1929 Ontario general election

Canadian provincial election September 2023 1929 Ontario general election Ontario 1921 parliamentary no no no 1926 Ontario general election 1926 17th Legislative Assembly of Ontario 1934 Ontario general election 1934 112 seats in the 18th Legislative Assembly of Ontario 57 seats were needed for a majority October 30, 1929 150x150px ON Conservative nohash George Howard Ferguson December 2, 1920 ON Conservative name Grenville 72 90 18 56.7% 1.3pp LIB ON Liberal nohash W.E.N. Sinclair 1923 ON Liberal name Ontario South 15 13 2 32.2% 15.0pp ON Progressive nohash John Giles Lethbridge 1927 CA Progressive name Middlesex West (lost re-election) 10 4 6 3.4% 2.9pp ON United Farmers nohash Leslie Oke - ON United Farmers name Lambton East (lost re-election) 3 1 2 1.3% - Premier Premier after election G. Howard Ferguson ON Conservative name G. Howard Ferguson ON Conservative name elected members The 1929 Ontario general election was the 18th general election held in the province of Ontario, Canada. It was held on October 30, 1929, to elect the 112 Members of the 18th Legislative Assembly of Ontario ("MLAs").1929 General Election https://results.elections.on.ca/en/data-explorer?fromYear=1867&toYear=2021&electionId=219&levelOfDetail=election Elections Ontario January 3, 2021 Campaign Every party, including the Ontario Prohibition Union and the English Language School League, issued their own manifesto during the campaign, to the extent that the Press called it the "battle of the manifestos".Canadian Annual Review 1930 358 The Liberals continued to use their strategy from the previous election of coordinating their efforts with other pro-temperance forces in order to minimize vote splits. Only the Conservatives fielded candidates in all ridings, and eight of them were returned by acclamation. In 21 two-way contests, the Liberals declined to field a candidate in favour of an ally considered more likely to gain votes. There were only 16 three-cornered races and 2 four-way battles. + Riding contests, by number of candidates (1929) CandidatesConLibProgL-PUFOLabI-ConCommIndProhTotal18 8286 65 4 4 2 2 3 6 172316 16 5 1 1 2 4 1 2 4842 2 2 1 1 8Total112 83 9 4 3 3 7 5 2 8 236 Outcome The Ontario Conservative Party, led by George Howard Ferguson, was elected for a third consecutive term in government with an increased majority in the Legislature. The Ontario Liberal Party, led by W.E.N. Sinclair, lost one seat, but continued to form the official opposition. Conservative gains came at the expense of the Progressive Party and the United Farmers of Ontario. Earl Hutchinson of Kenora is the sole Labour MLA elected. Results Elections to the 18th Parliament of Ontario (1929) |- ! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party ! rowspan=2 | Party leader ! colspan=5 | MPPs ! colspan=3 | Votes |- ! Candidates !1926 !Dissol. !1929 !± !# !