew North Con Con 2,573 57.98% 708 15.95% Lib 2,573 – – – 1,865 – – – – 4,438ON Renfrew South Lib Lib 2,687 56.51% 619 13.02% Con 2,068 – – – 2,687 – – – – 4,755ON Russell Lib Lib 3,812 57.34% 976 14.68% Con 2,836 – – – 3,812 – – – – 6,648ON Simcoe East Lib Con 3,315 53.78% 466 7.56% Lib 3,315 – – – 2,849 – – – – 6,164ON Simcoe North Con Con 2,648 51.68% 172 3.36% Lib 2,648 – – – 2,476 – – – – 5,124ON Simcoe South Con Con 3,278 66.71% 1,642 33.41% Lib 3,278 – – – 1,636 – – – – 4,914ON Stormont Lib Con 2,539 51.32% 131 2.65% Lib 2,539 – – – 2,408 – – – – 4,947ON Thunder Bay and Rainy RiverElection had been postponed to October 12. Lib Con acclaimedON Toronto Centre Con Con 5,156 63.26% 2,162 26.53% Lib 5,156 – – – 2,994 – – – – 8,150ON Toronto East Ind Con 7,082 60.51% 4,801 41.02% Ind 7,082 – – – 1,878 463 – – 2,281 11,704ON Toronto North Con Con 6,474 67.22% 3,317 34.44% Lib 6,474 – – – 3,157 – – – – 9,631ON Toronto South Con Con 4,473 67.95% 2,363 35.90% Lib 4,473 – – – 2,110 – – – – 6,583ON Toronto West Con Con 11,442 76.90% 8,005 53.80% Lib 11,442 – – – 3,437 – – – – 14,879ON Victoria Lib-Con Lib-Con 4,001 59.65% 1,294 19.29% Ind – 4,001 – – – – – – 2,707 6,708ON Waterloo North Lib Con 3,774 52.18% 315 4.36% Lib 3,774 – – – 3,459 – – – – 7,233ON Waterloo South Con Con 3,492 56.96% 853 13.91% Lib 3,492 – – – 2,639 – – – – 6,131ON Welland Lib Lib acclaimedON Wellington North Lib Con 2,530 50.25% 25 0.50% Lib 2,530 – – – 2,505 – – – – 5,035ON Wellington South Lib Lib 3,368 55.10% 624 10.21% Con 2,744 – – – 3,368 – – – – 6,112ON Wentworth Lib Con 3,832 56.59% 893 13.19% Lib 3,832 – – – 2,939 – – – – 6,771ON York Centre Con Con 2,838 54.94% 510 9.87% Lib 2,838 – – – 2,328 – – – – 5,166ON York North Lib Con 2,730 50.55% 59 1.09% Lib 2,730 – – – 2,671 – – – – 5,401ON York South Ind-Con Ind-Con 7,194 79.10% 5,293 58.20% Ind – – 7,194 – – – – – 1,901 9,095PE King's Con Lib 2,538 50.14% 14 0.28% Con 2,524 – – – 2,538 – – – – 5,062PE Prince Lib Lib 3,529 50.83% 115 1.66% Con 3,414 – – – 3,529 – – – – 6,943PE Queen's Lib Con 8,700 52.31% 769 4.62% Lib 8,700 – – – 7,931 – – – – 16,631QC Argenteuil Con Con 1,824 59.78% 597 19.57% Lib 1,824 – – – 1,227 – – – – 3,051QC Bagot Lib Lib 1,845 51.32% 95 2.64% Con 1,750 – – – 1,845 – – – – 3,595QC Beauce Lib Lib 4,823 58.23% 1,364 16.47% Con 3,459 – – – 4,823Henri Sévérin Béland, incumbent in Beauce, campaigned in both Beauce (won) and Montmagny (lost). – – – – 8,282QC Beauharnois Lib Con 1,876 50.36% 27 0.72% Con 3,725Louis-Joseph Papineau, previously elected as a Liberal in 1908, was reelected as a Conservative in 1911. The other Conservative candidate, Joseph-Gédéon-Horace Bergeron, had been previously elected to the House of Commons. – – – – – – – – 3,725QC Bellechasse Lib Con 1,742 50.67% 46 1.34% Lib 1,742 – – – 1,696 – – – – 3,438QC Berthier Lib Con 1,638 45.09% 26 0.72% Lib 1,638 – – – 1,612 – – – 383 3,633QC Bonaventure Lib Lib 2,444 63.66% 1,049 27.32% Con 1,395 – – – 2,444 – – – – 3,839QC Brome Lib Con 1,520 50.40% 24 0.80% Lib 1,520 – – – 1,496 – – – – 3,016QC Chambly—Verchères Lib Con 2,712 51.29% 136 2.57% Lib 2,712 – – – 2,576 – – – – 5,288QC Champlain Con Con 3,811 52.53% 367 5.06% Lib 3,811 – – – 3,444 – – – – 7,255QC Charlevoix Con Con 2,020 59.80% 662 19.60% Lib 2,020Rodolphe Forget, incumbent in Charlevoix, campaigned and won in both Charlevoix and Montmorency. – – – 1,358 – – – – 3,378QC Châteauguay Lib Lib 1,281 50.79% 40 1.59% Con 1,241 – – – 1,281 – – – – 2,522QC Chicoutimi—Saguenay Con Ind-Con 3,798 38.59% 1,275 12.96% Lib – – 3,798 – 2,523 – – – 3,520 9,841QC Compton Lib Con 2,953 50.65% 76 1.30% Lib 2,953 – – – 2,877 – – – – 5,830QC Dorchester Lib Con 2,506 53.66% 342 7.32% Lib 2,506 – – – 2,164 – – – – 4,670QC Drummond—Arthabaska Lib Lib 3,800 51.82% 267 3.64% Nat – – – – 3,800 – – 3,533 – 7,333QC Gaspé Lib Con 2,470 56.52% 570 13.04% Lib 2,470 – – – 1,900Rodolphe Lemieux, incumbent in Gaspé, campaigned in Gaspé (lost) and Rouville (won). – – – – 4,370QC Hochelaga Lib Con 7,178 55.29% 1,373 10.58% Ind 7,178 – – – – – – – 5,805 12,983QC Huntingdon Lib Lib 1,318 52.93% 146 5.86% Con 1,172 – – – 1,318 – – – – 2,490QC Jacques Cartier Con Con 5,782 56.55% 1,340 13.11% Lib 5,782 – – – 4,442 – – – – 10,224QC Joliette Lib Con 2,239 50.75% 66 1.50% Lib 2,239 – – – 2,173 – – – – 4,412QC Kamouraska Lib Lib 1,840 51.20% 86 2.39% Con 1,754 – – – 1,840 – – – – 3,594QC L'Assomption Lib Lib 1,508 55.50% 299 11.00% Con 1,209 – – – 1,508 – – – – 2,717QC L'Islet Con Con 1,578 57.97% 434 15.94% Lib 1,578 – – – 1,144 – – – – 2,722QC Labelle Lib Con 2,902 50.73% 84 1.47% Lib 2,902 – – – 2,818 – – – – 5,720QC Laprairie—Napierville Lib Lib 1,795 52.47% 169 4.94% Con 1,626 – – – 1,795 – – – – 3,421QC Laval Lib Lib 2,648 51.95% 199 3.90% Con 2,449 – – – 2,648 – – – – 5,097QC Lévis Lib Lib 2,800 58.69% 829 17.38% Con 1,971 – – – 2,800 – – – – 4,771QC Lotbinière Lib Lib 1,870 55.16% 350 10.32% Con 1,520 – – – 1,870 – – – – 3,390QC Maisonneuve Labour Labour 11,538 55.24% 2,189 10.48% Con 9,349 – – – – 11,538 – – – 20,887QC Maskinongé Lib Ind-Con 1,507 51.88% 109 3.75% Lib – – 1,507 – 1,398 – – – – 2,905QC Mégantic Lib Lib 2,986 53.27% 367 6.55% Ind – – – – 2,986 – – – 2,619 5,605QC Missisquoi Lib Lib 2,002 52.66% 202 5.31% Con 1,800 – – – 2,002 – – – – 3,802QC Montcalm Lib Lib 1,432 51.03% 58 2.07% Con 1,374 – – – 1,432David Arthur Lafortune was originally elected as an Independent Liberal in a 1909 byelection. – – – – 2,806QC Montmagny Lib Con 1,653 55.45% 325 10.90% Lib 1,653 – – – 1,328 – – – – 2,981QC Montmorency Lib Con 1,359 51.26% 67 2.53% Lib 1,359 – – – 1,292 – – – – 2,651QC Nicolet Lib Con 2,805 50.76% 84 1.52% Lib 2,805 – – – 2,721 – – – – 5,526QC Pontiac Lib Con 2,059 44.59% 666 14.42% Lib 2,059 – – – 2,559George Frederick Hodgins, the Liberal incumbent, came in at 3rd place. – – – – 4,618QC Portneuf Lib Lib 2,868 57.67% 763 15.34% Con 2,105 – – – 2,868 – – – – 4,973QC Quebec County Lib Con 2,295 50.53% 48 1.06% Lib 2,295 – – – 2,247 – – – – 4,542QC Quebec East Lib Lib acclaimedQC Quebec West Con Lib 1,219 51.94% 91 3.88% Con 1,128 – – – 1,219 – – – – 2,347QC Quebec-Centre Lib Lib 2,122 58.12% 593 16.24% Con 1,529 – – – 2,122 – – – – 3,651QC Richelieu Lib Lib 2,373 59.15% 734 18.30% Con 1,639 – – – 2,373 – – – – 4,012QC Richmond—Wolfe Lib Lib 3,855 53.80% 544 7.59% Con 3,311 – – – 3,855 – – – – 7,166QC Rimouski Lib Con 4,179 52.73% 432 5.45% Lib 4,179 – – – 3,747 – – – – 7,926QC Rouville Lib Lib 1,467 55.23% 278 10.47% Con 1,189 – – – 1,467 – – – – 2,656QC Shefford Lib Lib 2,271 50.29% 26 0.58% Con 2,245 – – – 2,271 – – – – 4,516QC Town of Sherbrooke Con Lib 2,321 50.42% 39 0.85% Con 2,282 – – – 2,321 – – – – 4,603QC Soulanges Con Lib 1,045 53.64% 142 7.29% Con 903 – – – 1,045Wilfrid Laurier was also acclaimed in Quebec East. – – – – 1,948QC St. Anne Con Con 3,319 56.40% 753 12.80% Lib 3,319 – – – 2,566 – – – – 5,885QC St. Antoine Con Con 4,677 63.68% 2,009 27.35% Lib 4,677 – – – 2,668 – – – – 7,345QC St. Hyacinthe Lib Lib 2,295 51.57% 140 3.15% Con 2,155 – – – 2,295 – – – – 4,450QC St. James Lib Lib 4,653 59.41% 1,474 18.82% Nat-Con – – – 3,179 4,653 – – – – 7,832QC St. Johns—Iberville Lib Lib 2,638 78.35% 1,909 56.70% Con 729 – – – 2,638 – – – – 3,367QC St. Lawrence Lib Lib 4,469 54.18% 1,048 12.70% Con 3,421 – – – 4,469 – 359 – – 8,249QC St. Mary Lib Lib 5,089 62.82% 2,177 26.87% Con 2,912 – – – 5,089 100 – – – 8,101QC Stanstead Lib Lib 2,310 52.31% 204 4.62% Con 2,106 – – – 2,310 – – – – 4,416QC Témiscouata Lib Lib 2,913 51.89% 212 3.78% Con 2,701 – – – 2,913 – – – – 5,614QC Terrebonne Con Con 2,727 56.48% 626 12.97% Lib 2,727 – – – 2,101 – – – – 4,828QC Three Rivers and St. Maurice Lib Lib 3,155 50.07% 9 0.14% Con 3,146 – – – 3,155 – – – – 6,301QC Two Mountains Lib Lib acclaimedQC Vaudreuil Lib Lib 1,345 54.34% 215 8.69% Con 1,130 – – – 1,345 – – – – 2,475QC Wright Lib Lib 4,003 58.68% 1,184 17.36% Con 2,819 – – – 4,003 – – – – 6,822QC Yamaska Lib Con 1,870 51.28% 93 2.55% Lib 1,870 – – – 1,777 – – – – 3,647SK Assiniboia Lib Lib 5,804 61.86% 2,226 23.73% Con 3,578 – – – 5,804 – – – – 9,382SK Battleford Lib Lib 5,453 60.76% 1,931 21.52% Con 3,522 – – – 5,453 – – – – 8,975SK Humboldt Lib Lib 7,265 71.14% 4,318 42.28% Con 2,947 – – – 7,265 – – – – 10,212SK Mackenzie Lib Lib 4,090 70.17% 2,351 40.33% Con 1,739 – – – 4,090 – – – – 5,829SK Moose Jaw Lib Lib 8,285 58.19% 2,332 16.38% Con 5,953 – – – 8,285 – – – – 14,238SK Prince Albert Lib Con 3,316 52.83% 355 5.66% Lib 3,316 – – – 2,961 – – – – 6,277SK Qu'Appelle Con Lib 4,298 52.59% 424 5.19% Con 3,874 – – – 4,298 – – – – 8,172SK Regina Lib Lib 5,811 54.63% 1,730 16.26% Con 4,081 – – – 5,811 – – – 745 10,637SK Saltcoats Lib Lib 3,619 65.17% 1,685 30.34% Con 1,934 – – – 3,619 – – – – 5,553SK Saskatoon Lib Lib 5,328 54.70% 1,572 16.14% Con 3,756 – – – 5,328 – – – 656 9,740Terr Yukon Lib Con 1,285 60.79% 456 21.57% Lib 1,285 – – – 829 – – – – 2,114 a #B9E5B9 silver = open seat #DCDCDC silver = winning candidate was in previous House #EEBBBB silver = not incumbent; was previously elected as an MP #EABB94 silver = incumbent had switched allegiance #87CEFA silver = incumbency arose from byelection gain #FFFF00 silver = previously incumbent in another riding #DCD0FF silver = other incumbents renominated #7CFC00 silver = campaigned in two ridings #DDA0DD silver = Previously a member of one of the provincial/territorial legislatures #F0E68C silver = multiple candidates #ADD8E6 silver = two-member districts #FFE4E1 silver = overlapping districts #E0FFFF silver = election postponed to a later date + Results - multiple-member ridings Name MPs 1908 1911 Notes Halifax2 #9999FF 2 #9999FF 1#EA6D6A 1Robert Borden reelected; Alexander Kenneth Maclean won a seat for the Liberals. Ottawa (City of)2 #EA6D6A 2 #9999FF 2Harold McGiverin defeated; Albert Allard chose not to stand for reelection. Queen's2 #EA6D6A 2 #9999FF 2Both incumbents defeated. Comparative analysis for ridings (1911 vs 1908) + Summary of riding results by vote share for winning candidate and swing (vs 1908)Riding and winning partyVote shareShare won by winning candidate, with difference noted from share achieved by the same party in 1908.SwingPositive indicates improvement to standing of party winning in 1908; negative points to 2020's second-place party being swung to. % Change (pp) To Change (pp)  AB Calgary Con Hold 58.15 8.49 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 6.71 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)AB Edmonton Lib Hold 56.76 -7.53 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -5.31 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)AB Macleod Lib Gain 49.44 7.09 