411 REFERENCE · Wikipedia
12th (Eastern) Infantry Division
Reference material by Wikipedia contributors. This retains its source identity and is not 411 news reporting.
Infantry division of the British Army in the Second World War
the similarly numbered, but unrelated, First World War formation 12th (Eastern) Division
July 2020
September 2017
12th (Eastern) Infantry Division File:12th British Infantry Division WW2.svg The shoulder insignia of the division 7 October 1939 – 11 July 1940 United Kingdom 23px Territorial Army Infantry Roderic Petre Division Second World War* Battle of France
The 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division was an infantry division of the British Army, which fought briefly in the Battle of France during the Second World War. In March 1939, after the re-emergence of Germany as a European power and its occupation of Czechoslovakia, the British Army increased the number of divisions within the Territorial Army by duplicating existing units. The 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division was formed in October 1939, as a second-line duplicate of the 44th (Home Counties) Infantry Division.
It was intended that the division would remain in the United Kingdom to complete training and preparation, before being deployed to France within twelve months of the war breaking out. The division was dispersed to defend Kent and guard strategically important and vulnerable locations. In France, the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) was suffering from a manpower shortage among rear-line units. To boost morale, provide additional labour for the rear echelon of the BEF, and acquire political capital with the French Government and military, the division was sent to France in April 1940, leaving behind most of its administration and logistical units as well as its heavy weapons and artillery. The men were assigned to aid in the construction of airfields and pillboxes. General Sir Edmund Ironside, the Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS), secured a promise from the commander of the BEF, General Lord Gort, that the division would not be used in action owing to it being untrained and incomplete.
When Germany invaded the Netherlands and advanced into northern Belgium, the BEF and French armies moved to meet the attack, leaving the 12th Division behind. The main German attack came through the Ardennes, in southern Belgium beyond the main Allied armies, and then rapidly advanced into France. This move intended to cut off the British and French forces in northern France and Belgium, from other formations along the Franco-German border as well as the Allied supply centres. With no other reserves available, the 12th Division was ordered to the front line to defend several towns blocking the way between the main German assault and the English Channel. This resulted in the division being widely spread out. A brief skirmish occurred on 18 May, in which one of the division's battalions repulsed the German vanguard. However, on 20 May, three German panzer divisions attacked the division in several isolated actions. Without the means to stop the attacking Germans, the division was overwhelmed and destroyed. The survivors were evacuated to England, and the division was broken-up. Its assets were transferred to other formations to help bring them up to strength.
Background
During the 1930s, tensions increased between Germany and the United Kingdom and its allies.Bell 1997 3–4 In late 1937, German policy towards Czechoslovakia became hostile. During 1938, Germany demanded the annexation of the Sudetenland, the border areas of Czechoslovakia that were primarily inhabited by German-ethnic people. These demands led to an international crisis. To avoid war, the British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain met with German chancellor Adolf Hitler in September and brokered the Munich Agreement. The agreement averted a war and allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland.Bell 1997 258–275 Although Chamberlain had intended for the agreement to further a peaceful resolution of issues, relations between the two countries soon deteriorated.Bell 1997 277–278 On 15 March 1939, Germany breached the terms of the agreement by invading and occupying the remnants of the Czech state.Bell 1997 281