% ! ± (pp) ON Conservative row-name |style="text-align:left;"|Howard Ferguson |112 |73 |72 |90 |17 |574,730 |56.66% |0.79 ON Liberal row-name |style="text-align:left;"|W.E.N. Sinclair |83 |13 |14 |11 |2 |319,487 |31.50% |14.33 ON Progressive row-name |style="text-align:left;"|William Raney |9 |10 |8 |4 |6 |30,795 |3.04% |3.26 ON Liberal-Progressive row-name | |4 |5 |4 |3 |2 |17,966 |1.77% |2.47 ON United Farmers row-name |style="text-align:left;"|Leslie Oke |3 |3 |3 |1 |2 |12,752 |1.26% |0.08 ON Labour row-name | |3 |1 |1 |1 | |8,664 |0.85% |0.44 ON Independent Conservative row-name |style="text-align:left;"| |7 |1 |2 |2 |1 |21,950 |2.16% |0.40 ON Independent Liberal row-name |style="text-align:left;"| |– |4 |3 |– |4 |colspan="3" style="text-align:center;"|Did not campaign ON Independent Progressive row-name |style="text-align:left;"| |– |1 |1 |– |1 |colspan="3" style="text-align:center;"|Did not campaign ON Liberal row |style="text-align:left;"|Liberal-Prohibitionist |style="text-align:left;"| |– |1 |1 |– |1 |colspan="3" style="text-align:center;"|Did not campaign ON Prohibitionist row-name |style="text-align:left;"| |8 |– |– |– |– |25,807 |2.54% |5.52 ON Communist row-name |style="text-align:left;"| |5 |– |– |– |– |1,542 |0.15% |New ON Independent row-name |style="text-align:left;"| |2 |– |– |– | |587 |0.06% |New ON Liberal row |style="text-align:left;"|Liberal-Labour |style="text-align:left;"| |– |– |– |– | |colspan="3" style="text-align:center;"|Did not campaign ON Progressive row |style="text-align:left;"|Progressive-Liberal |style="text-align:left;"| |– |– |– |– | |colspan="3" style="text-align:center;"|Did not campaign ON Liberal row |style="text-align:left;"|Liberal-Labour-Prohibitionist |style="text-align:left;"| |– |– |– |– | |colspan="3" style="text-align:center;"|Did not campaign ON Vacant row-name |colspan="3"| |3 |colspan="5"| |-style="background:#E9E9E9;" |colspan="3" style="text-align:left;"|Total |236 |112 |112 |112 | |1,014,310 |100.00% | |- |colspan="8" style="text-align:left;"|Blank and invalid ballots |align="right"|7,720 |style="background:#E9E9E9;" colspan="2"| |-style="background:#E9E9E9;" |colspan="8" style="text-align:left;"|Registered voters / turnout |1,804,932 |56.62% |7.33 |} Vote and seat summaries Ternary plots - shift of electoral support (1926-1929) 350 200 yes center Electoral districts identified by colours of winning parties File:Ternary ON1926.svg 1926 Ternary plot of 1926 results File:Ternary ON1929.svg 1929 Ternary plot of 1929 results + Seats and popular vote by party Party Seats Votes Change (pp) ON Conservative colour&name 90 112 ON Conservative 175 56.66 175 darkgrey 0.79 -5 1em background:green ON Liberal colour&name 11 112 ON Liberal 175 31.50 175 darkgrey 14.33 -5 1em background:green ON Progressive colour&name 4 112 ON Progressive 175 3.04 175 darkgrey -3.26 -5 1em background:red ON Liberal-Progressive colour&name 3 112 ON Liberal-Progressive 175 1.77 175 darkgrey -2.47 -5 1em background:red ON United Farmers colour&name 1 112 ON United Farmers 175 1.26 175 darkgrey -0.08 -5 1em background:red ON Labour colour&name 1 112 ON Labour 175 0.85 175 darkgrey -0.44 -5 1em background:red ON Independent-Conservative colour&name 2 112 ON Independent 175 2.16 175 darkgrey 0.40 -5 1em background:green ON Prohibitionist colour&name 0 112 ON Prohibitionist 175 2.54 175 darkgrey -5.52 -5 1em background:red ON Other colour&name 0 112 ON Independent 175 0.22 175 darkgrey -3.75 -5 1em background:red Synopsis of results + Results by riding - 1929 Ontario general election Riding Winning party Turnoutincluding