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -7.88 -1 1em background:CA LiberalAB Medicine Hat Lib Gain 56.49 9.70 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -9.70 -1 1em background:CA LiberalAB Red Deer Lib Hold 63.35 11.41 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 11.41 -1 1em background:CA LiberalAB Strathcona Lib Hold 65.26 15.12 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 6.84 -1 1em background:CA LiberalAB Victoria Lib Hold 48.53 -5.23 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 0.18 -1 1em background:CA LiberalBC Comox—Atlin Con Gain 52.74 acclamation in 1908BC Kootenay Con Hold 57.51 10.54 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 0.44 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)BC Nanaimo Con Gain 58.21 25.98 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -10.13 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)BC New Westminster Con Hold 65.70 7.21 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 7.21 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)BC Vancouver City Con Hold 58.72 16.61 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 6.00 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)BC Victoria City Con Hold 51.78 1.63 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.30 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)BC Yale—Cariboo Con Hold 63.56 10.42 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 8.64 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)MB Brandon Con Gain 55.41 6.59 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.89 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)MB Dauphin Lib Gain 55.67 7.42 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -7.42 -1 1em background:CA LiberalMB Lisgar Con Hold 50.30 -1.24 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -1.24 -1 1em background:CA LiberalMB Macdonald Con Hold 51.40 -3.93 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -3.93 -1 1em background:CA LiberalMB Marquette Con Hold 50.94 -3.81 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -3.81 -1 1em background:CA LiberalMB Portage la Prairie Con Hold 55.76 3.69 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 3.69 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)MB Provencher Lib Hold 53.33 -1.29 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -1.29 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)MB Selkirk Con Hold 48.84 -2.03 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -0.18 -1 1em background:CA LiberalMB Souris Con Hold 50.51 -7.16 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -7.16 -1 1em background:CA LiberalMB Winnipeg Con Hold 55.15 5.03 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.39 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB Carleton Lib Hold 50.11 -1.37 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -1.37 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB Charlotte Con Gain 51.89 3.82 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -3.82 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB Gloucester Lib Hold 59.27 4.06 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 4.06 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNB Kent Con Gain 52.30 10.40 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -10.40 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB King's and Albert Con Gain 52.33 4.93 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.93 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB Northumberland Lib Hold 53.34 -5.63 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -5.63 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB Restigouche Lib Hold 56.38 3.58 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 3.58 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNB City and County of St. John Con Gain 50.51 2.83 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.83 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB City of St. John Lib Gain 50.38 1.49 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -1.49 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNB Sunbury—Queen's Lib Hold 50.12 -0.55 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.55 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NB Victoria Lib Hold 73.36 -4.84 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 7.38 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNB Westmorland Lib Hold 50.36 -7.59 -1 1em background:NB Liberal N/A2nd place finisher in 1908 did not contest the 1911 election.NB York Con Hold 62.61 5.86 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) N/ANS Annapolis Con Gain 50.15 2.77 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Antigonish Lib Hold 59.80 9.41 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 9.41 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Cape Breton South Lib Gain 49.42 0.56 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -1.65 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Colchester Con Hold 56.38 5.30 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.30 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Cumberland Con Hold 51.83 -0.86 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -0.86 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Digby Con Hold 53.26 1.34 