On 29 March, British secretary of state for war Leslie Hore-Belisha announced plans to increase the Territorial Army (TA) from 130,000 to 340,000 men and double the number of TA divisions.Gibbs 1976 518The Territorial Army (TA) was a reserve of the British regular army made up of part-time volunteers. By 1939, its intended role was the sole method of expanding the size of the British Army. (This is comparable to the creation of Kitchener's Army during the First World War.) Existing territorial formations would create a second division using a cadre of trained personnel and, if needed, a third division would be created. All TA recruits were required to take the general service obligation: if the British Government decided, territorial soldiers could be deployed overseas for combat. (This avoided the complications of the First World War-era Territorial Force, whose members were not required to leave Britain unless they volunteered for overseas service.)Allport 2015 323French 2001 53Perry 1988 41–42Simkins 2007 43–46 The plan was for existing TA divisions, referred to as the first-line, to recruit over their establishments (aided by improved pay and conditions) and then form a new division, known as the second-line, from cadres around which the new divisions could be expanded.Gibbs 1976 518Messenger 1994 47 This process was dubbed "duplicating". The 44th (Home Counties) Infantry Division provided cadres to create a second line "duplicate" formation, which became the 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division.Messenger 1994 49 Despite the intention for the army to grow, a lack of central guidance on the expansion and duplication process and a dearth of facilities, equipment and instructors complicated the programme.Gibbs 1976 518Perry 1988 48 In April 1939, limited conscription was introduced. At that time 34,500 men, all aged 20, were conscripted into the regular army, initially to be trained for six months before being deployed to the forming second line units.Messenger 1994 49French 2001 64 The War Office had envisioned that the duplicating process and recruiting of the required number of men would take no more than six months.Perry 1988 48Levy 2006 66 The process varied widely between the TA divisions. Some were ready in weeks while others had made little progress by the time the Second World War began on 1 September.Perry 1988 48Levy 2006 66
History
Formation
On 7 October, the 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division became active. The division took control of the 35th, the 36th, and the 37th Brigades, as well as divisional support units, which the 44th (Home Counties) Infantry Division had administered previously.Joslen 2003 56 Because of the lack of official guidance, the newly constituted formations were at liberty to choose numbers, styles, and titles. The division adopted the number of their First World War counterpart: the 12th (Eastern) Division.Perry 1988 48 The division did not use their predecessor's divisional insignia, adopting a plain white diamond instead, which was painted on the division's vehicles but not worn on uniforms.Chappell 1987 21
The 35th Brigade consisted of the 2/5th, the 2/6th, and the 2/7th Battalions, Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey). The 36th Brigade comprised the 2/6th Battalion, East Surrey Regiment (2/6th Surrey), and the 6th and the 7th Battalions, Queen's Own Royal West Kent Regiment (6th RWK and 7th RWK). The 37th Brigade had the 5th Battalion, Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (5th Buffs), and the 6th and the 7th Battalions, Royal Sussex Regiment (6th and 7th Sussex). On 25 October, the 2/6th East Surrey Regiment and the 5th Buffs were exchanged between the 36th and the 37th Brigades.Joslen 2003 56, 282, 284, 286British battalion numbering nomenclature used fractions to signify when a battalion had created a second line unit. The number prior to the fraction detailed the 'line', and the number after was the parent battalion. For example, if the 1st Battalion formed a second line unit, it would be called the 2/1st etc.Story 1961 9 The division was assigned to Eastern Command, and Major-General Roderic Petre became the General Officer Commanding.Joslen 2003 56 Petre's prior experience included commanding the Sudan Defence Force during the inter-war period before being made commandant of the Senior Officers' School in 1938.34171 3928 18 June 1935, 34419 4668 20 July 1937, 34511 3196 17 May 1938
Initial service and transfer to France
thumb|right|alt=See caption|An example of British soldiers on labour duties: in this instance, creating an anti-tank barrier on the Amiens-Rouen road.