spoilt ballots Votes#Name 1926Party Votes Share Margin#Margin% Con Lib Prog Progressive Proh Prohibitionist I-Con Independent-Conservative L-Prog Liberal-Progressive UFO Labour Comm Communist Ind Independent Total   001 Addington Con Con 4,273 67.47% 2,213 34.94% 61.09% 4,273 2,060 – – – – – – – – 6,333 002 Algoma Con Con 4,565 67.49% 2,366 34.98% 63.45% 4,565 2,199 – – – – – – – – 6,764 003 Brant County Prog Prog 3,831 53.42% 490 6.83% 71.65% 3,341 – 3,831 – – – – – – – 7,172 004 Brantford Con Con 7,740 57.93% 2,119 15.86% 65.98% 7,740 5,621 – – – – – – – – 13,361 005 Brockville Con Con 4,633 60.73% 1,637 21.46% 61.22% 4,633 2,996 – – – – – – – – 7,629 006 Bruce North Lib Lib 4,520 52.09% 362 4.17% 70.52% 4,158 4,520 – – – – – – – – 8,678 007 Bruce South Prog Lib 4,983 53.04% 571 6.08% 69.43% 4,412 4,983 – – – – – – – – 9,395 008 Carleton Con Con 3,781 67.16% 1,932 34.32% 47.76% 3,781 – – 1,849 – – – – – – 5,630 009 Cochrane North Con Con 3,121 43.60% 587 8.20% 63.76% 3,121 1,298 – – 2,534 – – – – 205 7,158 010 Cochrane South Con Con 5,686 52.76% 594 5.51% 57.02% 5,686 5,092 – – – – – – – – 10,778 011 Dufferin Prog Prog 3,778 50.30% 45 0.60% 76.42% 3,733 – 3,778 – – – – – – – 7,511 012 Dundas L-Proh Con 3,362 44.31% 999 13.17% 73.23% 3,362 1,862 – 2,363 – – – – – – 7,587 013 Durham Lib Lib 5,860 50.04% 10 0.09% 71.73% 5,850 5,860 – – – – – – – – 11,710 014 Elgin East Lib Con 4,068 51.83% 288 3.67% 76.56% 4,068 3,780 – – – – – – – – 7,848 015 Elgin West Con Con 6,579 56.17% 1,445 12.34% 63.29% 6,579 5,134 – – – – – – – – 11,713 016 Essex North Con Con 8,043 55.97% 1,715 11.93% 63.61% 8,043 6,328 – – – – – – – – 14,371 017 Essex South Lib Con 4,548 53.09% 529 6.17% 65.84% 4,548 4,019 – – – – – – – – 8,567 018 Fort William Con Con 5,467 58.73% 1,626 17.47% 62.52% 5,467 3,841 – – – – – – – – 9,308 019 Frontenac—Lennox Lib Con 4,419 54.77% 769 9.53% 66.19% 4,419 3,650 – – – – – – – – 8,069 020 Glengarry Con Lib 3,290 50.34% 45 0.69% 61.20% 3,245 3,290 – – – – – – – – 6,535 021 Grenville Con Con 4,452 64.81% 2,035 29.63% 65.93% 4,452 – – 2,417 – – – – – – 6,869 022 Grey North Prog Prog 6,912 52.15% 571 4.31% 68.85% 6,341 – 6,912 – – – – – – – 13,253 023 Grey South UFO UFO 6,607 53.07% 764 6.14% 71.06% 5,843 – – – – – 6,607 – – – 12,450 024 Haldimand Lib Con 4,993 50.14% 28 0.28% 74.85% 4,993 4,965 – – – – – – – – 9,958 025 Halton Con L-Prog 5,696 50.32% 72 0.64% 68.70% 5,624 – – – – 5,696 – – – – 11,320 026 Hamilton Centre Con Con 7,568 75.54% 5,117 51.07% 46.44% 7,568 2,451 – – – – – – – – 10,019 027 Hamilton East Con Con 8,287 62.64% 3,818 28.86% 53.20% 8,287 4,469 – – – – – – 473 – 13,229 028 Hamilton West Con Con 6,974 75.93% 4,763 51.86% 51.54% 6,974 2,211 – – – – – – – – 9,185 029 Hastings East Con Con acclaimed 030 Hastings North Con Con acclaimed 031 Hastings West Con Con 5,304 66.20% 2,596 32.40% 56.13% 5,304 2,708 – – – – – – – – 8,012 032 Huron North Lib Lib 5,795 57.18% 1,455 14.36% 69.69% 4,340 5,795 – – – – – – – – 10,135 033 Huron South Prog Prog 4,785 50.17% 32 0.34% 66.20% 4,753 – 4,785 – – – – – – – 9,538 034 Kent East Prog Con 3,157 38.56% 435 5.31% 69.32% 3,157 2,722 2,309 – – – – – – – 8,188 035 Kent West Con Con 6,911 50.81% 221 1.62% 58.71% 6,911 6,690 – – – – – – – – 