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.34 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Guysborough Lib Hold 54.58 1.88 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 1.88 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Halifax Con Hold 50.00 -2.61 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -2.61 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Hants Con Gain 51.00 2.60 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.60 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Inverness Lib Hold 58.84 -5.95 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -4.67 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Kings Con Gain 51.57 7.06 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -7.06 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Lunenburg Con Gain 52.96 4.43 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.43 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS North Cape Breton and Victoria Lib Hold 54.94 4.79 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 4.79 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Pictou Lib Hold 51.74 -0.04 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.04 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Richmond Lib Hold 56.33 1.15 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 1.15 -1 1em background:CA LiberalNS Shelburne and Queen's Con Gain 51.43 5.12 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.12 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)NS Yarmouth Lib Hold 66.38 5.14 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 5.14 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Algoma East Con Hold 51.20 0.83 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 0.83 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Algoma West Con Hold 55.67 3.03 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 3.03 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Brant Con Gain 51.86 5.52 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.52 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Brantford Con Gain 56.42 8.30 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -8.30 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Brockville Con Gain 51.26 3.00 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -3.00 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Bruce North Con Gain 50.82 N/AWinning party did not field a candidate inn 1908. Con -4.08 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Bruce South Con Hold 50.91 -0.75 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -0.75 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Carleton Con Hold 66.14 -1.14 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 6.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Dufferin Con Hold 70.65 -3.11 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -3.11 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Dundas Con Hold 58.30 2.76 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 2.76 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Durham Con Hold 56.18 1.12 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.12 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Elgin East Con Hold 54.66 1.77 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Elgin West Con Hold 57.05 2.73 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 2.73 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Essex North Con Gain 51.25 5.84 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.84 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Essex South Lib Hold 51.77 -4.31 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -4.31 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Frontenac Con Hold 59.68 4.47 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) N/AON Glengarry Lib Hold 52.74 -1.05 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -1.05 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Grenville Con Hold 62.48 4.78 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.78 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Grey East Con Hold 63.44 -2.09 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -2.09 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Grey North Con Hold 52.79 1.51 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.51 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Grey South Con Gain 50.57 1.55 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -1.55 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Haldimand Con Hold 56.85 4.41 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.41 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Halton Con Hold 54.35 2.06 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 2.06 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Hamilton East Con Hold 67.43 19.28 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 8.57 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Hamilton West Con Hold 58.67 5.56 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 9.05 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Hastings East Con Hold 61.26 -4.08 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -4.08 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Hastings West Con Hold 66.17 5.73 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.73 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Huron East Con Hold 52.58 1.61 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.61 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Huron South Con Gain 51.24 2.77 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Huron West Con Hold 52.26 1.52 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.52 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Kent East Lib Hold 52.87 -1.77 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -1.