The war deployment plan for the TA envisioned its divisions being sent overseas, as equipment became available, to reinforce the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) that had already been dispatched to Europe. The TA would join regular army divisions in waves as its divisions completed their training, the final divisions deploying one year after the war had begun.Gibbs 1976 455, 507, 514–515 In October 1939, Commander-in-Chief, Home Forces, General Walter Kirke, was tasked with drawing up a plan, code named "Julius Caesar", to defend the United Kingdom from a potential German invasion."Julius" was the code word to bring troops to a state of readiness within eight hours. The code word "Caesar" meant an invasion was imminent, and units were to be readied for immediate action. Kirke's plan assumed the Germans would use 4,000 paratroopers, followed by 15,000 troops landed via civilian aircraft once airfields had been secured (Germany only actually had 6,000 such troops), and at least one division of 15,000 troops to be used in an amphibious assault.Newbold 1988 40 As part of this plan, the division was assigned to defend northern Kent.Newbold 1988 47 In addition, its forces were dispersed to guard strategically important locations known to be vulnerable points.Chaplin 1954 116Martineau 1955 219
In early 1940, the division became caught up in an effort to address manpower shortages among the BEF's rear-echelon units.By the end of April, 78,864 men were employed on lines-of-communication duties; 23,545 were allocated to headquarters, hospitals, and other rear-echelon duties; 9,051 were allocated as drafts; 2,515 had not been assigned a role; and 6,859 were supporting the Advanced Air Striking Force. Around 10,000 men who were assigned to railway and other construction tasks to support the lines of communication were included in these figures.Ellis 1954 19 and 21 More men were needed to work along the line of communication, and the army had estimated that by mid-1940 it would need at least 60,000 pioneers for engineering and construction tasks.Perry 1988 52 The lack of such men had taxed the Royal Engineers (RE) and the Auxiliary Military Pioneer Corps (AMPC), and had also impacted frontline units that had to divert men from training to help construct defensive positions along the Franco-Belgian border.Rhodes-Wood 1960 29, 228Jones 2016 228 To address this issue, it was decided to deploy untrained territorial units as an unskilled workforce, thereby alleviating the strain on the existing pioneer units and freeing up regular units to complete their training.Ellis 1954 19, 21Lynch 2010 52 As a result, the decision was made to deploy the 12th (Eastern), 23rd (Northumbrian), and the 46th Infantry Divisions to France. Each division would leave their heavy equipment and most of their logistical, administrative, and support units behind. In total, the elements of the three divisions that were transported to France amounted to 18,347 men.Ellis 1954 19 Lynch 2010 52 Joslen 2003 56, 62, and 75For comparison, the 1939 war-establishment (the on-paper strength) of a three-brigade infantry division was 13,863 men.Joslen 2003 131 and 133 The divisions were to aid in the construction of airfields and pillboxes. The intent was that by August their job would be completed and they could return to the United Kingdom to resume training before being redeployed to France as front-line soldiers.Collier 1961 83 The Army believed that this diversion from guard duty would also raise morale.Jones 2016 228 Lionel Ellis, the author of the British official history of the BEF in France, wrote that while the divisions "were neither fully trained nor equipped for fighting ... a balanced programme of training was carried out so far as time permitted".Ellis 1954 21 Historian Tim Lynch commented the deployment also had a political dimension, allowing "British politicians to tell their French counterparts that Britain had supplied three more infantry divisions towards the promised nineteen by the end of the year".Lynch 2010 52
General Edmund Ironside, Chief of the Imperial General Staff, opposed this use of these divisions. He reluctantly caved to the political pressure to release the divisions, having been assured by General Sir John Gort (commander of the BEF) that the troops would not be used as frontline combat formations.Lynch 2010 52 Smalley 2015 75 Murland 2016 Chapter Four: "Massacre of the Innocents 19–20 May 1940" The 12th left the United Kingdom on 20 April 1940, arrived in France two days later, and was placed under the direct command of the BEF.Joslen 2003 56
German invasion of France
Battle of France
thumb|300px|left|alt=See caption|The operating area of the various Allied formations are shown in blue. The German formations are shown in red. The red area denotes the territory captured by Germany between 10 and 16 May 1940.