13,601 036 Kenora Con Lab 3,528 53.04% 404 6.07% 68.32% 3,124 – – – – – – 3,528 – – 6,652 037 Kingston Con Con acclaimed 038 Lambton East UFO Con 4,632 43.93% 775 7.35% 68.67% 4,632 2,056 – – – – 3,857 – – – 10,545 039 Lambton West Con Con 5,724 54.97% 1,035 9.94% 61.88% 5,724 4,689 – – – – – – – – 10,413 040 Lanark North Con Con 4,038 56.64% 947 13.28% 73.69% 4,038 3,091 – – – – – – – – 7,129 041 Lanark South Con Con 4,308 57.40% 1,111 14.80% 67.06% 4,308 3,197 – – – – – – – – 7,505 042 Leeds Con Con 3,755 49.27% 1,550 20.34% 73.69% 3,755 2,205 – 1,661 – – – – – – 7,621 043 Lincoln Prog Con 3,557 43.42% 668 8.15% 71.09% 3,557 2,889 1,746 – – – – – – – 8,192 044 London North Con Con 6,221 68.04% 3,299 36.08% 47.12% 6,221 – – 2,922 – – – – – – 9,143 045 London South Con Con 6,801 58.48% 1,972 16.96% 52.76% 6,801 – – – – – – 4,829 – – 11,630 046 Manitoulin UFO Con 2,291 50.03% 3 0.07% 74.57% 2,291 – – – – – 2,288 – – – 4,579 047 Middlesex North I-Prog Con 5,288 50.80% 167 1.60% 70.40% 5,288 5,121 – – – – – – – – 10,409 048 Middlesex West Prog Con 3,371 34.81% 186 1.92% 72.71% 3,371 3,129 3,185 – – – – – – – 9,685 049 Muskoka Con Con acclaimed 050 Niagara Falls Con Con 6,713 64.94% 3,088 29.87% 45.50% 6,713 3,625 – – – – – – – – 10,338 051 Nipissing Con Con 4,859 57.99% 1,339 15.98% 62.41% 4,859 3,520 – – – – – – – – 8,379 052 Norfolk Con Con 7,206 55.39% 1,403 10.78% 78.42% 7,206 5,803 – – – – – – – – 13,009 053 Northumberland Lib Con 7,108 52.52% 683 5.05% 70.09% 7,108 6,425 – – – – – – – – 13,533 054 Ontario North Prog Con 3,072 47.33% 876 13.50% 71.69% 3,072 1,222 2,196 – – – – – – – 6,490 055 Ontario South Lib Lib 9,791 53.80% 1,383 7.60% 65.35% 8,408 9,791 – – – – – – – – 18,199 056 Ottawa East I-Lib Con 7,813 57.72% 2,089 15.43% 50.47% 7,813 5,724 – – – – – – – – 13,537 057 Ottawa North Con Con 5,198 67.64% 2,711 35.28% 29.30% 5,198 2,487 – – – – – – – – 7,685 058 Ottawa South Con Con acclaimed 059 Oxford North L-Prog L-Prog 5,449 50.47% 102 0.94% 70.82% 5,347 – – – – 5,449 – – – – 10,796 060 Oxford South L-Prog Lib 5,217 52.49% 495 4.98% 72.03% 4,722 5,217 – – – – – – – – 9,939 061 Parry Sound Con Con 4,507 56.48% 1,034 12.96% 61.37% 4,507 3,473 – – – – – – – – 7,980 062 Peel Con Con 6,737 54.27% 1,060 8.54% 69.65% 6,737 5,677 – – – – – – – – 12,414 063 Perth North Con Con 7,273 53.04% 834 6.08% 66.36% 7,273 6,439 – – – – – – – – 13,712 064 Perth South Lib Con 3,428 44.73% 1,246 16.26% 71.07% 3,428 2,182 2,053 – – – – – – – 7,663 065 Peterborough City Con Con 5,931 51.97% 450 3.94% 69.89% 5,931 5,481 – – – – – – – – 11,412 066 Peterborough County Lib Con 3,117 50.23% 29 0.47% 70.71% 3,117 3,088 – – – – – – – – 6,205 067 Port Arthur Con Con acclaimed 068 Prescott I-Lib I-Con 3,996 43.15% 968 10.45% 76.93% 3,028 2,236 – – 3,996 – – – – – 9,260 069 Prince Edward Prog Con 4,457 53.72% 617 7.44% 80.37% 4,457 – – 3,840 – – – – – – 8,297 070 Rainy River Con I-Con 3,142 51.96% 237 3.92% 78.05% 2,905 – – – 3,142 – – – – – 6,047 071 Renfrew North Con Con acclaimed 072 Renfrew South Con Lib 4,990 50.44% 87 0.88% 67.43% 4,903 4,990 – – – – – – – – 9,893 073 Russell I-Lib Con 6,190 51.20% 291 2.41% 65.03% 6,190 5,899 – – – – – – – – 12,089 074 St. Catharines I-Con Con 5,562 53.99% 822 7.98% 