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Kent West Lib Hold 50.45 -0.09 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.09 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Kingston Con Gain 54.01 8.27 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -8.27 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Lambton East Con Hold 54.99 0.72 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 0.72 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Lambton West Lib Hold 50.72 -0.45 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.45 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Lanark North Con Hold 53.78 3.69 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 3.69 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Lanark South Con Hold 67.68 6.70 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 6.70 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Leeds Con Hold 62.23 0.03 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 0.03 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Lennox and Addington Con Hold 56.41 4.78 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.78 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Lincoln Con Hold 60.22 8.55 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 8.55 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON London Con Hold 61.09 3.11 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 3.11 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Middlesex East Con Hold 57.70 4.93 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.93 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Middlesex North Con Gain 50.76 1.63 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -1.63 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Middlesex West Lib Hold 51.80 1.64 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 1.64 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Muskoka Con Hold 64.39 4.90 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.90 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Nipissing Con Hold 52.43 2.31 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 2.31 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Norfolk Lib Gain 50.95 4.23 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -4.23 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Northumberland East Con Hold 54.21 2.12 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 2.12 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Northumberland West Con Gain 50.11 2.47 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.47 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Ontario North Con Hold 57.54 5.16 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.16 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Ontario South Con Gain 53.39 5.54 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.54 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Ottawa (City of) Con Gain 51.38 3.64 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.19 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Oxford North Lib Hold 52.68 1.49 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 1.49 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Oxford South Con Gain 50.24 1.11 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -1.11 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Parry Sound Con Hold 60.81 2.94 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 2.94 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Peel Con Hold 53.16 0.40 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 0.40 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Perth North Con Gain 53.56 3.85 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -3.85 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Perth South Con Gain 50.91 1.21 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -1.21 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Peterborough East Con Hold 58.74 3.23 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 3.23 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Peterborough West Con Gain 50.36 3.46 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -3.46 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Prescott Lib Hold 67.48 -2.77 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Nat-Con -2.