On 10 May 1940, the Phoney War—the period of inactivity on the Western Front since the start of the conflict—ended as the German military invaded Belgium and the Netherlands.Weinberg 1994 122 As a result, the majority of the BEF along with the best French armies and their strategic reserve moved forward to assist the Belgian and Dutch armies.Weinberg 1994 123–125 While these forces attempted to stem the tide of the German advance, the main German assault pushed through the Ardennes Forest and crossed the River Meuse. This initiated the Battle of Sedan and threatened to split the Allied armies in two, separating those in Belgium from the rest of the French military along the Franco-German border.Weinberg 1994 126–127
Once the Allied commanders realised that the German crossing of the Meuse had turned into a breakthrough, the BEF and French armies began a fighting withdrawal from Belgium back to France. On 17 May, the 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division was ordered to assemble around Amiens. The next day, Lieutenant-Colonel Robert Bridgeman, in charge of the BEF's rear headquarters, requested that Petre take command of an ad hoc force that included his 36th Brigade, a makeshift garrison in Arras and the 23rd (Northumbrian) Division. This collection of troops was dubbed Petreforce. Petreforce, along with the 12th Division, were the only troops blocking the German route to the sea and the defeat of the BEF.Ellis 1954 59, 65, 77Sebag-Montefiore 2006 129–131 On being appointed to this command, Petre was provided with an over-optimistic report that he then passed on to his subordinates: the French were resilient on either side of the German breakthrough, and that only small German units had penetrated deep into French territory. With this information, it was expected that Petreforce could handle the German incursion.Sebag-Montefiore 2006 131 However, the 12th Division was woefully under-equipped for the task assigned to it. On average, there were only four Boys anti-tank rifles and one ML 3-inch mortar per each of the divisions nine battalions. In comparison, a fully equipped division was to have 361 anti-tank rifles and 18 three-inch mortars spread over these units. Some units were issued with training rounds for the anti-tank rifles, which were not effective against tanks. Within the 35th Brigade, there was only five such rifles and a total of 35 rounds. At the platoon level, there was an average of one Bren light machine gun instead of three.Joslen 2003 131 French 2001 38–39 Thompson 2009 69 Lynch 2010 98
Demise of the division
thumb|right|alt=See caption|A column from the 6th Panzer Division, 1940. A Panzer 35(t) leads the column, followed by close support Panzer IV medium tanks, with Panzer II light tanks at the rear.
The 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division was widely dispersed across four areas, unable to support each other, and this further eroded the division's limited fighting power. The 35th Brigade took up positions along the eastern side of Abbeville. The 36th Brigade dispatched the 6th RWK and the 5th Buffs to Doullens. The 7th RWK, supplemented by four field guns obtained from a Royal Artillery training school, occupied Cléry-sur-Somme to block the exits from Péronne, which had a bridge across the Canal du Nord. French troops were supposed to hold it, but they never arrived. The 37th Brigade was caught-up in a German bombing raid on Amiens, which resulted in between 60 and 100 casualties.Ellis 1954 77–79Sebag-Montefiore 2006 138Thompson 2009 73 It then dispatched the 6th Sussex and the 7th Sussex to take up positions south of the town. The 2/6th Surrey's were ordered to move south to join the 51st (Highland) Infantry Division, but ended up being allocated to an ad hoc composition called Beauforce.Ellis 1954 77–79
The German 1st Panzer Division reached Péronne during the evening of 18 May. They crossed the canal and attempted to carry on their advance, but the 7th RWK and their four field guns stopped them. Fighting continued until dark, when the Germans fell back into Péronne and the 7th RWK fell back to Albert.Ellis 1954 78 The next day saw no German activity along the division's front. On 20 May, the 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division was engaged in a series of isolated battles. The 1st Panzer Division advanced on Albert and overran the 7th RWK. It then moved towards Amiens and destroyed the 37th Brigade's 7th Sussex in the process. The 6th Panzer Division reached Doullens and was held up by the 36th Brigade for two and a half hours, before they overwhelmed the brigade. The 2nd Panzer Division arrived at Abbeville and occupied the town after defeating the 35th Brigade.Ellis 1954 80 Ellis wrote that the 12th Division "had practically ceased to exist", as a result of the fighting that saw the "whole tract of country between the Scarpe and the Somme" fall into German hands, and left the way to the English Channel open.Ellis 1954 81