49.54% 5,562 – – – 4,740 – – – – – 10,302 075 Sault Ste. Marie Con Con 6,216 77.52% 4,413 55.03% 51.55% 6,216 1,803 – – – – – – – – 8,019 076 Simcoe Centre Con Lib 5,199 51.08% 220 2.16% 77.06% 4,979 5,199 – – – – – – – – 10,178 077 Simcoe East Con Con 7,980 61.63% 3,011 23.25% 70.75% 7,980 4,969 – – – – – – – – 12,949 078 Simcoe Southwest L-Prog Con 6,213 54.44% 1,013 8.88% 69.56% 6,213 5,200 – – – – – – – – 11,413 079 Stormont Con Con 6,546 76.82% 4,571 53.64% 52.29% 6,546 – – – 1,975 – – – – – 8,521 080 Sturgeon Falls I-Lib Con 3,051 58.92% 924 17.84% 67.64% 3,051 2,127 – – – – – – – – 5,178 081 Sudbury Con Con acclaimed 082 Temiskaming Con Con 4,888 58.21% 1,379 16.42% 62.70% 4,888 3,509 – – – – – – – – 8,397 083 Victoria North L-Prog L-Prog 3,139 50.25% 31 0.50% 72.72% 3,108 – – – – 3,139 – – – – 6,247 084 Victoria South L-Prog Con 4,607 55.38% 895 10.76% 72.91% 4,607 – – – – 3,712 – – – – 8,319 085 Waterloo North Con Lib 6,080 36.92% 395 2.40% 56.76% 5,685 6,080 – – 4,704 – – – – – 16,469 086 Waterloo South Lab Con 7,707 55.77% 1,595 11.54% 62.88% 7,707 6,112 – – – – – – – – 13,819 087 Welland Con Con 6,663 71.54% 4,012 43.07% 52.08% 6,663 2,651 – – – – – – – – 9,314 088 Wellington Northeast Lib Lib 6,288 63.95% 2,744 27.91% 71.75% 3,544 6,288 – – – – – – – – 9,832 089 Wellington South Con Con 7,554 55.39% 1,471 10.79% 67.84% 7,554 – – 6,083 – – – – – – 13,637 090 Wentworth North Con Con 4,750 56.31% 1,372 16.27% 31.83% 4,750 3,378 – – – – – 307 – – 8,435 091 Wentworth South Con Con 8,460 71.59% 5,102 43.17% 51.49% 8,460 3,358 – – – – – – – – 11,818 092 Windsor East Con Con 6,224 65.25% 3,247 34.84% 36.98% 6,224 2,977 – – – – – – 337 – 9,538 093 Windsor West Con Con 6,419 64.11% 2,825 38.94% 37.71% 6,419 3,594 – – – – – – – – 10,013 094 Beaches Con Con 8,034 75.55% 5,434 51.10% 40.40% 8,034 2,600 – – – – – – – – 10,634 095 Woodbine Con Con 6,839 79.56% 5,082 59.12% 35.55% 6,839 1,757 – – – – – – – – 8,596 096 Greenwood Con Con 5,783 79.04% 4,249 58.07% 35.97% 5,783 1,534 – – – – – – – – 7,317 097 Riverdale Con Con 5,604 72.70% 3,500 45.41% 36.98% 5,604 2,104 – – – – – – – – 7,708 098 Eglinton Con Con 10,009 59.30% 3,140 18.60% 47.39% 10,009 6,869 – – – – – – – – 16,878 099 St. David Con Con 7,199 74.60% 4,748 49.20% 36.97% 7,199 2,451 – – – – – – – – 9,650 100 St. George Con Con 6,450 68.76% 3,520 37.53% 33.04% 6,450 2,930 – – – – – – – – 9,380 101 St. Patrick Con Con 4,473 66.77% 3,231 48.23% 46.22% 4,473 1,242 – – 859 – – – 125 – 6,699 102 St. Andrews Con Con 3,436 63.64% 1,473 27.28% 37.71% 3,436 1,963 – – – – – – – – 5,399 103 Bellwoods Con Con 5,114 74.40% 3,749 54.54% 35.11% 5,114 1,365 – – – – – – 395 – 6,874 104 Bracondale Con Con 7,108 70.54% 4,352 43.19% 42.79% 7,108 2,756 – – – – – – 212 – 10,076 105 Dovercourt Con Con 4,316 66.94% 2,184 33.87% 43.98% 4,316 2,132 – – – – – – – – 6,448 106 Brockton Con Con 8,731 71.06% 5,176 42.13% 40.42% 8,731 3,555 – – – – – – – – 12,286 107 Parkdale Con Con 6,203 70.48% 3,987 45.30% 45.52% 6,203 2,216 – – – – – – – 382 8,801 108 High Park Con Con 8,447 64.39% 3,775 28.78% 48.30% 8,447 – – 4,672 – – – – – – 13,119 109 York East Con Con 9,619 64.42% 4,307 28.85% 42.86% 9,619 5,312 – – – – – – – – 14,931 110 York North Lib Con 5,448 50.91% 