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Prince Edward Con Gain 53.23 4.74 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.74 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Renfrew North Con Hold 57.98 1.15 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.15 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Renfrew South Lib Hold 56.51 -0.75 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.75 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Russell Lib Hold 57.34 -2.07 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -2.07 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Simcoe East Con Gain 53.78 5.79 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.79 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Simcoe North Con Hold 51.68 1.21 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.21 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Simcoe South Con Hold 66.71 -1.82 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -1.82 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Stormont Con Gain 51.32 11.26 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.77 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Thunder Bay and Rainy River Con Gain acclaimedON Toronto Centre Con Hold 63.26 11.88 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 11.88 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Toronto East Con Gain 60.51 15.95 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -25.95 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Toronto North Con Hold 67.22 14.91 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 14.91 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Toronto South Con Hold 67.95 6.27 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) N/AON Toronto West Con Hold 76.90 10.54 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) N/AON Victoria Lib-Con Hold 59.65 2.81 -1 1em background:NB Liberal-Conservative Lib-Con 4.35 -1 1em background:CA Liberal-ConservativeON Waterloo North Con Gain 52.18 4.50 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.13 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Waterloo South Con Hold 56.96 5.24 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.24 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Welland Lib Hold acclaimedON Wellington North Con Gain 50.25 1.05 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -1.05 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON Wellington South Lib Hold 55.10 0.13 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 0.13 -1 1em background:CA LiberalON Wentworth Con Gain 56.59 9.35 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -9.35 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON York Centre Con Hold 54.94 4.50 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.50 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON York North Con Gain 50.55 3.38 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -3.38 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)ON York South Ind-Con Hold 79.10 acclamation in 1908PE King's Lib Gain 50.14 1.90 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -1.90 -1 1em background:CA LiberalPE Prince Lib Hold 50.83 -0.36 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.36 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)PE Queen's Con Gain 52.31 2.99 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.99 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Argenteuil Con Hold 59.78 5.34 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.34 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Bagot Lib Hold 51.32 -3.53 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -3.53 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Beauce Lib Hold 58.23 -37.47 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -37.47 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Beauharnois Con Gain 50.36 0.76 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -25.58 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Bellechasse Con Gain 50.67 26.69 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -26.69 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Berthier Con Gain 45.09 -1.14 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.13 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Bonaventure Lib Hold 63.66 -4.09 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -4.09 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Brome Con Gain 50.40 8.52 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -7.89 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Chambly—Verchères Con Gain 51.29 11.24 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -11.24 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Champlain Con Hold 52.53 1.82 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 1.82 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Charlevoix Con Hold 59.80 6.94 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 6.94 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Châteauguay Lib Hold 50.79 -5.33 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -5.33 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Chicoutimi—Saguenay Ind-Con Gain 38.59 N/A Ind -11.61 -1 1em background:CA IndependentQC Compton Con Gain 50.65 3.96 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -3.96 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Dorchester Con Gain 53.66 5.70 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.70 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Drummond—Arthabaska Lib Hold 51.82 -4.43 -1 1em background:NB Liberal N/AQC Gaspé Con Gain 56.52 34.84 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -34.84 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Hochelaga Con Gain 55.29 6.30 