The German XXXXI Panzer Corps war diary reported that the 6th Panzer Division was "only able to gain ground slowly and with continual fighting against an enemy who defended himself stubbornly".Ellis 1954 81 Historians have praised the division for delaying the German advance for several hours, despite being under-equipped, un-prepared and fighting against unfavourable odds.Ellis 1954 81 Fraser 1999 61 Horne 2007 561 Lynch 2010 52 The historian Gregory Blaxland was more critical, and wrote "it was both tragic and wasteful to have committed these men of little training but great spirit to battle at such hopeless disadvantage."Blaxland 1973 130 Both Blaxland and the historian Julian Thompson cited the praise delivered upon these battalions by the Germans, in their war diaries. However, they argued that the British Army had not heeded the lessons of the invasion of Poland nor given enough thought into how infantry should counter tanks. They believe had the battalions been concentrated and placed in more defensible positions, such as behind the Canal du Nord, they would have held greater tactical value and delayed the Germans longer than they achieved. The BEF had intended to deploy the 12th Division behind this canal, but this intention was not acted upon prior to the division being dispersed.Blaxland 1973 117, 130Thompson 2009 77 Blaxland highlighted that the overall lack of training within the territorial soldiers should not have been an issue, as all levels of command were held by regular soldiers who should have been able to impress their greater experience upon the recruits.Blaxland 1973 130 Thompson noted, however, "it has to be borne in mind that a delay of even one hour was of huge benefit" to the BEF.Thompson 2009 77
Most of Petreforce suffered a similar fate. The 23rd (Northumbrian) Division was overrun by the 8th Panzer Division on 20 May.Thompson 2009 81–82Rissik 2004 37–42 Meanwhile, the 5th Infantry Division and the 50th (Northumbrian) Motor Division had taken up positions in Arras, and the 5th Division took command of the garrison. On 25 May, Petreforce was officially abolished.Ellis 1954 131, 139 The remnants of the 12th Division were evacuated back to England. The 36th Brigade evacuated via Dunkirk, and the rest of the division was largely evacuated via Cherbourg during Operation Aerial.Martineau 1955 233 Haswell 1967 129 Langley 1972 104 Sebag-Montefiore 2006 137–138 Divisional casualty information is sparse. The 35th Brigade started the campaign with 2,400 men, and was reduced to 1,234 after their encounter with the 2nd Panzer Division.Lynch 2010 121
Within the 36th Infantry Brigade, the 6th RWK was reduced from 578 men to 75, and the 605 strong 5th Buffs was reduced to 80.Sebag-Montefiore 2006 137–138
Disbandment
As soon as the Allied troops returned from France, the British Army began implementing lessons learnt from the campaign. This involved the decision to abandon the two-brigade motor division concept and for the basic infantry division to be based around three brigades.French 2001 189–191Perry 1988 54British military doctrine development during the inter-war period established three types of divisions: the infantry division, the mobile division (later called an armoured division), and the motor division (a motorised infantry division). The primary role of the infantry division was to penetrate the enemy's defensive line with the support of infantry tanks. Any gap created would then be exploited by mobile divisions, and the territory thus captured would be secured by the fast-moving motor divisions. These tactics would transform the attack into a break-through, while maintaining mobility.French 2001 37–41 By 1940, five such divisions had been formed within the TA: the 1st London, the 2nd London, the 50th (Northumbrian), the 55th (West Lancashire), and the 59th (Staffordshire) Motor Divisions.French 2001 41Joslen 2003 37, 41, 61, 90, 93 French wrote that the motor division "matched that of the German army's motorized and light divisions. But there the similarities ended." German motorised divisions contained three regiments (comparable to British brigades) and were as fully equipped as a regular infantry division, while the smaller light divisions contained a tank battalion. The motor division, fully motorised and capable of transporting all their infantry, contained no tanks and was "otherwise much weaker than normal infantry divisions" or their German counterparts.French 2001 41 This entailed the break up of four second-line TA