195 1.82% 75.67% 5,448 5,253 – – – – – – – – 10,701 111 York South Con Con 7,862 68.64% 4,270 37.28% 36.85% 7,862 3,592 – – – – – – – – 11,454 112 York West Con Con 8,296 65.29% 3,885 30.57% 44.67% 8,296 4,411 – – – – – – – – 12,707 a #F5F5DC silver = turnout is above provincial average #DCDCDC silver = incumbent re-elected under the same party banner #EABB94 silver = incumbent switched allegiance for the election #87CEFA silver = incumbency arose from byelection gain #DCD0FF silver = other incumbents renominated + Resulting composition of the 18th Legislative Assembly of Ontario Source PartyConLibProgL-PUFOLabI-ConTotalSeats retained Incumbents returned 47 4 4 2 1 58Open seats held 11 1 12Acclamation8 8Seats changing hands Incumbents defeated18 2 1 1 1 23Open seats gained3 3 1 7Byelection gain held1 1Ouster of byelection gain by third party 1 1Change in affiliation2 2Total90 11 4 3 1 1 2 112 Seats that changed hands + Elections to the 18th Parliament of Ontario – seats won/lost by party, 1926–1929Party1926Gain from (loss to)1929ConLibProL-ProUFOLabI-LibI-ConI-ProL-PrbON Conservative row-name 73 8 (4) 5 2 (1) 2 1 (1) 3 1 (1) 1 1 90ON Liberal row-name 13 4 (8) 1 1 11ON Progressive row-name 10 (5) (1) 4ON Liberal-Progressive row-name 5 1 (2) (1) 3ON United Farmers row-name 3 (2) 1CA Labour row-name 1 1 (1) 1ON Independent-Liberal row-name 4 (3) (1) –ON Independent-Conservative row-name 1 1 (1) 1 2CA Independent-Progressive row-name 1 (1) –CA Liberal-Prohibitionist row-name 1 (1) –Total 112 7 (24) 8 (6) 6 – 3 (1) 2 – 1 (1) 4 – 1 (2) 1 – 1 – 112 There were 35 seats that changed allegiance in the election: Conservative to Liberal Glengarry Renfrew South Simcoe Centre Waterloo North Conservative to Liberal-Progressive Halton Conservative to Labour Kenora Conservative to Independent-Conservative Rainy River Liberal to Conservative Elgin East Essex South Frontenac—Lennox Haldimand Northumberland Perth South Peterborough County York North Progressive to Conservative Kent East Lincoln Middlesex West Ontario North Prince Edward Progressive to Liberal Bruce South Liberal-Progressive to Conservative Simcoe Southwest Victoria South Liberal-Progressive to Liberal Oxford South UFO to Conservative Lambton East Manitoulin Labour to Conservative Waterloo South Independent-Liberal to Conservative Ottawa East Russell Sturgeon Falls Independent-Liberal to Independent-Conservative Prescott Independent-Conservative to Conservative St. Catharines Independent-Progressive to Conservative Middlesex North Liberal-Prohibitionist to Conservative Dundas See also Politics of Ontario List of Ontario political parties Premier of Ontario Leader of the Opposition (Ontario) Notes References Further reading The Canadian Annual Review of Public Affairs, 1929–30 1930 The Annual Review Company Toronto https://archive.org/details/canadianannualre0000unse_s4b4 Canadian Annual Review 1930 1930 Ontario Sessional Papers, 1930: Vol. LXII - Part II Sessional Paper No. 3 - Return from the Records of the General Election to the Legislative Assembly in 1929 https://archive.org/details/n02ontariosession62ontauoft/page/n7 Toronto King's Printer Category:1929 elections in Canada 1929 Category:1929 in Ontario Category:October 1929 in Canada