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -28.66 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Huntingdon Lib Hold 52.93 1.33 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 1.33 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Jacques Cartier Con Hold 56.55 -0.10 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Lib -0.10 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Joliette Con Gain 50.75 4.74 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -4.74 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Kamouraska Lib Hold 51.20 -3.41 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -3.41 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC L'Assomption Lib Hold 55.50 -6.30 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -6.30 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC L'Islet Con Hold 57.97 4.72 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 4.72 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Labelle Con Gain 50.73 15.24 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -15.24 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Laprairie—Napierville Lib Hold 52.47 -3.08 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -3.08 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Laval Lib Hold 51.95 1.15 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 1.15 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Lévis Lib Hold 58.69 -4.00 -1 1em background:NB Liberal N/AQC Lotbinière Lib Hold 55.16 -6.07 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -6.07 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Maisonneuve Labour Hold 55.24 -16.23 -1 1em background:NB Labour N/AQC Maskinongé Ind-Con Gain 51.88 N/AHormidas Mayrand (Liberal) win in 1908 and lost in 1911 (both were two-way contests). Opponents in each election were of different affiliations.QC Mégantic Lib Hold 53.27 -0.94 -1 1em background:NB Liberal N/AQC Missisquoi Lib Hold 52.66 3.08 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 2.42 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Montcalm Lib Hold 51.03 -2.24 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -2.24 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Montmagny Con Gain 55.45 8.47 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -8.47 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Montmorency Con Gain 51.26 7.66 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -7.66 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Nicolet Con Gain 50.76 7.74 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -7.74 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Pontiac Con Gain 44.59 3.15 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -15.78 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Portneuf Lib Hold 57.67 0.70 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.78 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Quebec County Con Gain 50.53 N/ALiberal candidate won in 1908 but lost in 1911. There were also two Independent Liberal candidates in 1908, while the Conservatives fielded a candidate only in 1911.QC Quebec East Lib Hold acclaimedQC Quebec West Lib Gain 51.94 2.18 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -2.18 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Quebec-Centre Lib Hold 58.12 -6.23 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -6.23 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Richelieu Lib Hold 59.15 -3.88 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -3.88 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Richmond—Wolfe Lib Hold 53.80 -2.18 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -2.18 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Rimouski Con Gain 52.73 7.00 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -7.00 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Rouville Lib Hold 55.23 acclamation in 1908QC Shefford Lib Hold 50.29 -3.03 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -3.03 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Town of Sherbrooke Lib Gain 50.42 2.18 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -2.18 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Soulanges Lib Gain 53.64 5.09 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -5.09 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC St. Anne Con Hold 56.40 5.78 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.78 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC St. Antoine Con Hold 63.68 6.74 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 6.74 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC St. Hyacinthe Lib Hold 51.57 -5.23 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -5.23 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC St. James Lib Hold 59.41 -2.40 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Nat-Con -2.40 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC St. Johns—Iberville Lib Hold 78.35 -16.51 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -16.51 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC St. Lawrence Lib Hold 54.18 -0.98 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -0.24 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC St. Mary Lib Hold 62.82 5.79 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 