divisions to reinforce depleted formations and aid in transforming the Army's five motor divisions into infantry divisions.French 2001 189–191Perry 1988 54The two-brigade strong 23rd (Northumbrian) Division was disbanded on 23 June. One brigade was transferred to the 50th (Northumberland) Motor Division as part of their transition into an infantry formation, while the other was eventually transferred to the 49th (West Riding) Infantry Division to bring it up to full strength.Joslen 2003 79–82, 301 The 66th Infantry Division was disbanded on 3 June, with one brigade transferred to the 59th (Staffordshire) Motor Division to finalise its re-organisation, and the other was initially attached to another transiting motor formation, the 1st London Division.Joslen 2003 93–94, 97, 362 On 7 August, the 51st (Highland) Infantry Division, destroyed in France, was re-created by the re-designation of its second-line duplicate, the 9th (Highland) Infantry Division.Joslen 2003 55 Consequently, the 12th (Eastern) Infantry Division was disbanded on 11 July, and its units dispersed.Joslen 2003 56
The 35th Infantry Brigade (along with the 113th Field Regiment and the 67th Anti-Tank Regiment) were transferred to the 1st London Division, a motor formation. The arrival of the brigade was part of the division's re-organisation into an infantry division. With little change to the composition of the brigade, it would fight in the Italian Campaign between 1943 and 1945.Joslen 2003 37, 56, 282 The 36th Infantry Brigade was briefly attached to the 2nd London Division (another motor formation), before becoming an independent infantry brigade directly under the command of either the War Office or as a corps-level asset. It was eventually transferred to the 78th Infantry Division, and the brigade (with some changes) fought in the North African Campaign in 1942, the invasion of Sicily in 1943, and in the Italian Campaign from 1943 through to the end of the war.Joslen 2003 41–42, 101, 284 The 37th Infantry Brigade became an independent formation under corps level command. It was re-designated the 7th Infantry Brigade in 1941, before being assigned to a variety of divisions based in the United Kingdom throughout the rest of the war.Joslen 2003 286 The 114th Field Regiment also joined the 2nd London Division and stayed with the division until the end of 1941.Joslen 2003 41 It was then transferred to India and attached to the 20th Indian Infantry Division and fought in the Burma Campaign.Joslen 2003 505 The 118th Field Regiment was transferred to the 18th Infantry Division, to bring it up to strength in artillery. They would fight and surrender following the Battle of Singapore in 1942.Joslen 2003 60–61 The division's engineers became the XII Corps Troops, Royal Engineers, and served as part of the Second Army in the North-West Europe campaign in 1944–1945.Morling 1972 211, 225–234 The survivors of the divisional signals unit were allocated to signal units based within the United Kingdom, Sudan, and units in the Mediterranean and Middle East theatre.Lord Watson 2003 153
Order of battle
12th (Eastern) Infantry Division (1939–40):Joslen 2003 56
35th Infantry BrigadeJoslen 2003 282
2/5th Battalion, Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey)
2/6th Battalion, Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey)
2/7th Battalion, Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey)
36th Infantry BrigadeJoslen 2003 284
2/6th Battalion, East Surrey Regiment (left 25 October 1939)
6th Battalion, Queen's Own Royal West Kent Regiment
7th Battalion, Queen's Own Royal West Kent Regiment
5th Battalion, Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (from 25 October 1939)
37th Infantry BrigadeJoslen 2003 286
5th Battalion, Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (left 25 October 1939)
6th Battalion, Royal Sussex Regiment
7th (Cinque Ports) Battalion, Royal Sussex Regiment
2/6th Battalion, East Surrey Regiment (from 25 October 1939)
Divisional TroopsJoslen 2003 56
12th (Eastern) Divisional artillery, Royal Artillery
113th (Home Counties) Field Regiment
114th (Sussex) Field Regiment
118th Field Regiment, Royal Artillery
67th Anti-Tank Regiment, Royal Artillery
12th (Eastern) Divisional Engineers, Royal Engineers
262nd Field Company
263rd Field Company
264th Field Company
265th (Sussex) Field Park Company
12th (Eastern) Divisional Signals, Royal Corps of Signals
See also
United Kingdom
List of British divisions in World War II
British Army Order of Battle (September 1939)
Footnotes
Citations
References
Alan Allport Alan Allport Browned Off and Bloody-minded: The British Soldier Goes to War 1939–1945 New Haven Yale University Press 2015 978-0-300-17075-7
