1984 reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

none August 2023 August 2023 The list below consists of the reasons delivered from the bench by the Supreme Court of Canada during 1984. This list, however, does not include decisions on motions. Reasons Case nameArguedDecided Laskindied in office on 26 March 1984 Dicksonappointed Chief Justice on 18 April 1984 Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dainappointed on 29 May 1984 Beaudoin-Daigneault v Richard 1984 scc 15 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 2 Desgagné v Fabrique de la paroisse St-Philippe d'Arvida 1984 scc 129 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 1917 March 19822 February 1984 R v Isaac 1984 scc 130 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 74 19 October 19832 February 1984 Telecommunications Workers' Union v. British Columbia Ferry Corporation 1984 scc 131 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 8313 February 198413 February 1984V McKibbon v R 1984 scc 67 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 13118 May 19838 March 1984 Reference re Newfoundland Continental Shelf 1984 scc 132 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 861983 2 22 1983 2 24 yes8 March 1984 Droste v R 1984 scc 68 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 208 2 November 19832 April 1984 The Queen v. Ancio 1984 scc 69 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 225 8 November 19832 April 1984 Bibeault v McCaffrey 1984 scc 133 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 176 1 November 19832 April 1984 Brown v Baugh et al 1984 scc 134 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 1922 February 19842 April 1984 National Bank of Canada v. Retail Clerks' International Union et al 1984 scc 2 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 269 30 November 19843 May 1984filed additional reasons (joined by Estey, McIntyre, Lamer and Wilson JJ) Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker Law Society of Upper Canada v Skapinker 1984 scc 3 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 3571984 2 23 1984 2 24 yes3 May 1984 Reference re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act Reference Re Upper Churchill Water Rights Reversion Act (Nfld) 1984 scc 17 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 2971982 9 28 1982 10 1 yes3 May 1984 R v Garlow 1984 scc 71 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 3863 May 19843 May 1984VCase nameArguedDecided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain Chiasson v The Queen 1984 scc 136 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 266 13 March 19843 May 1984 Hartel Holdings Co Ltd v City of Calgary canlii [1984] 1 SCR 3371983 9 28 1983 9 29 yes3 May 1984 Farr v Farr 1984 scc 2754 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 252 1983 11 29 1983 11 30 yes3 May 1984 Kane v R canlii [1984] 1 SCR 38714 May 198414 May 1984V Reference re: Ownership of the Bed of the Strait of Georgia and Related Areas 1984 scc 138 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 3881982 10 26 1982 10 28 yes17 May 1984 Canadian Merchant Service Guild v Gagnon et al 1984 scc 18 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 509 13 March 19847 June 1984 Stubart Investments Ltd v The Queen 1984 scc 20 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 536 1983 11 23 1983 11 24 yes7 June 1984 Langlois v Ministère de la Justice du Québec 1984 scc 139 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 47214 March 19847 June 1984 R v Wis Development Corporation Ltd et al 1984 scc 140 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 485 13 December 19837 June 1984 Smith v The Queen 1984 scc 141 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 5827 June 19847 June 1984V James Richardson & Sons v M.N.R. 1984 scc 1 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 614 11 October 198321 June 1984 Consumers Distributing Co v Seiko 1984 scc 73 canlii [1984] 1 SCR 583 23 November 198321 June 1984 Kamloops v Nielsen Kamloops (City of) v Nielsen 1984 scc 21 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 222 November 198226 July 1984 Skogman v The Queen 1984 scc 22 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 9322 November 198226 July 1984 AG (Que) v. Quebec Protestant School Boards 1984 scc 32 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 661984 2 21 1984 2 22 yes26 July 1984Case nameArguedDecided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain Khan v R 1984 scc 74 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 6219 June 198426 July 1984 Gould v Attorney General of Canada 1984 scc 142 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 1244 September 19844 September 1984V Hunter et al v Southam Inc Hunter v Southam Inc 1984 scc 33 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 14522 November 198317 September 1984 Royal Bank of Canada v First Pioneer Investments 1984 scc 75 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 1251983 11 9 1983 11 10 yes17 September 1984 Maroukis v Maroukis 1984 scc 76 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 1375 May 198417 September 1984 Ogg-Moss v R 1984 scc 77 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 1733 November 198317 September 1984 Nixon v R 1984 scc 78 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 1973 November 198317 September 1984 Phoenix Assurance v Bird Construction 1984 scc 79 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 19915 June 198317 September 1984 Perka v The Queen R v Perka 1984 scc 23 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 2321984 1 31 1984 2 1 yes11 October 1984 Ken Gordon Excavating v Edstan Construction 1984 scc 80 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 2801984 5 16 1984 5 17 yes11 October 1984 Miller v Miller 1984 scc 81 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 3103 October 198411 October 1984 Wildman v R 1984 scc 82 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 3112 May 198411 October 1984 R v Brese canlii [1984] 2 SCR 33331 October 198431 October 1984V Guerin v The Queen R v Guerin 1984 scc 25 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 3351983 6 13 1983 6 14 yes1 November 1984 Reilly v. R 1984 scc 83 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 3962 November 19831 November 1984Case nameArguedDecided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain Osborne v The Queen 1984 scc 119 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 4061 November 19841 November 1984V Syndicat des employés de production du Québec v CLRB 1984 scc 26 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 4121983 2 1 1983 2 2 yes22 November 1984 Blanchard v Control Data Canada Ltd 1984 scc 27 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 47615 March 198422 November 1984 Cardinal v The Queen 1984 scc 112 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 52322 November 198422 November 1984V Radulesco v Canadian Human Rights Commission 1984 scc 120 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 40723 October 198422 November 1984 British Columbia Development Corporation v Friedmann (Ombudsman) 1984 scc 121 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 44730 January 198422 November 1984 Attorney General of Quebec v Udeco Inc et al 1984 scc 122 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 5021984 5 23 1984 5 24 yes22 November 1984 R v Sophonow 1984 scc 124 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 52410 December 198410 December 1984V Goldwax v Montréal (City of) 1984 scc 125 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 52512 December 198412 December 1984V Nadeau v The Queen 1984 scc 28 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 57021 November 198413 December 1984 Abbas v R 1984 scc 84 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 5265 June 198413 December 1984 Attorney General (Ontario) v Fatehi 1984 scc 85 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 53622 June 198413 December 1984 Duhamel v The Queen 1984 scc 126 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 5552 February 198413 December 1984 Minister of Employment and Immigration et al v Jiminez-Perez et al 1984 scc 127 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 5651984 11 21 1984 11 22 yes13 December 1984 AG (Que) v Greater Hull School Board 1984 scc 29 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 5751984 6 20 1984 6 21 yes20 December 1984Case nameArguedDecided Laskin Dickson Ritchie Beetz Estey McIntyre Chouinard Lamer Wilson Le Dain Lyons v The Queen 1984 scc 30 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 63323 June 198420 December 1984 Wiretap Reference 1984 scc 31 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 6971984 3 26 1984 3 27 yes20 December 1984 Caldwell et al v Stuart et al 1984 scc 128 canlii [1984] 2 SCR 6031984 2 15 1984 2 16 yes20 December 1984 Notes Reasons Of The Supreme Court Of Canada, 1984 Category:Supreme Court of Canada reasons by year *