2006 Idaho Proposition 2

none 2006 Idaho Amendment 2 September 2023 Proposition 2 Shall the above-entitled measure [see text] proposed by Proposition Two be approved?Sample Proposition Ballot http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/inits/06propballot.pdf Idaho Secretary of State 26 November 2021 26 September 2006 https://web.archive.org/web/20060926004948/http://www.sos.idaho.gov/elect/inits/06propballot.pdf 2006-09-26 105778 336083 Idaho Proposition 2 was a 2006 ballot initiative in the state of Idaho, U.S. that aimed to force government to reimburse property owners whose property value is decreased as a result of government regulation. The initiative, which is similar to the controversial Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004), was defeated.2006 General Results statewide https://web.archive.org/web/20061213205346/http://www.idsos.state.id.us/elect/RESULTS/2006/general/tot_stwd.htm 2006-12-13 Text The long title of the proposition states: AN INITIATIVE RELATING TO EMINENT DOMAIN; AMENDING SECTION 7 701, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE PARTIES, AND FOR URBAN RENEWAL OR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES; AND PROVIDE FOR FURTHER JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN; ADDING A NEW SECTION 7-701A TO PROVIDE FOR DEFINITIONS RELATING TO HIGHEST AND BEST USE, FAIR MARKET VALUE, JUST COMPENSATION, AND LAND USE LAW; AND AMENDING CHAPTER 80, TITLE 67, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR JUST COMPENSATION WHEN A REGULATORY ACTION REDUCES FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTY AND TO PROVIDE JUST COMPENSATION TO A CONDEMNEE. Result by county County Yes Yes % No No % Ada 29,002 24.68% 88,493 75.32% Adams 387 23.08% 1,290 76.92% Bannock 4,298 17.70% 19,991 82.30% Bear Lake 752 33.59% 1,487 66.41% Benewah 633 22.17% 2,222 77.83% Bingham 2,278 17.87% 10,473 82.13% Blaine 1,394 19.19% 5,870 80.81% Boise 851 29.88% 1,997 70.12% Bonner 3,505 25.47% 10,258 74.53% Bonneville 5,505 18.24% 24,674 81.76% Boundary 877 27.82% 2,275 72.18% Butte 258 23.16% 856 76.84% Camas 70 15.59% 379 84.41% Canyon 11,672 27.80% 30,320 72.70% Caribou 371 14.75% 2,145 85.25% Cassia 1,274 22.40% 4,413 77.60% Clark 68 20.30% 267 79.70% Clearwater 827 28.40% 2,085 71.60% Custer 585 30.92% 1,307 69.08% Elmore 1,583 27.64% 4,026 72.36% Franklin 1,402 36.76% 2,412 63.24% Fremont 788 18.08% 3,570 81.92% Gem 1,597 28.45% 4,016 71.55% Gooding 778 18.93% 3,332 81.07% Idaho 2,056 32.60% 4,250 67.40% Jefferson 1,420 19.34% 5,921 80.66% Jerome 921 19.64% 3,869 80.36% Kootenai 9,873 26.74% 27,051 73.26% Latah 2,793 23.69% 8,999 76.31% Lemhi 807 26.01% 2,296 73.99% Lewis 413 30.28% 951 69.72% Lincoln 298 20.82% 1,133 79.18% Madison 1,331 16.68% 6,650 83.32% Minidoka 1,038 20.39% 4,053 79.61% Nez Perce 3,438 29.08% 8,384 70.92% Oneida 448 29.97% 1,047 70.03% Owyhee 994 36.52% 1,728 63.48% Payette 1,883 32.79% 3,860 67.21% Power 327 15.63% 1,765 84.37% Shoshone 1,034 27.90% 2,672 72.10% Teton 643 21.02% 2,416 78.98% Twin Falls 3,532 18.47% 15,594 81.53% Valley 846 21.92% 3,014 78.08% Washington 973 29.09% 2,372 70.91% Source: Idaho Secretary of State 180px|thumb|Proposition 2 results by county No: #5D5D2D 80–90% #8B8B54 70–80% #BCBC83 60–70% External links Full text of the amendment References Category:2006 Idaho elections Category:2006 ballot measures in the United States Category:Idaho ballot measures Category:Long stubs with short prose