P. M. H. Bell The Origins of the Second World War in Europe 2nd Pearson London 1997 1986 978-0-582-30470-3
Gregory Blaxland 1973 Destination Dunkirk: The Story of Gort's Army London William Kimber 816504061
Chaplin Howard Douglas 1954 The Queen's Own Royal West Kent Regiment, 1920–1950 Michael Joseph London 558561129
Chappell Michael Michael Chappell 1987 Men-At-Arms British Battle Insignia 1939–1940 2 Osprey London 978-0-85045-739-1
Collier Richard Richard Collier (historian) The Sands of Dunkirk https://archive.org/details/sandsofdunkirk00coll registration E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc. 1961 New York 974413933
Lionel F. Ellis Lionel Ellis Butler J. R. M. James Ramsay Montagu Butler History of the Second World War, United Kingdom Military Series The War in France and Flanders 1939–1940 London Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1954 1087882503 http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/UN/UK/UK-NWE-Flanders/index.html
Fraser David David Fraser (British Army officer) And We Shall Shock Them: The British Army in the Second World War London Cassell Military 1999 1983 978-0-304-35233-3
French David Raising Churchill's Army: The British Army and the War Against Germany 1919–1945 Oxford University Press 2001 2000 Oxford 978-0-199-24630-4
N. H. Gibbs N. H. Gibbs History of the Second World War Grand Strategy I London Her Majesty's Stationery Office 1976 978-0-116-30181-9 registration https://archive.org/details/grandstrategy02butl
Haswell Jock The Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey): (The 2nd Regiment of Foot) H. Hamilton 1967 London 877364233
Alistair Horne 2007 1990 To Lose a Battle: France 1940 London Penguin 978-0-14103-065-4
Jones Alexander David Pinchbeck Regulars? The Role and Organisation of the Territorial Army, 1919–1940 2016 PhD Balliol College, University of Oxford Oxford 974510947
Michael Langley 1972 The East Surrey Regiment (The 31st and 70th Regiments of Foot) London Cooper 1027224968
James P. Levy James P. Levy 2006 Appeasement and Rearmament: Britain, 1936–1939 Lanham Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 978-0-7425-4537-3
Cliff Lord Graham Watson 2003 Royal Corps of Signals: Unit Histories of the Corps (1920–2001) and its Antecedents Solihull Helion 978-1-87462-207-9
Tim Lynch 2010 Dunkirk 1940 'Whereabouts Unknown': How Untrained Troops of the Labour Division were Sacrificed to Save an Army Stroud Spellmount/The History Press 978-0-75245-490-0
G.D. Martineau 1955 A History of the Royal Sussex Regiment; A History of the Old Belfast Regiment and the Regiment of Sussex, 1701-1953 Chichester Moore & Tillyer 38743977
Messenger Charles 1994 A History of British Infantry For Love of Regiment 1915–1994 2 London Pen & Sword Books 978-0-85052-422-2
Morling L.F. 1972 Sussex Sappers: A History of the Sussex Volunteer and Territorial Army Royal Engineer Units from 1890 to 1967 Seaford 208th Field Coy. R.E. Committee and C. Hollington 558527345
Murland Jerry 2016 Retreat & Rearguard: Dunkirk 1940: The Evacuation of the BEF to the Channel Ports Barnsley Pen & Sword Military 978-1-47382-366-2
Newbold David John British Planning And Preparations To Resist Invasion on Land, September 1939 – September 1940 1988 PhD King's College London London 556820697 https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/2928115/DX199711.pd
Frederick William Perry The Commonwealth Armies: Manpower and Organisation in Two World Wars War, Armed Forces and Society Manchester Manchester University Press 1988 978-0-71902-595-2
Rissik David The D.L.I. at War. The History of the Durham Light Infantry 1939–1945 1952 2004 Uckfield Naval and Military Press 978-1-84574-144-0
Rhodes-Wood Edward Harold A War History of the Royal Pioneer Corps, 1939–1945 1960 Aldershot Gale & Polden 3164183
Hugh Sebag-Montefiore Hugh Sebag-Montefiore Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man Cambridge, Massachusetts Harvard University Press 2006 978-0-674-0-2439-7 https://archive.org/details/dunkirkfighttola00seba
Peter Simkins Kitchener's Army: The Raising of the New Armies 1914–1916 Barnsley Pen & Sword Military 2007 1988 978-1-84415-585-9
Edward Smalley The British Expeditionary Force, 1939–40 Basingstoke Palgrave MacMillan 2015 978-1-137-49419-1
H. H. Story 1961 The History of the Cameronians (Scottish Rifles): 1910-1933 Slough Hazell Watson & Viney 758883173
Thompson Julian Julian Thompson (Royal Marines officer) Dunkirk. Retreat to Victory 2009 Pan Books London 978-1-50986-004-3
Gerhard L. Weinberg Gerhard Weinberg A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1994 978-0-52144-317-3
Category:Infantry divisions of the British Army in World War II
Category:Military units and formations established in 1939
Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 1940