6.40 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Stanstead Lib Hold 52.31 0.40 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 0.40 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Témiscouata Lib Hold 51.89 -4.28 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -4.28 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Terrebonne Con Hold 56.48 5.71 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con 5.71 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Three Rivers and St. Maurice Lib Hold 50.07 -13.83 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -13.83 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Two Mountains Lib Hold acclaimedQC Vaudreuil Lib Hold 54.34 -13.91 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -13.91 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)QC Wright Lib Hold 58.68 3.13 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 3.13 -1 1em background:CA LiberalQC Yamaska Con Gain 51.28 2.50 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -2.50 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)SK Assiniboia Lib Hold 61.86 8.53 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 8.53 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Battleford Lib Hold 60.76 0.34 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 0.34 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Humboldt Lib Hold 71.14 8.98 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 8.98 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Mackenzie Lib Hold 70.17 4.50 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 4.50 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Moose Jaw Lib Hold 58.19 0.20 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 0.20 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Prince Albert Con Gain 52.83 6.09 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) Con -5.16 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)SK Qu'Appelle Lib Gain 52.59 2.94 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib -2.94 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Regina Lib Hold 54.63 -0.21 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 3.29 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Saltcoats Lib Hold 65.17 11.66 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Lib 7.97 -1 1em background:CA LiberalSK Saskatoon Lib Hold 54.70 -8.00 -1 1em background:NB Liberal Con -4.63 -1 1em background:CA Conservative (historical)Terr Yukon Con Gain 60.79 50.03 -1 1em background:NB Conservative (historical) N/A a See also Canada Politics List of Canadian federal general elections List of political parties in Canada 11th Canadian Parliament 1988 Canadian federal election (Canada-US relations elections) 2025 Canadian federal election (Canada-US relations elections) Notes References Argyle, Ray. Turning Points : The Campaigns that Changed Canada : 2004 and before (2004) online pp. 117–154. Brown, Robert Craig. Robert Laird Borden: A Biography (1975), the major scholarly biography Brown, Robert Craig, and Ramsay Cook. Canada: 1896–1921 (1974) Dafoe John W. Clifford Sifton in Relation to His Times. Toronto, 1931. Dafoe John W. Laurier: a Study in Canadian Politics. Toronto, 1922. Dutil Patrice A. MacKenzie David Canada 1911: The Decisive Election that Shaped the Country 2011 Dundurn Toronto 978-1-55488-947-1 https://archive.org/details/canada1911decisi0000duti registration Ellis, L. Ethan. Reciprocity, 1911: A Study in Canadian-American Relations (1939) online https://web.archive.org/web/20051101230704/http://www.questia.com:80/PM.qst;jsessionid=DLf1BTLcvpYQg2vGTR2pQ8mdFhp591l6xWZHvM2ncswggmtLKnnD!1400983345?a=o&d=94573370 November 1, 2005 Hopkins J. Castell The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs, 1911 1912 The Annual Review Publishing Company Toronto https://archive.org/details/canadianannualre1911unse 10.1017/S0008423900034004 Reciprocity, Imperial Sentiment, and Party Politics in the 1911 Election 1980 Johnston Richard Percy Michael B. Canadian Journal of Political Science 13 4 711–729 154189040 10.2307/j.ctt1w1vn9k Laurier and a Liberal Quebec 1973 Neatby H. Blair 9780773595354 Richard T Clippingdale 10.2307/138903 138903 Robert Borden and the Election of 1911 1959 MacQuarrie Heath The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 25 3 271–286 Porritt Edward. Sixty Years of Protection in Canada, 1846–1907: Where Industry Leans on the Politicians. (London, 1908) online 10.1017/S0018246X03003522 The Imperial Significance of the Canadian–American Reciprocity Proposals of 1911 2004 Potter Simon J. The Historical Journal 47 81–100 159586052 Stevens, Paul D. The 1911 General Election: A Study in Canadian Politics (Toronto: Copp Clark, 1970) Primary sources Borden, Robert. Robert Laird Borden: His Memoirs edited and with an introduction by Henry Borden Harpell, James J., Canadian National Economy: the Cause of High Prices and Their Effect upon the Country. Toronto, 1911. Notes See also 12th Canadian Parliament Further reading Foley James G. Return of the Twelfth General Election for the House of Commons, 1911. 1912 King's Printer Ottawa https://archive.org/details/1912v46i11p18_0838 Category:1911 elections in Canada 1911 Category:September 1911 in Canada Category:Anti-American sentiment in Canada